has anyone else felt that the art quality of the Simpsons has

>>94601307
nah, i dont mind the art.

just the bad writing.

>>94601367
they use a lot more expressions
that dont fit with the art style
and just look awkward

>>94601307
1987-1990- Klasky Csupo microbudget
1990-1992- Klasky Csupo [decent enough budget]
1992-2002- Film Roman (cel animation)
2002-2009- Film Roman (digital animation)
2009-2016- Film Roman (digital HD)
2016-2019- Fox Animation

No wonder the most recent episodes look like complete dung.

>>94601307
it's fucking boring to look at, even when the characters are moving, it's like they're not really moving it's so stiff.

every one-off character or celebrity cameo after the first couple of seasons also looks hideous, there's unnecessary detail and realism in the face in a show that originally looked anything but realistic.

All the incidental characters made for the show have been bland looking for nearly 20 years. And it gets worse every season.

>>94601307
Yeah, it looks freakishly smooth and shiny now.

digital animation has gotten so cheap that any hack can do it now

Family Guy is way worse than the Simpsons, it borders on Flash territory

>>94601307
Someone made a Youtube video comparing the animation. In motion shots they used to exaggerate movement and make it more cartoon-like. Now they it's way too stiff and smooth and looks... off.

>>94601717
Marge is like a fucking robot.

They should get TMS to animate all of their episodes and put in Laura Haruko

>>94601728
Link?

>>94601716
The worst thing about Family Guy is the complete dependence on stock poses, faces and settings/backgrounds.

Its strange that American Dad only really has a problem with the faces and 3/4 perspective.

>>94601716
Depends on what you mean by digital animation. Simply switching from cel to digital doesn't fundamentally change the animation process.

>>94601755
Maybe Moe gets a cellphone.

File: o.jpg (32KB, 453x500px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 453x500px

>>94601996

File: IMG_0387.gif (1MB, 371x209px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 371x209px

>>94601717
Every time I see this.