Looking for specific male sexualization in comics (Read everything

>>92226316
no. quit being a fag

>>92226316
>VentoAureo.jpg

Mike.

Hand me the batteries.

Bigby Wolf gets a very brief (~4 panels) nude scene in Fabels Volume 3: Storybook Love. It's not played for laughs, he's just a wild wolf man enjoying the wilderness as his waifu sleeps in for the morning. You see his full ass.

>>92226384
I said "male gay inclusion", and that the male needs to specifically be sexualized in the ways I described. Learn to read. Being nude isn't in itself sexualization - being nude is just being nude.

Virtually anything by Fred Perry

>>92226357
JoJo "sexualizes" males for laughs and has no proper male gay inclusion and is a manga NOT in color aside from covers, so it doesn't count.

>>92226421
He only sexualizes FEMALES. I asked for MALE sexualization in these specific ways. Learn to read.

>>92226316
Fuck off, autist.

Go ask in >>>/aco/ where it's actually relevant.

>>92226455
I clearly said I'm not looking for porn, idiot.

>>92226429

>JoJo "sexualizes" males for laughs

are you out of your goddam mind

every single fucking male character is fabulous as fuck

>>92226429
>for laughs
what, no. The fanbase finds it funny but the creator doesn't do it for laughs. He's just really into fashion.

>>92226540
Doesn't matter, it has no proper male gay inclusion either way, and it's still not colored.

File: Now you listen here.jpg (539KB, 1260x1230px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 1260x1230px

>>92226487
No, you're just having another go at making your last garbage thread so you can shitpost all over it.

You make a retardedly specific request, lure in people just trying to help out and then you get a blank check to shit all over them for DARING to not know the hyper specific thing you asked for. Just fuck off already.

>>92226316
>getting /co/ to do research for your medium/Mary Sue article
heh

>>92226579

are you implying that Dio is not gay for Jonathan

>>92226618
Gay subtext is NOT proper male gay inclusion.

>>92226579
the females are so masculine that it might as well be gay.

>>92226579
>no proper gay male inclusion
Who is Enrico Pucci?

>>92226634
Masculine females have nothing to do with male homosexuality, you fucking idiot.

File: CWE-F_xUEAAkDF1.png (51KB, 599x338px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 599x338px

>>92226655
>all art is subjective
>comics are art
>manga are technically comics
>jjba is a manga
>meaning it is art
>therefore it is subjective
>meaning in the context of araki's work one could infer that masculine women could be connected to homosexuality and not be incorrect
Huh...

Why the butt? Males are generally sexualized by showing them shirtless and showing off their washboard abs.

>>92226789
Because a lot of us gay and bi guys, plus a lot of straight and bi girls - contrary to belief - find male butts sexy. I didn't make this thread to be asked dumb pointless questions.

File: Tiziano + Squalo.jpg (984KB, 1560x1200px) Image search: [Google]

984KB, 1560x1200px

>>92226579
>>92226649
Who are Tiziano and Squalo?

>>92226316
>This thread, again.
>Asking for man buttcheeks while not nude, again, when people tend to prefer latex or tight pants on manbutt.

This is your final (You), use it wisely.

>>92226814
Most shots of manbutt are in tight clothes to accentuate it regardless of whether it's innocuous or porn. Nobody draws half covered butts because male underwear grips the butt or is completely loose while girl underwear tends to ride high. It's also even less practical than on a woman because male hips tend to be less well defined, their butts flatter, and anything with a high-riding design has to compensate for the dick and balls.

>>92227011
Male butts are often not flat, don't fucking lie. And there are man-thongs with a socket for your dick and balls, idiot.

>>92226971
They're not in your post... i mean... they aren't from parte five... they aren't from Jojo... they don't even have stands...

>Dear Buzzfeed
>For this column I went to that dreaded site known as 4chan
>I made a simple request to try and gauge how prevalent the male posterior is in the comic book medium
>Instead they just called me austistic and talked about anime

>>92227085
>Male butts are often not flat, don't fucking lie.
Not what I said.
>And there are man-thongs with a socket for your dick and balls, idiot.
That has nothing to do with what I said.

(You)'re clearly (You) fishing, so here (You) go.
(You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You)

>>92226316
Doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting different results is one of the clearer signs of insanity or strong mental deficiencies.

Making this thread again for instance.

File: 1444629590812.jpg (226KB, 560x577px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 560x577px

>>92226316
Want to know how I know you're a woman?

>>92226429
This is why you don't indulge an SJW, because they have literal double-think to dismiss anything that challenges their religion.

