Are there any comics from a first-person perspective?Aside from that one issue of Swamp Thing.
bumping with the scene before that
>>92325538
I'd like to say yes OP but I cant think of any
It really doesn't make any sense in a comic because there's no illusion. Without motion it doesn't feel like you're actually looking through their eyes, it just feels like you're looking at a picture of their hands.
>>92325538
Pretty sure I've read this webcomic online that was a succession of one panel pages, each being in first person from the point of view of the person/animal/mirror reflection/etc. that the character from the previous panel was looking at, and taking place in the same second in time, and forming a complete loop. Can't recall what it was called, but I think it was on a French website.
First persons in comics are pull seem like a pretty big waste in panels you can get any angle you want in a comic why would you stick with FP since it's the most constricting
>>92326786
And yet the Moore issue of Swamp Thing worked beautifully. And the scene in the OP is excellent, even if the rest of the comic isn't like that.
>>92325538
There was an issue of Cerebus that did this
>>92327953
Which one?
>>92326867
it's unique and underutilized
it's always cool to see unconventional/experimental stuff like that
>>92329230
Don't know, sorry
I just clicked on a random issue
>>92329230
>>92331262
Cerebus issue #89.
And it was a dream sequence too.
>>92331385
Thanks for the info.
>>92326788
that sounds weird
>>92326656
lol wat.
>>92331262
How did you even know that if you didn't know the issue?
>>92325538
I don't know who did it first or when, but EC Comics had some war stories partly using FPS view decades before they became real.
>>92338360
That sounds awesome. Do you know the names of any of the stories or should I just start looking through random EC war comics issues?
>>92338544
It's been months since I read them, but they were in Frontline Combat. Maybe in other titles too.
>>92325538
It's about a dude stalking a girl.
that's cool, but hard on the artist I would guess