Turns out it wasn't an April fools joke. I feel bad for

>>91218201
By letting that paedo hang.

I hope he gets shot by a cop.

>>91218201
>he's a fantastic artist

I'm sorry you have such shit taste.

>>91218219
>By letting that paedo hang.
But he's in trouble for Roblox fanart

>>91218201
Fuck him

He's a degenerate cunt with no skill who gets by entirely on shock value pandering to outcasts like you

>>91218260
This is the best fucking part.

>>91218201
Who is this guy and what does he do? and why does /co/ hate him so much?

File: [confused HUUUH].gif (100KB, 805x540px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 805x540px

>>91218201
>he's a fantastic artist
>i feel bad for him
>maybe my favorite
it's not april fools anymore but this thread is a fucking joke

File: PLqgqvw.jpg (796KB, 608x1070px) Image search: [Google]

796KB, 608x1070px

>>91218201
There are better artists. also kys.

File: 1419398143508.jpg (194KB, 760x640px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 760x640px

>>91218201

By laughing at him.

>>91218260
News flash it isn't the Roblox, that was a joke. This is off his Patreon:
>I guess it had to happen sooner or later that shadbase gets into legal trouble.

>Glad it took this long.

>(The roblox things is obviously a meme)

>After 5 years of running the site, this is the first time, my dedicated server has been confiscated by the hosting company, becaus certain content got reported.

>Im trying to negotiate something with them to get my files back, so I can save shadbase. My plan is to let them go through everything and make them see for themselves that stuff may be questionable but not illegal.

>I want to bring the website back, fully uncensored - If I have to start censoring shadbase, I think its best to quit the site and figure something else out.

>Im fighting this and trying to figure out legal ways to keep shadbase up, however I dont know how long it will take and IF the site will be able to go live again.

>In any case thanks for bearing with me. I will be having new content once this is solved. And if I cant solve it, I will keep drawing, but I will figure out how to run thins differently.

>>91218390
>Bawwww I got in trouble for my pedo art
>Won't someone think of the poor pedophiles?!?

>>91218349
He draws flash porn of animated characters and so far has skated by on parody.

I don't think /co/ hates him but they're not going to have any sympathy either, aside from the ones who get off on his shit and are sad they have to use their imagination when jerking off.

>>91218201
It's over juggalo Lego fan art

File: S1E16_Toffee_narrowing_his_eyes.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>91218390
top kek.

File: 2011-08-28-necrolationship.jpg (469KB, 938x1501px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 938x1501px

>>91218201
His humour comics were great and I wish I had them archived.

Should've kept his porn separate on shagbase.

>>91218489
See
>>91218390
It's not. It's clearly the pedo art.

>>91218349
>Who is this guy
internet artist shadman
>and what does he do?
he draws lewds and sometimes other things
>why does /co/ hate him so much?
pick from the following list,make your own combo:
-adding unnecesary tatoos andpiercing to his drawings that turn off a lot of people
-adding facial expressions that ruin it for some people
-being edgy, drawing controversial stuff just to get exposure
-drawing porn based on real life children
-drawing porn based on real life adulst he turns into children
-his shading/lighting style giveshis stuffa weird look
-frustration that, when he gets his head out of his ass, he can actually deliver good stuff (happens rarely)

>>91218260
why would be put the site offline for a single picture DMCA?

>>91218569
see >>91218390
anon's got the meme version of the story

>>91218537
He's screwed then.

>>91218555
His anatomy is also awful
And one time he made a porn picture of his mom

>>91218390
poor pedo :(

>>91218555
Proof that he drew porn of real kids?

>>91218436
Nothing illegal there.

>>91218436
I know, right?

Now with this victory in hand, I hope they finally start banning violent video games.

File: 78945464213135446484564686455645456465652313135.png (39KB, 182x201px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 182x201px

>/co/, of all places, making fun of pedophiles
dipper's cheeks

>>91218605
He was drawing YouTubers and YouTubers children who were underage in very sexual poses and drinking cum.

>>91218349
>why does /co/
it's nto /co/, it's the whole tumblr clicke that uses /co/ as a second base that want him literally (and I mean literally) dead for drawing things they don't like (which match the state of mind of their 2017 muslim new bbf to defend).

>>91218629
I asked for proof.

>>91218617
copyright, look up fanart copyright, after youtube got smashed the hosting companies are getting scared

File: 1315002253593.jpg (114KB, 753x678px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 753x678px

>>91218629

>>91218605
"of real kids" doesn't mean tracing pedo art, it just means using real names and vague look on his porn. He's not good enough invoke any attempt at real cp to begin with.

