>Peter, what are we doing here?
>Well, women will always band together to stop an offensive art exhibit from coming to town, so I've arranged for all my photos of baby wieners to be put on display.
>Oh, Peter, I'm gonna have to call the police on this.
>What? Why? It's to get our wives back together!
>Peter, these are HUNDREDS of naked babies in suggestive situations! And they're time stamped as far back as 1998, which is WAY before we had this idea!
>I need help!
Why the fuck was this allowed?
>>93306834
Lol fox doesn't give a shit as long as family man makes some sort of yummy money in reruns
also what are the average views on a premier for this now a days
we like family guy here
>>93307019
This doesn't have 666 trips but I'll still assume it was posted from hell
>>93306834
Because Seth McFarlane is the only reason Fox still gets any viewers
>>93307253
Good sir, I regret to inform you that people still excitedly tune in for modern Simpsons
>>93307357
Excitedly is a strong word
>>93307253
this
i remember when they had actual shows on, NEW SHOWS every year too
they can't even be arsed to bring back Cops
>>93306834
Eh, they've done the whole "this is fucked for a premise/cartoon" schtick before a few times already. The first one I remember was when Connie Demico was knocked out and Peter laid down on her and he said to the camera "shut up its a cartoon".
>>93306834
>And they're time stamped as far back as 1998, which is WAY before we had this idea!
kek
>>93306834
Why not? It was funny.