>People have been saying since the mid-’80s that ‘comics have grown up.’ I don’t think that’s factually true. I think what happened was that there have been a couple of comics that seemed to be reaching for a more mature readership, and that has coincided with the emotional age of the mass audience coming the other way.
Is he right, /co/?
>>94806279
>Is he right, /co/?
Is he ever?
>>94806362
always
>>94806279
Remember when Alan Moore was a relevant writer?
Remember when he was a GOOD writer?
>>94806434
yeah providence just finished and it was great
>>94806449
It was competent but nothing amazing.
>>94806467
Better than Johns going through his trash and Rebrith as a whole. Also better than Image movie pitches.
>>94806482
Well yeah, but that's some extremely low-hanging fruit to compare with.
>>94806516
I guess that just proves his point that comics are shit.
>>94806516
What else is there to compare with? We're talking American market.