>>92226579
A lot of it was written in Japan in the 80's-90's- nobody would fucking include the gays, but it has some incredibly homoerotic overtones throughout.

File: 1337522971842.jpg (39KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 320x240px

>>92227733

>>92226316

Catman in Secret Six is Gail Simone's husbando. Lots of man candy there. Also, I think he does some shit with dudes in New 52, but I haven't read New 52 Secret Six.

Fuck off with your weird copy pasta dude.

>>92227827
I said male gay inclusion. And he isn't sexualized in my described ways at all.

>>92226446
>Perry only sexualizes females

Oh wow, we got an idiot here.

A fucking idiot.

>>92226814
>I didn't make this thread to be asked dumb pointless questions.
A bit hostile, aintcha?

>>92226316
If your criteria is so specific, why not make your own comic? It's a fact that most comics creators are straight men who aren't attracted to other men.

Not to mention you can't sexualize a man in the same way you do a woman and expect it to still be sexy.
Men's legs and butts are generally not considered as attractive as their arms and chests.
t. bisexual

>>92226316
Nightwing

File: football-players-carry-goalpost-steaua-bucharest-assistant-coach-pictured-moving-official-training-held-48552862.jpg (211KB, 1300x994px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 1300x994px

>>92226316
this thread

>>92226316
You've made this thread before.

>>92226316
Deadpool has all of those and I never noticed until now

>>92226316
How about midnighter

File: 922326-gd38_2.jpg (52KB, 400x348px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 400x348px

>>92226446
Oh geeze you know nothing.

Fred Perry draws two kinds of characters:
Mildly sexy.
Extremely Sexy.
This applies to both genders. Hell, there is an entire species whose males are perfect slabs of man-meat and completely naked, and also pure and innocent to a T. They are also MLP expies.

File: 1478363389171.jpg (57KB, 639x599px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 639x599px

If there's no material for such market (gay male (((inclusion)))) it means that the target audience is; too small or too poor to pay attention to it.

If you think there's no material of it, save some money, write some story and hire an artist that is willing to do your story. Otherwise stop shoving your sick preferences to others, please.

File: Gravity-Kid-and-Power-Boy.jpg (139KB, 423x387px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 423x387px

>>92226316
Deadpool. Or Gravity Kid and Powerboy are a gay couple who wear pretty silly skimpy outfits.

>>92226316
Grant Morrison's The Invisibles. Specifically the character of Lord Fanny.

File: DIG030431_2._SX312_QL80_TTD_.jpg (45KB, 312x483px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 312x483px

>>92229328
Found 'em. This image is SFW because they are all in *costumes* to go to a Halloween party. At a Sorority. Again: pure, innocent men.

>>92226316
>* Male gay inclusion.

>* Showing off any of the males' butt in a sexy outfit revealing skin on their legs and buttcheeks (similarly to how they usually do with female characters in comics).

I don't think you read comic books if you think the big 2 have done this since the 90s. Fetishwear approximating your OP image was primarily 1984-1995 and as social trends changed so did costumes.

No seriously, exposed buttcheeks in a cape costume?

If this is for coursework of yours, you need to be clear in your paper that your familiarity with the source material is weak. And no, other peoples' essays and blogposts don't count.

I'm not mad but I am disappointed that you'd need this information if you weren't already cognizant of the material and the disturbing idea that you could go on to paint yourself as some kind of knowledgeable person on the subject.

>>92227733
nobody would fucking include the gays,

the entire plot of devilman is centered on homolust and that from 1972

>>92227602
Dat Asuka.

Yo op you still here?

>>92228794
Femmy guys can have sexy legs and butts. Idiot.

>>92229328
Fred Perry draws really ugly beefcake dudes. I'm a gay dude, even I think his females are more attractive than his males. They just look retardedly deformed.

>>92229406
That's not what I specifically asked for.

>>92229411
Lord Fanny is from what I've been told a transgender woman, so that one doesn't count.

>>92229438
That idiot artist has something against male butts and make them all super-masculine and super-muscular, so it doesn't count.

>>92229441
They never show off a male butt in a thong with them bending over. So, come up with another lie, bitch.

>>92229839
>>92229648
>>92229699
You have a really endearing way of ignoring advice and calling everybody idiots. Really makes people want to help you find your scantily-clad-twink-but-not-porn comics.

These comics don't exist bro. You're looking for the 90's female bikini warrior aesthetic applied to guys. Nobody did that and nobody is doing it today.

>>92229839
You missed the point, show a modern superheroine costume that exposes buttcheeks before you get all pissy about an imagined trope of yours.

>>92226316
I commend you for making such a well-thought out bait post.

