>tfw your not excited for your favorite superhero's film

>>93272001
He really is ugly. Hollandfags must be memeing or something to find this thing attractive.

>>93272001
Parker is not supposed to be handsome. The fact that you complain that you don't find him pretty implies you misunderstand the essence of the character and that you're a low quality fan to begin with. Casuals like you have done a lot of damage to Spider-Man over the past few decades.

Plus his suit is shitty and a major downgrade from TASM2

File: bestspidermanevah.jpg (165KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1920x1080px

>>93272357
tobey will always be the best spiderman anyway

>>93272001
We already had Maguire though

File: peter-600x910 1.jpg (144KB, 600x910px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 600x910px

>>93272357
Ultimate peter parker is clearly a cute and handsome young boy and is obviously what they were trying to emulate until they casted the ugly fiend known as tom holland.

>>93272001
Imagine asa fucking butterfield playing spider-man GAWD that would be terrible.

>>93272357
Peter has always been attractive. You're the casual here.

>>93272543
He would have aced it if he just put on some muscle.

They cast him so you could relate to him easier OP

>>93272001
Should've made a spiderman film with one of the twinks from any of the X-Men reboot trilogy.

>>93272001
For me its the third spiderman franchise with the same premise Peter in High School.

I feel like Spidey's new movie has to be over-analyzed just because it's the only hope for a decent Peter Parker that actually means something and isn't Slott.

>>93272357
I don't disagree with you about Parker wasn't supposed to be handsome, but that was really just Ditko's thing. It only took one artist after to completely make him handsome.

But it is pointless because they didn't cast Holland to be "average teenage boy" and is instead supposed to be seen as attractive.

File: 1484112000825.jpg (12KB, 289x336px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 289x336px

>>93272001
He looks decent enough but the main selling point of him is that he's a pretty good actor who looks young enough to play Spiderman unlike every other actor anyone would suggest to replace him. He's not a complete Chad like Andrew Garfield, he's dorky enough that you can actually imagine him getting stuffed into a locker. Peter's a fucking loser most of the time and that was sorely missing from both Amazing Spiderman movies

>>93272479

This is the ultimate proof of /co/'s contrarianism.

File: Andrew-Garfield-Spider-Man.jpg (142KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1024x1024px

>>93272479
Yeah sure

>>93272001
>>93272479
>>93272718
>three separate reboots and still not a single attractive actor has played Spiderman

>>93272809
I don't know what your talking about. Toby looked like he could have been a modern runway model. Andrew Garfield looks normal attractive. Tom Holland is just plain ugly though.

File: peterparker.png (89KB, 310x209px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 310x209px

He reminded me of the 90s cartoon Parker, but as a teenager.

File: high school Parker.jpg (27KB, 398x303px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 398x303px

>>93273303
No, that was him I college. Thus was him in highachool.

>>93272718
Garfield was shit-tier and set the character back a decade

>>93273368
Fuck I'm tired.

File: images.jpg (5KB, 284x177px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 284x177px

>>93272902
>Toby looked like he could have been a modern runway model

No.

>>93272594
I would have been a great Peter/ Spiderman anon

File: 1300047578877.jpg (36KB, 258x322px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 258x322px

>>93272357
>Parker isn't handsome.
>He's constantly fucking the hottest chicks in NYC, sometimes two-timing them.

Sure thing, bud.

>>93273935
I'm not saying he's attractive to me but it's clear to me that he has those sharp features and piercing eyes that a lot of the modern male models have.

It was never going to be Donald Glover.

Didn't know Spider-Man fans wanted hot dudes. Maybe if Singer was director

>>93272001

Not for the same reasons because I agree with this.. >>93272357 Parker isn't supposed to be handsome because he's a social outcast, a position you don't get into if you're incredibly handsome. So him not looking as good makes better since for the character.

But that's why I hate Holland because he's too pretty-boy and playing Peter as a normie-as-fuck kid.

>>93272564
>>93274456
>>93272698

>Peter Parker is handsome and cute

>Peter Parker is a social outcast constantly getting bullied and teased by people like Flash Thompson and Eddie Brock.

