New Oglaf. Btw there are some surprises if you remove the background

>>91976787
> we totally don't need the clicks guys and I'm not one of the people behind the strip

OK OK I'LL GO LOOK BUT JUST BECAUSE YOU'RE FUNNY

>>91976787
>Btw there are some surprises if you remove the background of the site, or if you block all images.

Such as?

>>91976831
Another funny sentence
A Chick tract about our god Sithrak

>>91976787
I turned off the background
all I saw was white

>>91976787
>Btw there are some surprises if you remove the background of the site, or if you block all images.
And how do you do those things?

>>91976912
if you firefox or chrome you can inspect element and then untick the background css, or just remove the img url

File: google.jpg (9KB, 357x153px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 357x153px

>>91976912

>>91976906
Same. I see nothing at all.

>>91977742
>>91976906
>>91976912
Try Opera 12.x.

>>91977817
No.

File: wherefore.jpg (74KB, 772x627px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 772x627px

>>91977836
Your loss.

>>91977836
ok, stick with your shit Firefox and Chrome. Or are you using Netscape Navigator?

http://static.oglaf.com/img/tracts/bears/bbday_01.jpg
it goes all the way up to _17.
It's and advert.

>>91977866
>your loss

i dont see it.

>>91979665
Are you using old Opera?

>>91979780
not that, i don't see the "loss"
i am very dissapointed

>>91979899
Maybe Oglaf is not for you.

>>91976787
Aren't these two like 13?

>>91980533
No according to the alt text.

>>91980533
>13
A perfectly good age to marry in those times.

>>91980626
But nutrition back then would mean they'd be way smaller and less developed

>>91980533
Juliet was 13, Romeo was 16

>>91980654
They were from rich families.