>>91218645
No, it's /pol/ cunts who are triggered by "degeneracy".

>>91218605
Overwatch loli's are on paheal.

>>91218627
I was into Dipper's cheeks but I wasn't making any money out of them

>>91218629
That's pretty fucked. Liking loli porn is one thing but based off real kids? That's sick.

>>91218661
Oooooh I see.

>>91218661
Google: Shadman LtCorbis.

>>91218666
>that wild goal post moving
seriously, you went from "he deserves it because he's a PEDO" to "b.b.but copyrights".
It doesn't even apply there at all. copyrights don't defend art you make from scratch. in drawn art it's nearly impossible to invoke unless you use the trademarked brand to sell said pictures on the intent of fooling the consumers about your products being the real things.
nothing applies to his site. Hate and beliefs don't send people to jail.

>>91218666
But apparently copyright had nothing to do with it.

>>91218673
So you won't give me any proof then.

>>91218201
>helping pedos

>>91218661
Not them but I saw it on his site. I'll look through the Wayback machine

>>91218201

>he's a fantastic artist

I haven't checked Shad in years but I remember his art being wonky as hell, like >>91218525

File: pancakes.jpg (238KB, 816x1356px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 816x1356px

>>91218678
totally wrong. The fact you raised the "muh ppol" card just proves me 100% right, you lost any other possible counter now.

>>91218201
Thank god. I'm tired of his shit ruining r34

>>91218684
Wow, I didn't realize overwatch characters were both real and children. Did Blizzard get permission from their parents to make a game out of them?

Stjepan Sejic, you're next!

Can they go after Sparrow next? He's not as flagrantly offensive as Shad but I still hate his shit.

>>91218684
>overwatch
>real
the hate is a powerful blinding tool I see.

>>91218701
>Shadman LtCorbis
That's really fucked up. Like, what the fuck. I always knew he was an edgy fucktard but that's some massive line crossing right there.

>>91218745
totally wrong. The fact you raised the "muh t-tumblr" card just proves me 100% right, you lost any other possible counter now.

File: Otaku translator.jpg (335KB, 685x1137px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 685x1137px

>>91218741
I didn't read it for the art.

File: chris hansen.jpg (61KB, 576x720px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 576x720px

>>91218629
Well, well, what do we have here?

>>91218772
Why?

>>91218701
Well shit.

>>91218760
>>91218719
>>91218661
He was doing art of some youtubers kid. I found it on the Wayback machine by going to November 6th on his site.

File: shadman.jpg (11KB, 181x272px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 181x272px

>>91218201

>>91218701
Jesus Christ. He really did it, I thought you were joking.

>>91218773
Misread and didn't notice we were talking real kids.
Still, point still stands he drew loli porn.

>>91218701
>Google
>not good VPN + good proxy + Ixquick or Searx
Nice try, FBI.

>>91218201
>he's a fantastic artist
Wat. I mean, SOME of his stuff is pretty good(and even then, I'd say much if not most of it is just mediocre, not even something I'd call good), but I don't think I've seen a single picture of his that I'd call "fantastic".

>>91218790
And you forget about he draw Laura from the Logan movie, and Keemstar´s daughter. He´s really fucked up in the head.

He won´t be missed.

>>91218890
>drew loli porn

Oh no! Call the trigger police! That's literally rape!

>>91218701
I know its super wrong
But I fucking hate youtubers so I just feel numb to it

>>91218890
What's wrong with loli porn?

File: 1350522202293.png (535KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

535KB, 1280x1024px

Whether you enjoy his art or not, no one should be happy about this. Sets a bad standard for freedom of expression.

>>91218919
I'll give him credit where credit is due, I just looked at his new stuff for research, and its gotten a lot better
I mean, still not great, but it doesn't hurt my eyes

>>91218936
I'm pretty sure it could actually be sexual harassment of a minor, since its an actual child he's drawing porn of and posting it online

>>91219008
youre right im not happy, im angry this outspoken pedophile hasnt been lynched yet

>>91218227
Is he black?

>>91219027
It's only illegal if you trace over an actual photo of a child.
Well at least in the US
>>91219038
>Lynching someone for drawings
How edgy.

>>91219038
I thought you sharia people preferred stonings.

>>91219010
Yeah, he's not bad(when he's not drawing loli or futas), but I just don't see how anyone could call him fantastic.

