How come 3d movies always try to be realistic and the same mold

>Sausage Party

>>92410898
Undyne, go shove your fishtits somewhere else

File: ff378a4a362fe33c9973608fca8a1ce7.png (525KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

525KB, 1280x720px

Plus you would think the success of stuff like RWBY, wether good or not, would lead to more people trying to ape it and do 3d action shows online.

>>92410936

Thematically, sure, but visually, even though it was the point, it still just looked like any other 3d kids movie.

File: fd48a8dbdecf839a9ab822fb5bf701cd.png (542KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

542KB, 1280x720px

>>92410949
But u want to talk about

3 D

animation

>>92411059
Stop groping yourself and get back to licking ner lizard ass

and while you're at it, head back to the board where you're relevant >>>/v/
Not that they like talking about you anyway. Hell, they don;t even like talking about vidya, period.

File: I'm gonna need a source for this.png (32KB, 232x225px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 232x225px

Please, OP.
Filename very related.

>>92410898
keep posting ahegao fish

File: 1475840804586.png (93KB, 1250x1012px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 1250x1012px

>>92410898
because i can count the amount of ridges on this rig

>>92410898
>>92411001
>>92411059

I want to fuck that lesbian fish lady.

>>92410898
source on the fish tits?

>>92411875
You mean Undyne?

I think that's the model from the "If Undertale was Realistic" series.

>>92411875
a md5 search indicates that the artist is "uwotinfokm8" if that's what you're asking

File: Come at me bro.png (81KB, 384x419px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 384x419px

>>92413625
I'm sorry, I should have phrased that differently.
I knew the character but was looking for the origin of the 3D model and the pics that OP posted.
Thanks for your help, anon, I'll check that!
>>92413755
Thank you!

>>92413557
https://pastebin.com/Xf3GR6TA

>>92414152
Wow, that's alot of fish.

>>92414313
And yet, it's still not enough.

>>92414449
I agree, but good work nonetheless.

>>92411001
If you mean visually, it's largely because rigging faces that can emote at a professional level is hard as shit. A lot of "independent" works mess up the mouth in one way or another, but manage to largely downplay it to the point where it isn't noticeable (such as intentionally only using the limited expressions that look right with the model). If you try that shit in any higher-budget production, it sticks out a lot more.

So most animators stick to facial layouts that are known to animate well.

>>92410898
>>92411001
>>92411059
more?