But anyways, lemme play along:

1. Male and female fashion is different. While some things (e.g. butts) are similarly attractive to both genders, other things are sexual in quite different ways. That's why when men are sexualized in the exact same way as women, it's done for comedy: because it looks ridiculous. You can sexualize men, but it's done differently than when you sexualize women.

You could stage an easy experiment. Go outside when it's hot, and note how many women show off their butts and thighs, and how many men do that. Men who wear shorts don't usually accentuate the thighs, and men also don't often wear butt-hugging leggings. So this difference in sex appeal isn't some fantasy invented by comic artists, it's based on real life choices made by men and women who want to look attractive.

2. What does male gay inclusion have to do with your second point or picture? There aren't many print comics with male OR female gay inclusion, altogether. Most comics with sexualized female characters don't have lesbian inclusion, either. This point turns what could have been a fair challenge, into an overly specific intentionally unwinnable request.

3. Men have been sexualized in print comic books. Not as often as women, but still they have been. If you just wanted to read a comic with some sexy beefcake in it, I could point you to some choice examples. But you aren't really interested in man ass. You want to make some sort of point. But what would that point be? You're telling us to "prove you wrong", but what about? That a comic that sexualizes a man in a very specific and unusual fashion, and also features gay male characters which is already a rarity in print comics, doesn't exist? It doesn't. But why should it exist? What implications does its nonexistence have?

[cont.]

>>92226316
I think you're looking for Grayson and Midnighter comics.

>>92230543
This whole fucking thread and only one person posts the right answer

>>92230472
[cont.]

If your point is that it would be a cool thing if such a comic existed, well, all the power to you! You can make it exist, at least in two different ways:
a) create it yourself;
b) or commission it.
To make it at least cost-effective in print, however, you'd have to have a market for it. You would have to do extensive social media work, as well as get some funding by using sites like Patreon and Kickstarter/Indiegogo. It could still flop, but at least you would try.

Somehow, though, I doubt that this is your intention. I suspect (correct me if I'm wrong), that the whole reason you concocted this very specific criteria for a challenge, was to make a certain point. And that point wasn't about how cool would it be to have a comic like that. No, I think the point you wanted to make is that comics that feature sexualized female characters shouldn't exist. Why do I think so? Because I've seen a lot of similar posts using similar challenges or arguments, that all tried to prove that same point. That comics with sexualized female characters should not exist.

Here's the deal though. Your challenge doesn't prove that. In fact, it proves nothing. It proves that a very specific type of comic doesn't currently exist on the print market. That most likely just means that there is no market for it. With some level of assumption, though, it might even mean that maybe some comic industry execs are homophobic. But even so, it still doesn't mean that comics with female sexualized characters shouldn't exist just because your imaginary comic doesn't.

There are lots of great artists out there who can draw sexy men. Go and support them. Have fun. Stop trying to shit on other people's fun, 'kay?

File: 2000AD071.jpg (153KB, 598x826px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 598x826px

>>92230739
P.S.: Have some Devlin Vaugh

>>92230380
Any comic by Frank Cho, to just give one example.

>>92230739
"Blah blah blah, I got no actual answer for you so let me lecture you about bullshit, blah blah blah."

I never questioned the norm, idiot. I asked for any exceptions from the norm. But that's apparently too much for your thick retarded skull to comprehend.

>>92226814
Wait OP is a gay/bi guy? Wut
Why do you care about how female superheroines are portrayed then? How is that relevant?

>>92226789
Sorry anon, but gotta side with OP here, a lot of women and gays tend to find male butts sexy. I'm not sure what's with OP's obsession with zettai ryouiki (aka naked thigh), but butts are a universal sexy body part.

>>92230543
They are never sexualized in the ways I described. And Dick Grayson isn't gay.

>>92230852
No need for ad hominems, OP. If you actually read my post, I explained why an actual answer to your request doesn't exist.

You didn't ask for an exception of the norm. You asked for a very specific type of male sexualization with unnecessarily complicated criteria, and then asked us to "prove you wrong". My post was an explanation as to why there's no point in "proving you wrong".

There's that comic book about the gay superhero team with a literal bear and a guy that's so gay he shits rainbows as he flies. I can't remember the name of it though.

>>92230983
It's not complicated. It's really simple, it's you making it complicated because you're dumb but want to be pretentious about being dumb.

File: MOCKBIRD2016002_int3_3.jpg (196KB, 1032x1566px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 1032x1566px

>>92230818
Here's what you can't get.

Frank Cho and the like cater to the mainstream. A lot of straight guys read comics, and many of them like looking at pictures of sexy ladies. It's a large market.