Pick one and only one normies. It's not Peter Parker bitches want it's SPIDERMAN because he can actually be confident under the mask, displaying his full power and abilities. Hence the dichotomy between the two alter egos.

If you don't get this, you don't get Spider-Man. Which you guys or Marvel even gets.

>>93272718

>Andrew 'tiny head' Garfield
>Best Spider-Man

Pick one.

>these people are apparently ugly
either these posters are jealous or I'm a 3/10. could be both

>>93274857
>If you don't get this, you don't get Spider-Man. Which you guys or Marvel even gets.
>muh headcanon is canon

Wew lad.

>>93272001
>implying you wouldn't have all found issue with whomever was picked

>>93274857
This is entry level spidey shit. You're only showing how much of a casual you are by thinking Parker hasn't gotten past that. Flash Thompson? Eddie Brock? What is this, the nineties?

>>93274568
And non of the height

>>93272001
It could be worse at least his appearance can be hidden with makeup, the Spidey mask, and cg.
Ain't shit to hide his godawful acting.

File: 13456789876567890.jpg (255KB, 1114x1043px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 1114x1043px

>>93274701
Singer's taste is pretty meh compared to Matthew Vaughn's. Just look at all the high quality twinks the latter has discovered over the years.

>Kick Ass
>Kingsman
>X-Men First Class

Delicious.

>>93274901
>Andrew 'tiny head' Garfield

Tiny head on a giraffe neck, no less.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (71KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1280x720px

>>93275404
I also heard he loves lasagna and hates Mondays.

>>93272357
>Parker is not supposed to be handsome.
Peter Parker was stated to be good looking a dozen times since his creation, he got literally dozens of lovers in less than a decade, when teenagers there was 3 girls fighting for his attention.

Sorry Peter was never the "loser nerd relatable" that casuals try project,he was a teenager Bruce wayne without the money.

Spider-Man fucking sucks now, why haven't you spiderfags figured it out yet?
He's the Bill Dauterive of the Marvel Universe, he may have been a cool guy in the past, but now he's nothing but a disappointment and a shame. Give up on this shitty franchise and stop subjecting yourself to bullshit because they put the Spider-Man label on it.

>>93275092
>What is this, the canon?
>t. aggressively under age

File: 1497481993779.jpg (133KB, 500x570px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 500x570px

>>93275586
I'd describe 90% of modern comics that way so i don't see the difference. Call me a faggot, but i literally find joy with these characters only in secondary material lie movies and occasionally games (with a few exceptions those tend to suck too these days), i imagine because they're more condensed experiences

I like the character because in all these years he got plenty of decent to awesome material. If the new movie can make me relive some of that then good, otherwise I'll just go back to the old stuff

>>93272711
This

>>93275763
Batman is still good, Superman after rebirth is great again,wonder woman slowed down with rebirth but is still good.

Marvel is the problem

>>93275486
Kek

>>93275880
Whatever floats your boat. I think the problem is comics/big 2 as a whole. This isn't just about SJW problems that plague Marvel, the industry is simply a tiring mess. No amount of rationalizing will make me think that, for example, bringing Watchmen in the DC universe is anything more than a cheap and awkwardly written marketing tactic

That being said I'm curious about Superdad, sooner or later I'll check it out. There are gems in the rough undoubtedly

>>93276010
Bringing Watchmen is also my main problem with rebirth and the reason I fear its future. But otherwise it's being a surprisingly good relaunch.

>>93275681
>What is this, the canon?
>20+ years ago

What is the passage of time, anon? Parker's changed a lot since then. You should probably pick up a comic book.

>>93272479
>Phil Lamarr
This guy really is in everyfuckingthing

>>93272570
Did you SEE Ms Perigrine?

>>93273368
Everyone always complains about Peter being too built in this show, but its cool that they actually showed he wasn't always hueg, but rather that was something he grew into. Also Spidey wasn't that skinny in the 70's and 80's, he was average superhero size; everyone just applies the 90's/Ultimate Sider-man idea of a skinny Spider-man when the cartoon was made in the early 90's.

File: December2904.jpg (114KB, 664x810px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 664x810px

>>93276752
>What is the passage of time, anon? Parker's changed a lot since then.

