Should I read this? I followed the Cyclops' chart to understand

>>92494945
It's pretty good. Go for it.

File: 1461686074876.jpg (77KB, 396x750px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 396x750px

>>92494964
Looks like marvel still putting it out. I will give it a shot. Thanks.
Also this is the chart that I used. I wonder what could have been of the extinction team if bendis didnt had fucked everything so bad. Jesus christ I hate this man; I thought it was a meme.

>>92494945
I have all the issues, it was pretty fucking good man. Gets a little dodgy with the end of the world stuff at the end, but it's a hell of a ride.

>>92494945
Bunn's probably the single best Magneto writer since Claremont and this book was the start of him writing the character so yes, it's well worth it. Probably helped to save his reputation too after the meandering, directionless shit show that was Fearless Defenders.

>>92494945
As a Magneto fan I loved it. Even if it felt a bit diverted towards the end with the end of the world, they worked it in amazingly well.

>>92496542
Bunn was only good for antiheroes
His best work at DC was Siniestro

>>92495124
This list is technically incomplete since it was made before Cyclops' death/the end of the "Marvel NOW!" era for Scott. The stuff that comes after Uncanny X-men that features him is:
>Hickman's Avengers #38 & #42
>Secret Wars
>Death of X

>>92494945
Prepare for AWESOME

People just enjoy hating on Bunn.

Not everything he has done is gold but his Magneto and Sinestro are fantastic anti hero greatness.

>>92494945
Bunn is generally solid with anti-heroes

>>92497429
>Bunn is generally solid with anti-villains
Fixed.