In your opinion, are there certain characters that should never

>>93989963
Any Winnie the Pooh character should never be sexualized.

>>93990140
Everyone besides Christopher is fair game I feel

If I were a creative creator I'm not sure if I'd be surprised or offended if they DIDN'T make porn of my characters

>>93990404
Offended. The amount of porn created for something is a strong indicator of it's popularity and how much people like the characters.

>>93989963
IMO, it's more of a matter of what characters I can stand seeing sexualized and what I don't, cause I bet that there are characters I sexualize often that many would find off-limits, while many of the characters I don't want sexualized are lusted after by many.

But like all else, if you're not being a creepy sperg and/or harming real people over it, I could care less who you lust after.

>>93990404
>>93990498
I guess it would ultimately depend on the nature of what exactly my creation is and what I want it to be, but yeah, I feel like it's almost a rite of passage at this point.

>>93990404

I'd be offended. But then, like to write about attractive women.

Nothing's off limits, homie

File: 1489440896670.jpg (75KB, 565x600px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 565x600px

>>93989963

Very much so, yes. Mostly /v/ and /a/.

Yes.

File: 1468960261654.jpg (425KB, 1854x2053px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 1854x2053px

non-humanoid robots.

>>93991902

Hm. How sad that my first thought was "Dude, how'd they make that Devastator?"

File: fuckthisI'mout.gif (772KB, 302x172px) Image search: [Google]

772KB, 302x172px

oh yeah a thread like this is going places. Places like Cottonweed, Arkansas
bail while you still can

File: a usual day on 4chan.png (518KB, 1024x537px) Image search: [Google]

518KB, 1024x537px

>>93989963

>>93989963
The Bananas in Pajamas.

File: SO DOES THE NSA BITE ME NERD.jpg (197KB, 500x669px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 500x669px

>>93989963
I mean you could draw Wallace and Gromit porn if you wanted to, nothings stopping you, nothing will ever be able to stop you if you wanted it.

but how would you fucking sleep at night knowing what you did?

File: stevenstop.jpg (35KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 400x400px

I'm not a pedophile, so kids under 14 being sexualized leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I avoid it.

File: images.jpg (5KB, 274x184px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 274x184px

>>93992251
Some people manage.

>>93992269
this poor mouse has been corrupted
I wouldn't be surprised if he drew porn of him at this point.

File: salt.jpg (273KB, 1280x956px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 1280x956px

>>93992042
wew lad

>>93992264
Apparently you are if 14 year-olds turn you on.

>>93992303
>"LMFAO LEMME ACT LIKE A RETARD"
>"Dude stop no one likes it when you do that."
>"Hey man no reason to be SALTY about what he's doing"

File: tumblr_nfgg2oSFDn1tmfjouo1_250.jpg (66KB, 250x280px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 250x280px

>>93989963
I suppose this is the character that like, it would be really unfair to sexualize.

Then again, there isn't a lot of porn for Wirt either.

File: 14 MILLION.jpg (31KB, 544x366px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 544x366px

>>93992269
>YOU USED TO HAVE A LIFE
>YOU USED TO HAVE DREAMS
>NOW YOU'RE JUST THE GUY WHO DRAWS WALLACE PORN

>>93992323
There's nothing wrong with being attracted to animated teens 15 and older my man.

>>93992264
>>93992359
So 14-15 is a gray area then.

File: pedonolonger.jpg (184KB, 850x692px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 850x692px

>>93992264

File: Canada.png (33KB, 410x450px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 410x450px

>>93992251
Uncensored >>>/aco/1569029

File: starfire.jpg (137KB, 699x562px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 699x562px

>>93992405
>>93992323
>>93992478
Consider that this is an animated 14-15 year old.

Yes.

The more likely problem is that whatever artist it is who's drawing it can't make it sexy.

>>93992251
I mean, I drew Family Guy porn and I sleep just fine

The lowest you should go is 14.

And the only reason I say that is because of Yoko Littner.

>>93989963
Children
Animals

Fuck all of you.

>>93992710
>Boco is a pedo too

Why am I not surprised?

>>93989963
historical figures like Plato or Einstein.

>>93992737
what about animal children?

>>93992764
>finding starfire, raven or terra attractive makes you a pedo
reminder that we're on /co/ and we're talking about animated teens

>>93992768
that's doubly wrong but it won't stop me from finding Gumball attractive

>>93992809
Oh I'm sorry, EPHEBOphile. My mistake.

>>93992836
who the fuck cares, they're not real

>>93989963
depends on what you do with it

File: k.jpg (115KB, 850x755px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 850x755px

>>93990140
too late

File: azula.png (200KB, 504x336px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 504x336px

>>93992836
stop being a retard, this is a 14 year old and if you don't find her attractive you're a faggot

>>93992768
I'm not a furry but 2011 WilyKit does things to me

>>93992851
>>93992891

You changed the subject.

