Are the Gargoyles not "cool" any more? would a live

>>94815973

It was too low on slapstick to be Marvel-tier success.

I'd buy a ticket though.

>>94816041
>too low on slapstick
The show had quite a bit, and they could easily play it up for the movie

>The trio doing goofy things
>the gargoyles being confused about future stuff
>Goliath and Elisa's awkward bestiality romance
>"jalapeno!"

Judging by that I have to selfbump my thread I got my answer.

>wanting this series turned into homogenized live-action cape shit

>>94815973
i'm fucking tired of reboots and nostalgia farming. so, who cares?

>>94815973

Gargoyles was never really cool but it did respect it's audience and gave us an interesting world to explore.

I'd hate to see a movie adaption for a number of reasons but mainly because Manhattan kinda sucks now.

>>94815973
Give it the Netflix treatment instead. Well-done character redesigns would at the very least capture the fujo audience. It worked for Voltron.

>>94818025
>Well-done character redesigns would at the very least capture the fujo audience.
Please god no!

Keep them as they are, or make them a little less humanoid but don't just turn them into bishonen trash.

File: tumblr_n7pmnvHDmz1s0swcgo1_1280.png (109KB, 664x778px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 664x778px

>>94818214
>don't just turn them into bishonen
I don't know how to tell you this, but they were husbando bait right from the start.

File: 3939926-xanatos-gargoyles[1].jpg (14KB, 397x300px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 397x300px

>>94815973

>Gargoyles
>Live action

By the smugness of Xanatos, please no.

>>94818214
You don't need bishounen anymore. "Daddy" and "Beast" types are in vogue now. I remember a popular complaint about the beauty and the beast live action movie was that the beast should have stayed a beast.

If disney/marvel plan on making a movie, they better do it soon before everyone forgets this franchise even existed.

>>94815973
always hated this show. so gay.

>>94820474
imagine being this retarded

>>94820452
I don't know, they rebooted Duck Tales and its quite a few years older than Gargoyles.

>>94820811
But Scrooge made a handful of appearances between the old and new Ducktales, and people make memes about the old show all the time. Whereas Gargoyles hasn't really had much in the way of recent material other than that comic from ten years ago.

File: Griff16.jpg (87KB, 384x288px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 384x288px

>>94820474
I don't see anything gay about Gargoyles, mister.

>>94820868
Yeah, but I imagine that kids who are like, 10 or so at this point in time probably didn't know much about the character of Scrooge other than "he's a rich duck".

You could probably reset Gargoyles easily, but why would you?

The modern trend seems to be rebooting episodic series and making them more serialized, but Gargoyles was already really serialized (especially for the time). It's not like you can cram more lore into the series without making it overstuffed - hell it already got too lore heavy when they got to the Avalon arc and Goliaths daughter.

File: 448138-01_073.jpg (19KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 640x480px

>>94820474
nothing gay here

File: Disney-Gargoyles-The-Thrill-of-the-Hunt-lex-and-goliath-argue.png (167KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 400x300px

>>94821327
nope all straight

>>94815973
It would flop beacuse it would suffer from Avatar the movie syndrome, and beacuse IT'S FUCKING DEAD STOP MAKING GARGOYLE THREADS