[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

When will we get a more recent Star Trek Cartoon? Star Wars

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 33
Thread images: 13

When will we get a more recent Star Trek Cartoon?

Star Wars seems to get new series every decade, what the hell?
>>
File: donal01b.jpg?pictureId=2268818.jpg (183KB, 642x744px) Image search: [Google]
donal01b.jpg?pictureId=2268818.jpg
183KB, 642x744px
>>91806920
There was almost a cartoon set long after the DS9/VOY era, but it never came to be.
>>
File: hqdefault (2).jpg (13KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]
hqdefault (2).jpg
13KB, 480x360px
>>91806920
I don't get it either, especially since the new Star Trek movies are just Star Wars in Trek's universe.

I want my space catgirls back damnit!
>>
Trek's not nearly as popular and never has been.
>>
>>91807104
fuck off, those new Star Trek movies are nothing like Star Wars. They're just generic action blockbusters pretending to be set in the Star Trek universe.
>>
>>91806920
Star Wars is owned by Disney. They have animation connections.

Star Trek is owned by CBS/Paramount. They don't.
>>
File: kirk.jpg (48KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]
kirk.jpg
48KB, 500x281px
>>91807114
>not nearly as popular
>fans had a space shuttle named after the Enterprise
>>
>>91807288
Star Trek only appealed to nerds back then, and didn't reach the normie audience Star Wars had by the balls since its released until the late 2000s.
>>
Green Lantern TAS filled that spot.
>>
>>91806920
Star Trek lacks any decent creators with good ideas. It was popular because it was fun to see a good cast thrown into a different fantastic situation every week. No one likes Trek enough these days to do anything except generic explosions, which entirely misses the point.
>>
>>91807117
>They're just generic action blockbusters
so Star Wars?
>>
I'd rather have no new trek content than more set in the NuTrek canon. Fuck that shit, they somehow managed to ruin the relationship dynamics of a cast where they only need two or three characteristics each to not suck balls.
>>
File: hardtime_232.jpg (80KB, 705x530px) Image search: [Google]
hardtime_232.jpg
80KB, 705x530px
>tfw the new series is on the horizon and is so far looking to be a piece of shit
>>
>>91807117
>>91807690
Beyond was actually pretty good. Still had a shallow "REVENGE ON THE FEDERATION" villain, though.
>>
>>91807690
lets hope that Star Trek Discovery is good. The cast looks pretty god tier, but the stepping away of Brian Fuller and them putting it on their shitty streaming service has me worried
>>
>>91808113
Are they still planning on doing that dumbass thing where they're only going to follow a single bridge officer and completely ignore crew dynamics like its predecessors (i.e. what made Star Trek fucking work as a show)?
>>
>>91808440
sounds like that would be a waste of the cast. You don't go out and get movie calibre actors if you are going to ignore them.
>>
>>91807072
There have been about 4-5 different cartoon pitches, all rejected. For some reason every time they present art for one, they go to this ridiculous X-treme style with incredibly angular bodies and superhero uniforms. Looks like shit.
>>
File: m'ress-yescaptain.jpg (964KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]
m'ress-yescaptain.jpg
964KB, 1200x1200px
>>91808047
Doubt it will be any good. Supposedly intense studio interference from the head of CBS, who is an old fat retard who hates sci-fi, is resulting in a lot of fucked up shit. "JJ shit is hot right now. Make it look like that!" is the cause of a lot of issues.

The other half of the shit sandwich is an infestation of SJWs that think Star Trek was a vessel for politics instead of simply presenting a future where prejudices don't exist.
>>
>>91806920
I'd be totally up for a classic animated except everything this anon said is true: >>91808750
>>
>>91808750
>The other half of the shit sandwich is an infestation of SJWs that think Star Trek was a vessel for politics
Oh fuck off. Star Trek was always full of social commentary. If Star Trek had been created in the modern day, people would be calling it SJW propaganda.
>>
File: YIFF_IN_HELL.jpg (44KB, 254x247px) Image search: [Google]
YIFF_IN_HELL.jpg
44KB, 254x247px
>>91807104

you just want more m'ress porn.
>>
File: 4176305376_91d81b1e67_o.jpg (221KB, 627x815px) Image search: [Google]
4176305376_91d81b1e67_o.jpg
221KB, 627x815px
>>91809407
That's just an added bonus.
>>
File: nene with a gun.jpg (60KB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]
nene with a gun.jpg
60KB, 600x338px
>Need an alien species
>Just add a furry

Creativity at it's best.
>>
File: Deadpool Kitty.jpg (160KB, 640x857px) Image search: [Google]
Deadpool Kitty.jpg
160KB, 640x857px
>>91809867
As a hairy man I've got to say I have enough hell from gagging on my own body hair at night. I don't see why anyone would find a woman with more chest hair than me appealing.
>>
>>91808750
Science fiction was an easy avenue to indirectly address politics and social issues and Gene Roddenberry had no problem doing just that. You're an ignorant idiot.
>>
>>91808750
>Star Trek
>a future where prejudices don't exist
Did you even watch the fucking show? Any of them?
>>
I hope we get one done in the art style of Voltron with more dry humor and less goofy.
>>
File: Anbo-jyutsu.jpg (93KB, 1232x911px) Image search: [Google]
Anbo-jyutsu.jpg
93KB, 1232x911px
There will never be another Star Trek cartoon because cartoons are for children and Star Trek is for adults.
>>
>>91809917
is that cat racist against cats with the left side of their face black?
>>
>>91807104
We get it. This show only has a fan base because of horny furries lusting after a cat girl in a mini skirt.
>>
File: 2008-05-24-Mress.jpg (31KB, 292x341px) Image search: [Google]
2008-05-24-Mress.jpg
31KB, 292x341px
>>91809407
Actually I'd like a shot where she looks sentient and not like a cat in a dress
>>
>>91811576
No, just the ones who are black on the WRONG side.
Thread posts: 33
Thread images: 13


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.