Conversely, if male sexualization happens in comics, it usually caters to the straight female mainstream. So, you can get your share of sexualized men – sexualized in the way female readers might like.

Your example, however, doesn't fit into the mainstream. So you'd have to wait until a comic creator who likes the exact same thing makes a comic to suit their own tastes.

>>92230984
Not what I asked for.

>>92231110
Translation: "Me and the other ones here suck ass at looking for it, therefor it doesn't exist."

File: pillar men.png (419KB, 1404x1099px) Image search: [Google]

419KB, 1404x1099px

JoJo's Bizarre Adventure

>Male gay inclusion.
Sorbet and Geleto are gay

Dio and Scarlet Valentine are bisexual

>Showing off any of the males' butt in a sexy outfit revealing skin on their legs and buttcheeks (similarly to how they usually do with female characters in comics). And it doesn't count if it's depicted for the sake of comedy - it has to be intentionally sexy.
This happens regularly. Male sexuality / male sex appeal is constantly flaunted in JoJo.

>>92231148
Reiterate what you are looking for OP. Here's what I've gathered so far:

> Twinks, not beefcake
> Mankinis and ass-windows, bulging dicks
> Flaming gay characters
> Action and mystery, sci fi, whatever: real comic book stories told with twinks that bend over now and then
> Importantly it's not all about them being gay

These books don't exist, OP. They would not be a commercial success. Nobody wants to make them. Go and commission some gay art or just google it.

>>92231096
It's complicated because you want a mainstream comic that would apply a female sexualization aesthetic to a gay male character. There's no reason anyone would ever do something like that.

>>92231261
Why would it exist? >>92231319 and >>92231324 are right, there's literally no market for something as specific as that

>>92231148
How do you know when I didn't even give you the name of the book?

>>92231318
>th-that's done for c-comedy! h-ha ha ha... ha...

>>92231364
None of the things you describe fit into it, other than there being male gay inclusion.

>>92231318
They are mangas. In black and white. Also, it's from Japan, so the supposed "gay inclusion" is nothing but subtext.

>>92231319
>tfw that last one is impossible
i just want to read a fucking story that has gay dudes fucking not some shitty overcoming adversity bullshit. Why is that so hard?

>>92231651
I literally said I'm not looking for porn, shmuck.

>>92231517
Just because that's all I remember doesn't mean that's all there is.

File: 1383594454880.png (366KB, 749x1155px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 749x1155px

>>92231598
There are many official published color volumes of JoJo, it's not just covers

>Also, it's from Japan, so the supposed "gay inclusion" is nothing but subtext.
Japan has buckets of comics about gay and trans people, the community there is massive you racist cunt.

The reason why gay relationships aren't explored more blatantly in JoJo is because it's not hugely relevant to the plot. The creator himself has confirmed characters being gay and bisexual. Male gay inclusion is 100% there even if you pretend otherwise.

>>92231750
I want you to actually describe the comic you want. The ideal gay male gaze comic. Tell me what it looks like. Tell me what it is about. Tell me the level of writing or art talent you'd want. Don't just give people impossible or nebulous search criteria and call them idiots/schmucks/retards. Until you sit down and think this through it's pointless talking to you.

File: 1471742787937.png (345KB, 500x560px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 500x560px

Hey guys, what about that one furry comic about that buff, beefcake-y dog (bear?) in overalls that's always trying to help everyone out? I forgot the name of it, but I've seen it here lots of times. He's friendly and happy all the time. He has a pretty plump booty and one overall strap is always undone. Does anyone know the webcomic I'm talking about?

>>92231867
But the creators must confirm it, see? Only female gay stuff is really done in a respectable manner - male gay stuff is just subtext... unless it's yaoi, but that's just exploitation crap.

Japan thinks homosexuality doesn't even exist. They view it as a mere fetish over there, hence why it's never been illegal. I'm not a racist for stating facts.

File: SectionEight3a.jpg (229KB, 620x971px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 620x971px

Bueno Excellent probably the closest thing to what you asked for.

>>92231996
Why is it that SJWs are actually the most hateful, bigoted and racist people

>>92231996
Respectability, like sexualization, is in the eye of the beholder, which is great for you because it means that you can just go "nope doesn't count" indefinitely, which we can all tell is what you really want.

>>92231867
OP wants a pride march but mixed with a 90's cheesecake comic but with dudes but no actual sex but lots of teen boy-ass and thick teen dicks glinting under spandex. OP wants to sit with a stack of these comics and luxuriate in a comfy alt-90's world that never existed.