>>91219072
Pedophilia is celebrated in Islam. He's probably just a normie

>>91219027
>could actually be sexual harassment

No it couldn't. If he kept spamming to her personal mailbox, then sure, that would be actual harassment. But that's not what he's done.

>>91219053
No, it's illegal if you trace over actual child pornography.

Because that, by definition, means you possess actual child pornography.

File: spidey.jpg (18KB, 376x285px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 376x285px

>/co/ attacks John Byrne for being a pedo
>/co/ defends some webcomic loser for being a pedo

>>91219130
I feel like you're trying to disagree with me but you just repeated what I said.

>>91218201
HAHA

>>91219090
Porn is completely illegal in Islamic countries.

>>91219144
>/co/ is one person

I'll defend anyone's right to draw loli. At long as something doesn't hurt someone, people should be free to pursue it.

>>91219130
>>91219097
>>91219053
I think none of you aren't a lawyers and have no background in sexual harassment and pornography laws.

>>91219144
did you not read the thread? its pretty divided

>>91219053
Doesn't shadman live outside the US

>>91219220
Pretty sure he's Russian but I'm not sure.

I don´t hate him for being a lolicon, I hate him because his awful drawings.

File: 1460715069814.png (377KB, 574x636px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 574x636px

>>91218201
Can someone explain what even happened this time?

>>91219151
You said tracing an actual photo of a child. If it's a pornographic photo yes, it's illegal.

If it's a kid in a swimsuit, then no, it's not illegal.

>>91219207
I know enough of the law to know that draw porn is protected speech.

>>91219220

He's Swiss and lives in the U.S., you mongs.

>>91218673
It wasn't porn though.

File: 43d.jpg (108KB, 728x546px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 728x546px

I would normally feel bad out of principle. Loli is not pedo in my opinion. It's creepy as fuck sure, but not pedo. It's not pedo cuz it's not real people, its magical girls or even just cartoon characters. But that nigga Shad went and drew actual underage girls based on actually real underage girls. He drew that Lt Corbis girl from YouTube getting fucked, that's a real underage girl you creepy fuck. You gotta draw a line SOMEWHERE.

File: IMG_0190.png (331KB, 396x468px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 396x468px

>fantastic artist

>>91219247
See >>91218701

>>91219178
/co/ is a hivemind, yes.
>>91219208
Did you not read the thread we had two days ago? Full /pol/.

>>91218555
Wait, he uses real kids? Fuck, if one of my guys did that, I'd fire 'em on the spot and ask another one to redo the art with less child sex abuse. Pedos who get off to real kids are literally the worst.

File: 08.jpg (17KB, 690x285px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 690x285px

>>91219247
Basically people were reporting some of the images on his site and his server was confiscated by the hosting company.
He's trying to sort it out with them.

File: swiss playing alphorn.jpg (54KB, 720x483px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 720x483px

Good! That Swiss bastard deserves everything he gets.

>>91219249
>I know enough of the law to know that draw porn is protected speech.
Really you have such a detailed understanding of law to tell us that drawing porn of an actual person while making money from ad revenue with no consent to use their likeness is 100% legal, let alone using a minor as a model?

File: 2D.png (306KB, 977x1400px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 977x1400px

>>91219257
I draw the line at when people start getting hurt.

>>91219257
This.
Enjoy your loli porn all you want, there're dozens of artist who do it better, don't act like edgy faggots, and don't base their drawings on actual children.

>>91219144
Weeaboo logic in action.

File: America.jpg (18KB, 222x166px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 222x166px

>>91218605
Does a loli Hillary clinton getting fucked by Trump count?

>>91219312
Actually a lot of the biggest names when it comes to loli artist in Japan do it as well.

Why do you guys hate Shadman? Can't handle his edgyness?

>>91219309
>moving the goal posts again

Funny how it keeps coming back to copyright issues.

But no, mocking cartoons are exempt from such issues. If it weren't, every political cartoonist would be sued out of existence.

File: Cultureman.jpg (49KB, 960x644px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 960x644px

>>91219312
>>91219310
>>91219257

>>91219382
He's the Family Guy of smud artists

>>91219382
I just hate his drawings, there's always something that's off putting about them, whether it be the anatomy or the face. The edginess doesn't help, nor does the subject matter

>>91219396
I thought Solomon Russell was the Family Guy of smud artists?
What about Doug Winger?

File: 1489849837812.jpg (45KB, 728x635px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 728x635px

Didn't Shadman draw porn of his mother for her birthday?

