Are there any comic reviewers out there who actually talk about

File: Hmm.png (146KB, 553x459px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 553x459px

>>93265235
Trying to start a CA thread, are you? HMMMMMMMM?!

If you're hipster enough to read non capeshit, you're hipster enough to find a reviewer

>>93267810
Noncape readers are so hipster, they don't even have a name for the genre of books they read. They can only call it "noncape"

"Indie" isn't entirely accurate because books like Walking Dead aren't indipendent.

>>93265235
There are but its mostly women talking about things like Saga, Paper Girls, and Giant Days.

File: 1424312440583.jpg (136KB, 622x650px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 622x650px

>>93265235
I do reviews for like 3 years and want to make more reviews for unknown comics and webcomics, but I don't have or can't get many subs, so I can't break from the Marvel/DC/Popular comics shithole that attracts people.

>>93269556
You're problem is that you can't get views and you're worried about doing videos that won't get views?

File: Riiser's Webcomic Relief_last12month.jpg (329KB, 1128x775px) Image search: [Google]

329KB, 1128x775px

>>93265235
Riiser's Webcomic Relief

>>93270785
Webcomics aren't real comics fuck off

>>93270979
I agree. If a tree isn't sacrificed then it lacks all artistic merit.

>>93267860
Interesting point about the term "Indie."
However, I think the phrase still kind of holds. After all, independent just refers to anyone not DC or Marvel.

>>93270979
what if they're printed?
Maybe next OP could specify the precise inclusion criteria.
Here's another reviewer of sequential art:
http://deconstructingcomics.com/?cat=3

tcj although they mostly host interviews these days, still a good resource for finding new comics though

>>93270728
It's techniqual conundrum.
One one side, I can post my videos on different places and more people will see them
On the other side, all my reviews from indie companies, shared my review from their twitter, but it didn't raise my views at all.
It's hard to decide.

File: sleepyreader666.jpg (319KB, 1126x778px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 1126x778px

>>93265235
sleepyreader666, but he also includes superhero stuff

>>93272663
>old fart
No thanks

>>93272681
>wanting somebody young and inexperienced over someone seasoned who actually knows wtf he's talking about.

>>93270979

>Comic strips aren't real comics

Great one graphic novel fag

>>93272352
>more people will see them
If barely anyone's looking at them now then who cares? Just learn to SEO better and make sure you hit the three weekly video minimum.

Are there any comic reviewers out there who actually talk about something other than a summary of what happens in the comic and their generalized subjective opinion of it?

No really. Point me to someone who talks about themes, syntax, panel composition, contrast, etc.

>>93274309
If they knew any of that shit they would be making comics instead of staring cow-eyed into a camera.

>>93274349
If comics were respected and the breadth of content that sells was more diverse, you'd see people like novel and film critics (who incidentally shy away from studying "childish" work more often than not, fancy that) who study and analyze the media without making it themselves.

But you're right. Everyone who gives enough of a shit already makes comics.

>>93274309
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYJAToPH5GSGShP7Yoc3jsA

>>93274309
TCJ as mentioned above