I'm not saying what you're doing is inherently wrong, just that you ARE an ephebophile (and would be considered a pedophile by most of society) regardless of whether or not the characters are will.

And even if it's animated, kiddie porn is still kiddie porn in the US and can get you arrested depending on the state.

File: i hope i don't get banned for this.png (129KB, 233x429px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 233x429px

>>93992336

File: Marinette.png (700KB, 654x718px) Image search: [Google]

700KB, 654x718px

>>93992906
I didn't change the subject, dumbass. We're in a /co/ thread talking about sexualizing ANIMATED children and I posted that under 14 is off limits for me.

Animated 14 year olds look old as fuck you retard.

>>93992906
I didn't change the subject, I really do not care, the characters depicted are not real so people can draw whatever they please
just like I don't freak out if I see gore, I don't see why it should be different with lewds honestly

File: Tigger.png (714KB, 613x639px) Image search: [Google]

714KB, 613x639px

Does no one remember the Amalgam Comics mashup of Tigger and Jasmine?

>>93992979
this conversation is retarded

age is relative rl and animated mate and an arbitrary number means jack fucking shit

humans mature at different speeds

humans can easily perceive people rl and animated as being young or older depending on how they dress, speak and look

stop being retarded

File: 1487100189747.jpg (70KB, 525x502px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 525x502px

>>93992264
Steven isn't under 14, so thanks for motivating me to draw Steven nsfw.

File: sephiroth1254d1436700013a.jpg (78KB, 932x960px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 932x960px

>>93992336
For me, the entire show is too pure for R34. I have seen some of Wirt, and I desperately wish I hadn't.

>>93992930
fuck you

>>93993049
>age is relative rl and animated mate and an arbitrary number means jack fucking shit
That's my exact point, faggot

If they were animated to look like actual children I wouldn't be attracted to them.

>>93992979
>Animated 14 year olds look old as fuck
>Proceeds to post image of girl who looks super young

Not helping your case.

>>93992980
I really don't give a shit either, but I wish people would stop being in denial about it and admit their pedophiles and ephebophiles.

Like honestly I'm totally fine with porn of 14 year old cartoon characters if that's what it takes to keep you from acting out on your urges or just to satiate your fetish, but at least admit you're attracted to younger traits.

>>93989963
>sexualized
eroticized*

File: Dot.png (136KB, 402x490px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 402x490px

>>93989963
Any character who visibly looks under 10.

>>93993049
It's not a matter of appearance, it's a matter of ability to consent.

If you're attracted to younger looking people and date 20 year olds that look like teens, that's fine because they have the mental capacity to consent.

But if you're attracted to younger looking people and fap to lolis that are technically 200 years old, their age doesn't matter in this context because you're only attracted to the physical aspects of the object.

>>93992906
>And even if it's animated, kiddie porn is still kiddie porn in the US and can get you arrested depending on the state.

That happened, what, once?

File: only look young.webm (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

>>93993096
But what if the character themselves want the D and felt that them looking forever young is a curse?

the veggietales

>>93993119
Being attracted to animated underaged teenagers doesn't inherently make you a pedophile/ephebophile because they aren't real. They don't mature like real children, their age is slapped on but meaningless.

I'm not attracted to real girls under 16, but I'll dip the age lower for animated girls because they'll draw a 14 year old curvy with perky tits (see Raven). Stop assuming random shit. No ones in denial except for you, faggot.

>>93993161
Source?

>>93993158
Because usually animated kiddie porn doesn't leave as much of a trace is real porn.

To even get real kiddie porn you'd have to go to dubious sources, whereas with animated kiddie porn you just go on /aco/.

Most people who get arrested are busted for having real kiddie porn as well.

File: Gumball.png (184KB, 1024x1489px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 1024x1489px

>>93993121
So Gumball is fair game?

>>93993255
Sorry but I honestly forgot myself. Hopefully someone will post it.

File: 1489787928981.png (122KB, 432x455px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 432x455px

>tfw there are still a few characters from your childhood that haven’t been tainted with R34

>>93993306
It's French, I know that.

>>93989963
Nothing is off limits. Sexualize Everything! ALL HAIL THE MIGHTY BONER!

>>93993288
Yeah cause he doesn't look like a real child, he's some weird cat. Plus he doesn't look under ten he looks like a young teen maybe
14 or 13.

>>93993119
the age of fictional characters doesn't mean jack shit because often times cartoon kids are characterized as having adult brains and so would be able to give consent
just like beating your meat to furries doesn't make you a zoophile because furries can "consent" (theoretically, since they're fictional) and have human mannerisms
that's why we can have 200yo lolis, fictional age is bullshit

>>93992042
kill yourself asap.

>>93993391
he looks 10 to me

>>93992323
It's like they say. If a guy says he's not a pedophile, then he's clearly given the idea of diddling a kid some solid consideration.

>>93993161
This hits a bit too close to home.

>>93991921
Shut the fuck up, Boco

File: thing.jpg (131KB, 600x401px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 600x401px

>>93992042

>>93993026
Source?