>>91219444
Then stop looking at them, retard.

File: 1489902027166.jpg (271KB, 673x607px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 673x607px

>>91218605
You just want me to post pseudo CP dont you! I know your schemes!

>>91219451
Keep listing pedo webcomic creators, please.

>>91219484
I bet you don't even know who Solomon Russell is.

File: Tom King has seen some shit.png (133KB, 492x294px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 492x294px

>>91219467
>draw porn of his mother for her birthday
D-did he?

>>91219484
>>91219501

Or Doug Winger.

Jesus what's with all the newfags?

>>91219451
More like the Cleveland Show of smud artists

>>91219521
Maybe they like real creators?

>>91219470
I don't look at them whenever he puts them out, I'm basing it off of what drawings I've seen

>>91219484
And since when did Shadman make a webcomic?

>>91219536
doubtful

>>91219467
There's zero proof that was actually his mom

Though an anon at /a/ did something similar and he sounded pretty convincing

>>91219389
>moving goal posts
My first post in this thread was saying it's sexual harassment of a minor.
Also the laws protecting things like political cartoonist explicitly state that 1. the people they are public figures, which the child of a youtuber isn't and 2. That the work isn't obscene

>>91219289
desu the irl lolis he drew barely look like their counterparts.

Still going to fap to it either way.

>>91218761
What did he do? He never drew loli.

>>91219561
Someone posted one in this thread.

>>91219289
>CP trafficker
ArcRoyale, huh? Let´s ask our FBI guys about you.

>>91219591
>Slav scum
>not a pedo

how on earth is paheal still alive

>>91218201
since when did /co/ start tolerating shadman of all people?

I suspect this is something /pol/ induced.

>>91219658
Because contrary to the underagebanneds on this thread, porn is protected speech.

>>91219484
Aaron Diaz, for one.

>>91219693
I thought he just had a creepy obsession with Ashley Burch?

>>91219513
>porn
It was a nude with some heavy metal lyrics to go with it.

>>91219615
Joke's on you. My stuff's all censored.

I mean... maybe you could get dirt on Xierra099 since she draws hentai on the side, but I've never commissioned THAT from her and she does just as much SFW art.

>>91219681
Pornography is explicitly not free speech

>>91219521
Isn't Doug Winger that ancient futa furry artist? I thought he stopped producing content years ago, dude has to be near retirement age.

>>91219756
I think he died

>>91219755
Mmm, nope.

>>91219755
It is in the US, which is why loli is legal here.

File: 1463261489866.jpg (2MB, 1078x1534px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1078x1534px

Give a single reason why lolicon should be illegal outside "cause I don't like it"

your FAVORITE ARTIST is shadman

>>91219671
He's an edgy faggot but he's all the fast food of smut. Him and dudes like Shiin aren't exactly the highest quality but they almost always have some new content to jack it to.

>>91219782
>>91219775
It is not in the US. Legally free speech doesn't cover obscene art.

>>91219826
Yet loli is legal here.

>>91219681
Not really. It is regulated by the federal government and certain kinds of porn are in fact outlawed completely.

>>91219756
He died, Anon. I think due to complications with diabetes.

>>91219826
I wonder how you function, being this stupid.

>>91219847
is it legal or do they choose not to spend manpower on going after thousands of loli artist who arent really bothering anyone?

Have you seen the comments from Shad's fans on the Corbis images? That's the creepiest part.

>OH I BET CORBIS WOULD LOVE THIS IMAGE

>GOOD JOB SHAD I KNOW SHE WOULDNT MIND THIS

etc etc

>>91219891
It's legal. I know because my best friend is a cop who is into it.
If you're found with real CP they'll use it against it, but it alone is harmless

>>91219891
There is no records of artists going to jail for drawing underage art.

FBI has better things to do instead of going after a virgins that looks at degenerate cartoon porn.

Good, fuck him and his shitty art.

File: Artist collection.jpg (115KB, 1707x535px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 1707x535px

>>91219815
One of my favourites yes

>>91219891
It's legal. They don't bother going after them because they'd be laughed out of court.

If it were illegal they'd go after them just to pad their resumes.

>>91219847
I mean it's not, because it's obscene.
>>91219888
The Supreme Court has upheld that obscenity is not covered by the first amendment numerous times.
Seriously, we're on /co/ and you fuckers know nothing of obscenity laws. Look up Mike Diana or even just the CBLDF.

>>91219903
More like stupidly hilarious.