Anything else is oppression

File: Shemale-chainmail.jpg (148KB, 664x1024px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 664x1024px

>>92229764
True, but Fanny revels in being both male and female.

>>92232024
Same reason why Umbridge is more hated than Voldemort.

>>92231928
... webcomic? WEBCOMIC?? I said I want a comic I can physically purchase, dude.

>>92232016
Fuck off.

>>92232061
Yes but we don't care what you want drama queen.
It's clear that you'll just cry oppression no matter what, so other people are gonna hijack your thread now, kay?

>>92226316
>mainstream comic
>with a gay male character
>said gay male character given uber-campy outfit and constantly sexualized
You know why this never gonna happen OP?

Because if it did, every single LGBT activist would shout "HOMOPHOBIA"

>>92232061
We're going to make this comic for you dude. I have the whole team sitting right here. Just tell us what you want to see in clear terms. We'll send it to your LCS and you can pay for it over the counter and everything. Just explain yourself clearly.

>>92226406
>Being nude isn't in itself sexualization - being nude is just being nude.
But if it's done to a woman, it's always sexualization no exceptions.

>>92232154
I've already explained.

File: 1475093157668.webm (1MB, 720x404px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 720x404px

>>92231996
>But the creators must confirm it, see?
The picture that anon posted is a comic about trans people.
The two characters are the same character.
Kind of hard for that to be subtext when it's the whole plot.
Fuck it I can't find my picture of Jellyfish Princess just take this instead.

>>92232160
Oh fuck off you obvious troll. Your original trolling approach was clever, don't lower yourself to stating the obviously untrue like a 11-year-old who has opened page 1 of How To Troll

>>92232201
Explain again in simple terms or go suck a vagina

File: suicide.png (352KB, 639x321px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 639x321px

This thread is hilarious. I'm surprised people are still trying to genuinely help.

File: wuffle.jpg (237KB, 1000x1148px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1000x1148px

>>92231928
Wuffle

>>92232061
YOUR ANSWER DOES NOT AMUSE THE LANDWALE. HOW DARE YOU ASK QUESTIONS IN THIS THREAD. THIS IS THE LAND RULED BY THE LANDWHALE, NOBODY ELSE GETS TO HAVE FUN YOU ALL MUST PAY ATTENTION TO THE LANDWHALE

>>92229246
Subtle

>>92226344
I tried, still gay

File: shiggy.jpg (250KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 1280x853px

>>92226316
What's the purpose of finding something that meets your exact specifications? other than your actual intention of creating a giant thread full of angry shitposters shitposting each other

All of the comics that are really close to your description should at least be worthy of discussion, but you just shoot 'em down.

>>92229165
lol a good point is brought up and OP suddenly dissapears

>>92232625
OP has been starved of attention since ageing out of the rape pit/foster home and now he's casually trolling in one tab while searching for childcare jobs in another. He has no intention of actually taking any advice.

>>92232625
in a few days an article will be published which explains how the comic industry is sexist and /co/ is full of homophobic mysoginists

I wish every female superheroine was drawn with bootyshorts and thigh highs ;_;

I would read comics with a perpetual boner

>>92232211
So which one controls the tail? How do they get anywhere? Just in the webm the one head is fine where he is and the other one wants to move further. What happens when they want to go in completely opposite directions?

>>92232758
> I looked at the T&A on show in a selection of comics from the mid 1990s and I had to ask...just where are all the beautiful boys? Where are my delicious freckled arses and firm young thighs? Is society still so unequal in 2017 that mid-90's comic creators are not retroactively catering for my specific perversion? I went to the popular message board /co/ to find out...and you won't believe the reception they gave me."

>>92232616
Try harder.

File: 1469039357984.jpg (75KB, 570x576px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 570x576px

>>92232982
>tfw you hear it in lacy green's voice

>>92226316
NO there never will be. Now stop asking and look up your own softcore porn like everyone else

>>92232091
Wha- this is EXACTLY what you are asking for! Bulging dick! Not overly muscular! Bends over! Mankini! Queer as a three dollar bill! Not porn! He fills EVERY goddamn single one of your requirements! Bueno Excelente is EVERYTHING you want. Everything you need. He is everything inside of you that you wish you could be. He says "Bueno, Excellente" at exactly the right time, but you're here like "fuck off" and I don't know why.

>>92234723
You could literally have your lips around the base of OP's dick with a picture of Nightwing taped to the top of your head and he'd tell you to fuck off.

>* Male gay inclusion.
This is the one that confuses me the most. Most sexualization of women in comics is still pretty straight. Why do you suddenly want gay dudes? You ask for not porn but really it sounds like you want porn.

>>92229809
You are a liar.