Why don't comedy cartoons have production values on pare

>>93838724
Why would any cartoon channel or animation studio spend a ton of money on a comedy show's animation and styling when the core part of the show is the humor itself?

>>93838724
>spending so much money on production values that you can only afford 4 episodes

animation is expensive, and I imagine the profits aren't great for tv cartoons

>>93838724
>Why don't comedy cartoons have production values on pare or better then this in this day of age?

Castlevania looked so nice cause, like a lot of 80's OVAs people like to jerk off, most of the "animation" are still images with maybe a few things in movement. It's obvious the entire budget went into the last episode.

If a comedy looks too serious, no one will be able to take it seriously as a comedy.

>>93838763
This is why.

http://www.indiewire.com/2017/05/animaniacs-reboot-steven-spielberg-amblin-1201817336/

Also Castlevania:TAS is only $200,000 a episode, thats not alot of money for a cartoon.

>>93838793
Explain why they had that amount of effort when they were made for theaters then besides budget.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4831nu

File: P6XduSJ.gif (133KB, 311x366px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 311x366px

>>93838724
>talks about cartoons
>posts anime

>>93838922
No Japanese studio is attached to this, it's done by a Korean studio (Mua Film).

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt6942612/companycredits?ref_=tt_dt_co

>>93838922
It's an anime-esque.

>>93838724
HYDRO STORM

File: tumblr_oeykf0ugib1vpu8glo3_500.gif (2MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x281px

>>93839000
Yeah, I noticed similarities to Japanese animes too.