>It's the future and comic/cartoon artists still can't

>>93992307
Um, that's not a "drawing".

>>93992307
"Nice panel, we need at least seven of those a page, 22 pages by the end of the month. Get on it!"

>>93992321
And it's not really "ancient"

>>93992349
We have the technology today, just noskill

File: IMG_0185.png (856KB, 1173x746px) Image search: [Google]

856KB, 1173x746px

Better than Caravaggio

File: Plisch_und_Plum2[1].jpg (126KB, 768x954px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 768x954px

>>93992307
Lame bait. The pic is from 1888. Pic related is a real comic from that time.

>>93992910
I get it

>>93992518
Well Caravaggio was a sexist white murderer so of course its better.

>>93992910
>sorry kids, no dinner tonight, the fucking dogs got it
I can't stop laughing. Older generations did dark humor better.

>>93993010
???

>>93992307
Ok.

That painting probably took 40+ hours - for just the painting part. It's fairly large (71x91 in) so it could easily have taken longer, and there was probably a number of preliminary sketches and color studies and such.

But let's just say 40 hours, because that's a work week.

Do you want your comics to come out at the rate of one page a week? Y'all fucking bitch about Aaron Diaz's pace but is that what you want?
>>93992468
There are plenty of skilled artists, both in comics and outside. If you head over to Art Renewal Center, you can see a lot of artists painting like this.

You won't generally see it in comics because it takes longer.

>>93994570
Artfag here, that painting took the better half of 20 years.

>>93995367
This, this and another this.