When Big threatens people with "icing," does that mean he's just going to dip them in ice cold water and scare them for life
>>94553564
I was under the impression that it meant he was going to dip them in ice cold water until they froze to death or drowned.
It can't be lethal though. Otherwise Judy letting him get away with doing this to others, as an officer of the law, is horribly wrong.
>>94553564
>>94553979
>>94554498
>"say hi to grandmama"
Kids. He was going to kill them!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHURiOqMVTI
>>94554498
>Otherwise Judy letting him get away with doing this to others, as an officer of the law, is horribly wrong.
Sure is. Judy is allowing it to continue, because organized crime is, at least, more controlled than the random violence of nighthowler-induced predator attacks. The fact that Judy's in debt to them is more worrisome.
>>94554718
No she's not. She saved Fru fru.No one owes anything anyone anymore.
I thought it was just a silly pun.
>>94554802
She saved Fru-Fru, for which Mr. Big repaid them by NOT icing them and giving them information on Manchas. But then Judy requested an extra favor in the intimidation of Duke Weaselton.
Besides, just when you think you're out, they pull you back in.
>>94554859
You know what would impress me? If the "favor" Judy owes Mr. Big is brought up in the sequel, especially if it's a major plot point.
It's not going to be, of course, but it'd be cool as hell if it was.
>>94554859
Did she explicitly request a favor since it felt more like a collaboration to me? He wanted to know who messed with his favorite florist presumably for revenge purposes and she wanted needed to get a lead from him. Judy is the Godmother to his grandchildren anyway so she's in way too deep to get out by now.
>>94555016
>sequel
Nah, they barely pieced this movie together in time. Besides, conflict was resolved, there was character development for both animals.
There's nowhere to go.