Why is the new spiderman doing such lame villains. Owl man? Lame.

>>93623006
I like Mysterio too but you're a faggot talking shit on Vulture and Keaton

>>93623006
Mysterio? I think I had a bowl of Mysterios for breakfast.

Didn't Spidey and Deadpool ran over him and put him in a coma?

File: spider-man-knights-015-owl.jpg (28KB, 300x285px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 300x285px

>see OPs post
>"Owl Man"
>think for a second that they're going to stick a low tier spidey crimeboss in the movie

File: mysterios.jpg (40KB, 468x237px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 468x237px

How many Mysterio stories that don't literally involve faustian deals are solved by

>"These illusions are so convincing! I know, I'll trust my spider-sense!"

?

Also, you'd think he could make a fortune performing in Vegas or something. Why still with the crime?

>>93624695
Nope, he did get an honorable mention in Daredevil though

>>93624760
You might as well ask why villains who can build weather control devices or teleportation belts rob banks.

Anybody surprised that Beast Wars Megatron once voiced Mysterio?

>Villain know for using Special Effects made by Sony

I don't know, then again Disney and WB use Sony Imageworks so nothing will change. But I'm expecting some Ghostbusters remake tier effects. Would also be Funny if Mysterio worked for Sony in the movie.

>>93623006
Mysterio as a villain would probably end up with a lot of visual effects that would be too similar to some of the ones in Doctor Strange.

A different villain works in different stories. Mysterio is good for mindfucks and cool visuals. Venom is good for that visceral, to-the-bone kind of conflict, and Green Goblin is there for that very personal vendetta.

For example.