>After Thanos who can possibly be a bigger threat
>We need Galactus and Doom, fork em over, Fox
>>94165830
I dunno. Maybe stop with the universe-is-ending escalation and instead make smaller stories with more concrete stakes?
>>94165967
Well, we just had that with Spider-Man. Ant-Man had relativelysmallstakes, too.
they wont have Cap and Iron Man to continue. It'll fold under
>>94165967
Feige has mentioned wanting to do this. Instead of having three phases that build towards Thanos, instead having one phase that builds towards Dark Reign and Norman Osborne, for instance.
>He thinks MCU will survive past Infinity War.
Shit's dying fampai. Not even Spider-Man can save it. Their only hope is somehow writing in Tobey Spider-Man.
>>94165830
lacking galactus and the phoenix, either your pic, celestials or shuma
Fox needs to swallow their pride and admit they'll never get Fantastic Four to work.
>>94167400
It will, they'll just ease off the gas a fair bit and keep their budgets/expectations low before slowly building up audience hype for the films again. As it is, theatres are saturated with Marvel films (not just MCU) and people are getting fucking tired of the constant onslaught.
>>94165830
I hated the retcon of the Beyonder.
I got you covered, all Marvel needs to do is get him once and everything will be 100% KINO.
>>94167733
This. Especially since Feige said they're going full cosmic.