Has it now?

>>93272543
Asa Butterfield is at least really pretty. Just a very wooden actor.

>>93272001
I...think he's kind of hot.

File: 1471388716023.jpg (39KB, 374x347px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 374x347px

I don't know why, but reading through this thread makes me think that deep down we're really just a bunch of little girls thirsting after our ideal version of Spider-cock.

And I don't mean this in a bad way.

File: 15678909876500.jpg (73KB, 600x808px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 600x808px

>>93277145
>that nigger is 20 years old now

Jesus Christ, I'm old.

>>93272001

Is Zendaya MJ? cause I could get behind that

>>93277311
Nobody knows.

>>93274456
Arent most of those love interests girls that are all over him looking for some Spidey-Dick? Because in that case they wouldnt know aside from the little theyve seen over the years of him in a torn up costume. Not denying that he isnt a unibrowed neaderthal but they have no idea what he looks like and just crave some upside down crazy acrobatic sex in a web of lust hanging off the edge of a skyscraper.

File: bitches love spider-man.jpg (2MB, 1826x1157px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1826x1157px

>>93277845
>Arent most of those love interests girls that are all over him looking for some Spidey-Dick?
Well, obviously.

File: tom's favorite position.gif (2MB, 268x370px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 268x370px

C'mon guys, he's not that bad.

>>93279310
>manlet
>hideous face

He's shit.

>>93274783
kek no, you can be a social outcast if you're autistic despite being handsome.

I don't think I will ever be excited for another Spider-Man movie. I've been disappointed too many times and Sony keeps fucking up after over a decade of tries.

At least Netflix is doing good with my boy Daredevil going on strong for a third season and Defenders

>>93279310
it's young Cyclops all over again, he's fucking hideous

I still haven't watched Apocalypse because of that shit

Am I alone in not finding Tom Holland ugly?

>>93279310
boo fucking hoo the gayfags on /co/ don't wanna pump him with their degenerate cum. Hilarious that there's an entire thread devoted to the homos mad that they can't fap to spidey for a few years.

>>93279851
>the gayfags on /co/ don't wanna pump him with their degenerate cum
Ido

>>93279851
the straights had their WW threads, everyone deserves a turn to bitch

>>93272001
same
i wouldn't care that he's a manlet if he weren't so fucking short

>>93274857
>>Peter Parker is a social outcast constantly getting bullied and teased by people like Flash Thompson
????
but thats wrong?
Flash didn't even really bully him until he was Spider-Man and started talking mad shit unprovoked.

fuck off you casual

>>93277845
>Arent most of those love interests girls that are all over him looking for some Spidey-Dick?
no?
Most of his love interests are interested in Peter, not spidey

>>93276991
yeah, but he was skinny in the 60s.
Ditko true him intentionally lanky, and attention was drawn to it multiple times.
Romita and alot of the 70s/80s artists true him with a generic superhero build though, yeah

>>93277311
I wish, but.
i really really wish
>>93279310
>>93279310
ugh
god, he's hideous
he's not even average.

>>93279755
>I don't think I will ever be excited for another Spider-Man movie. I've been disappointed too many times and Sony keeps fucking up after over a decade of tries.
yeah, but the problem isn't *just* sony.
Ths Raimi films were on Raimi (relying on archtypes to make the film instead of being true to the characters)

The webb films are on Sony yeah.

Homecoming is on marvel, and their shitty direction.

They need to give control of spider-man over to someone who is both GOOD and competent, but also loves the character and can delegate well.
I dont know who that is though

Do you think theres any hope that they'd recast Holland?

not reboot, just recast

File: 143567897654678900.png (119KB, 225x227px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 225x227px

>>93279778
>I still haven't watched Apocalypse because of that shit

I was disappointed in how ugly young Scott is, but I ended up getting a boner for young Nightcrawler so it wasn't a total loss.

Still forever bitter that they wasted James Marsden in the original films though, he's a total cutie.

>>93279834
No, /hm/ is obsessed with him because they have notoriously shitty taste.

>>93280116
Bryan Singer pls.

>>93281975
Oh please, Singer would never pass up fucking him.