This extremely mediocre Spidey movie is still better than the rest of the MCU. Sony probably prevented it from fully sucking.
So prove Sony doesn't suck.
>>93717597
untrue, they made amazing spiderman happen, which was complete garbage
>>93717597
Wow this is a totally unheard of opinion, anon, it really needed it's own thread.
>>93717597
Question, does it mention at any point about the relationship of the Avengers?
>>93717597
>Sony probably prevented it from fully sucking.
Go away Sony intern, don't you have the Emoji movie to advertise now?
Yeah, they have such a great track record
>>93717597
Everyone we have a contrarian here. He is very special and don't make fun of his weight.
>>93719421
How was his post "edgy"? That word is overused as much as "cringe" is.
>>93719433
or "mediocre".
>>93719445
I never see that word overused at all, what is your point?
>>93719433
>Judging the picture in the post ay lmao
>>93718042
>>93718090
Maybe but they made Raimi Spider-man happen.
>>93720234
No, Raimi made Raimi's Spider Man movies happen.
What happened when Sony got involved?
The shitty ass mess that was Spider Man 3, that's what happened.
And what happens when Sony gets involved in the beginning of a new trilogy? Amazing Spider Man 2.
You'll see, I know you want some company wars like the good ol /v/ermin faggot that you are, but unlike Fox with their management of the X-Men line (most of the time), Sony has always been kind of shitty fuck-ups.
>>93720464
>What happened when Sony got involved?
>Spider Man 3
Okay. You got me.Spider-man 3 was funny tho
>>93717597
How can one person be so wrong
>>93720484
I can admit that some scenes were pretty fun, like the "So good" thing or most of Tobey's scenes, but... yeah, those scenes were drown by the excess of villains, twists and plots in the movie.
>>93717597
No Spider-Man movies are good.
>>93718090
I love this movie.
>>93720644
damn...