Should 3D viewings of movies still exist? I saw the new Spider-Man

>A gay man who doesn't have sex with men.

So...He's a cuckold?
Or does he just play women exclusively in games that give him the choice?

>>93719368
He fucks traps

>>93719368
He is playing a gay character and he is a method actor, so for now he says he is a gay man without the being attracted to men thing.

>>93719359
Well Anon is a whatever and he doesn't have sex either.

>>93719496
That's true.

>>93719359
Yeah, the new 3D doesn't really do it for me. But then again, I wear glasses and can't find the right way to wear both, and I might see 3D anyway due to movie times and work.

Until Doctor Strange, I hadn't seen a Marvel movie in 3D since the first Avengers. I only saw it in 3D because it was the first screening, like 9am screening on Opening Day. The first 2D screening was 10:30am or something.
I thought Doc Strange would be good in 3D because of all the mirror dimension stuff... yeah no it sucked.

There are only two movies I've seen that I think the 3D really worked well in;
>How to Train Your Dragon
>Jackass 3D

File: Your-Childs-Vision-Development-.jpg (89KB, 725x512px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 725x512px

>>93719359
>It was too blurry half the time and I had to take off the glasses alot of times just to get a break
It's ok, anon. You'll grow into it.

>>93719359
No, but every theaters bought the tecno to air it and now have to use it.

File: 1490187577630.gif (3MB, 540x200px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 540x200px

>>93719359
>Should 3D viewings of movies still exist?

not a question for /co/

>>93719359
3D is a shitty gimmick that belongs on 10-20 minute amusement park rides, not hour long movies.

>>93719780

jackass 3 was actually filmed with 3d cameras so it looked insane in the theater

everything else adds digital 3d and it looks like dog shit

>>93719994
And also those super-slo-mo hi-def phantom cameras.

But I was talking more about content.
Jackass used it's 3D well. The opening, where they're shooting paintballs and the balls are flying of the screen looks fantastic.
And HtTYD's flying scenes were beautiful.

I'd thought that even if it wasn't shot in 3D, the mirror dimension scenes in Doctor Strange would look good, because they'd mostly be CG, but they were so underwhelming.

>>93719359
I remember seeing the first Avengers in 3D and it didn't do much for the movie, it's pretty pointless unless it's actually filmed in 3D like some of the Transformers movies and whatnot, and not just converted afterwards.

>>93719359
I avoid 3d unless is really special like Dr Strange. The glasses are so fucking uncomfortable and things seem slightly out of focus and I keep shifting the glasses every few seconds thinking it's the distance from my face. I hate close up stuff, that DOES make everything go out of focus for me and it takes me 1 or 2 seconds for my eyes to see what's going on again.

>>93719606
I had to see WW 3d because I couldnt make it to an earlier showtime and had that same issue. I got glasses a few months ago after eye surgery and can see fine for the most part so I took them off but even having to wear them seemed annoying to me. If it had 3d parts in it like all 3d movies used to (as gimmicky as those scenes are) it would be kind of ok but that wasnt worth a more expensive ticket

>>93719780
Kubo worked well in 3d I thought