>>93989963

>that one super on model comic of hobbes having sex with himself

Not very nsfw but I don't feel like getting banned.

IMO children, and non anthropomorphize anything should probably avoid being sexualized. I mean nothings actually off limits, and I don't find much issue with it if it's off character or doesn't reflect real proportions or anatomy too heavily. Childrens probably the biggest issue as it sets a bad precedents.

>>93992696
Family guy doesn't count, I'm sure your dumpster is nice and comfy.

>>93993766
I never told you which character I drew porn of though

>>93993026
sauce please

>>93992042
>>93993612
It's funny how Boco acts in such a self-deprecating manner that it backfires and just makes him look more pathetic.

>>93993872
None of them count anon, now go do something actually dirty like secret of NIMH porn or something dare to live a little why don't you

>>93993977
who said I never drew that too

>>93994006
You since you never brought it up in the first place, unless you'd like to admit you were retarded enough to think family guy would have more of an impact in this thread than /co/'s sacred mouse waifu.

File: Yotsuba.jpg (36KB, 300x403px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 300x403px

>>93989963
Pic related is obviously off-limits. Technically not /co/, but OP didn't specify.

Aside from that...I guess on-model Uncle Grandpa? Just for revulsion's sake? It probably exists, but I'm having a hard time imagining anyone liking it.

>>93994076
Well I genuinely did not know she was sacred, I thought toddler lewds would have been more scandalous but whatever

>>93993666

milf fur, bunch of it on 8muses

>>93994124
Not for an adult show though. It's all about corrupting the friends of our youth.

>>93993026
>yet not part 3

Poo and piglet was ok, but I want see as look rabbit, kanga or eeyor.

>>93993340
>>93993306
>>93993255
Les Kassos

>>93994079
>Pic related is obviously off-limits
She has two doujins by Shindol. Guess the content.

>>93996131

Go ahead, post some of it here. See what happens.

>>93996155
Whatever you say Boco

>>93996370
somehow I'm glad it's censored, the dialogue doesn't look very promising

File: IMG_0701.jpg (401KB, 600x436px) Image search: [Google]

401KB, 600x436px

>>93990140

>>93989963
It's kinda like that argument 'there are some things that shouldn't be joked about'. That's not really true, it's all freedom of expression, but that doesn't automatically mean it needs to be done. If people act out against it, they have every right to be, cuz freedom of expression doesn't equate to freedom from criticism or backlash

But yeah, it'd be nice if you didn't sexualize C&H characters

File: 1476373126782.jpg (128KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 900x900px

>>93989963
there are no limits

>>93993313
Never forget rule 34a
If it exists and there ISN'T porn of it, someone WILL make it.

File: Rainbrow Brite.jpg (104KB, 590x750px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 590x750px

>>93989963

Do you mean as they are or "aged up"?

I don't really see a problem with drawing some character as an adult and having porn of them as adults. The porn character usually looks nothing like the cartoon character anyway. And the cartoon character before that doesn't look like a real kid, act like a real kid, or sound like a real kid a lot of the time, either.

So take your standard drawing of a sexy generic adult woman, and the caption says it's supposed to be Hermione or some crap, or the drawing of a generic porn woman if wearing what looks like a Hogwarts uniform.

I don't see why that kind of thing would ever appeal to pedophiles. Wouldn't pedophiles draw adult characters as children instead of the other way around? Since they're only attracted to children.

The argument just seems strange to me. That pedophiles spend all their time trying to find porn of doodles that act like, are written by, and played by adults...turned into actual adults. I think it's time to turn in your pedophile card if you can only be attracted to adults so you make everyone an adult.

>>93989963
the only limits are taste, sources, and what you are willing to risk to either seek or be the source

>>93996549
Well, that's just funny, like Cho Aniki.

>>93990404
>>93990498
Hit and miss. Unless it's just one or two guys drawing their poorly drawn, weird and completely unrelated fetishes.

It's happened before and it terrifies me.

>>93989963
I say nothing is off limits since its fictional characters.

>>93989963
>>93990140

I am decepcioned that people arent posting the Rule 63 versions of these characters on the /co/ Booru.

>>93993152
You make the same mmistake everyone else does. You mistake "mental capacity" with "legal capacity".

>>93990140
>kanga
too late

File: 1498663671666.gif (401KB, 336x256px) Image search: [Google]

401KB, 336x256px

>>93998500
>you are now aware that, in a children's fantasy book, somebody successfully fucked and impregnated a stuffed kangaroo

>>93998624
The baby kangaroo plush, Roo, probably came with Kanga has some sort of special when the plush was bought. Roo wasn't actually part of the orginal real collection of plushes actually. Either way, since the 100 acre woods is made from Christopher's imagination imagine how it and its inhabitants will change once he hits puberty and discovers he likes tits and ass and such.

>>93996681
Not yet they haven't. Probably never will too, they're obscure as fuck.

>>93998920
Tell me