>>91219451

Doug Winger was a fine man. Do not slur him. RIP.

>>91220010
The Supreme Court has held up that drawn cartoons are free speech.

Hustler Magazine v. Falwell

>>91219536
Winger was part of the team of engineers that created the fucking A-10 Thunderbolt, he was more of a creator than most porn artists by any definition

>>91220010
>Mike Diana

Are you the same retard from last thread that brought him up? He's an exception that doens't prove the rule. He got shafted by the shittiest sort of judicial abuse in the most backwards podunk part of Florida. It means nothing.

>>91218624

This.

Law, by its nature, works off of precedence. He's asking to open the door to thought crimes. What happens when someone decides that they don't like HIS thoughts, and the judge agrees? That's the noose that you tie when you prosecute somebody merely for expressing things that you don't like.

Crimes related to expression need to be strictly limited to slander and incitement.

>>91219903

If those are actually the most extreme examples you can find, then it sounds like completely normal internet shit talking.

>half the thread is defending this pedophile

Okay.

File: 1490683277262.webm (965KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

965KB, 720x540px

>>91219257
>I would normally feel bad out of principle. Loli is not pedo in my opinion. It's creepy as fuck sure, but not pedo
Exactly. I love to piss around a lot, but I honestly don't have any beef with lolicon artists in general. They're art is just not my thing is all. I've talked with a lot of them over the years and the majority of them are really nice and wouldn't harm a fly. I felt bad when that artist got his bank account((or maybe i'm thinking of his Paypal(?)) shutdown after some anti-lolicon guy tricked him with a commission, published his private information everywhere, then immediately reported him on everything with the image he purchased. It wasn't even based around a real person. I don't see how any sane individual can feel bad for Shadman though.

I love it when edgelords are made an example of. These degenerates deserve every bad thing that happens to themselves, especially the fans.

>>91220046
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell and Mike Diana where two completely different cases

>>91220091
>Crimes related to expression need to be strictly limited to slander and incitement.
And drawing porn of a real child is somehow not comparable to slander?

>>91220050

Doug Winger is basically a guy who had a fetish. Saw that no one else was doing. And so went and did it himself. He's is a shining example of DIY.

>>91219810
Because it's sexual depiction of children.
Fictional children but still children.

>>91220046
As long as they aren't obscene. The court stated that the Hustler Cartoon was "so outrageous" that it couldn't be considered anything but parody.
>>91220076
Nope I'm not sure who you are talking about,but there are numerous other cases just like Diana's

>>91220091
>Law, by its nature, works off of precedence.
Only because you inherited the shitty common law system from UK.

>>91220190
So?

>>91220190

And the supposed justification for CP being illegal is that it cannot be made without harm coming to real children. Not because the idea itself should be illegal a priori.

>>91220157

Did he force an actual kid to model naked, thereby bringing the offense to something beyond expression? If I draw a naked person and say "this is this kid", should I have my life ruined?

>comparable to slander

Nope, this is a completely different issue altogether. Slander is when you deliberately tell lies about someone in an effort to ruin their reputation.

>>91220157
>not comparable to slander

No. You're really grasping at straws here.

>The court stated that the Hustler Cartoon was "so outrageous" that it couldn't be considered anything but parody.

Exactly.

A cartoonist drew Jerry Falwell fucking his own mother in an outhouse, and the Supreme Court said that was free, protected speech.

>>91220190
>cause I don't like it

>>91220190
What about violence on fictional people? I mean fictional people are still people.

>>91220229
This is the real creepy thing I get out of these threads (besides people wiping their asses with the 1st amendment.)

People don't understand why CP is bad in the first place.

File: american-psycho-bateman.jpg (62KB, 600x327px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 600x327px

>>91220106
>mfw Shad comes back and draw more lolis, futas, piercings, and anus

Stay mad, plebs

>>91220278

A very large portion portion of people believe things that make them uncomfortable should be illegal.

>>91220046
The SCOTUS deemed that particular case in Hustler vs Falwell an express of political art, not pornography. Parody is covered by free speech, especially parody of public figures.

Hustler Magazine won the case to avoid a slander charge not to protect production of pornography. lol

>>91220278
That's what I tend to run into when I get into these debates.
People are stupid, they simply do not think for themselves, mommy and daddy told this (x) is wrong, so it's wrong, they don't try figure out why it's wrong, so when it comes to having a discussion of legality and morality they're fucking messes.

>>91220252
You are conveniently forgetting the second part of that ruling in that it only applies to public figures, something that a child of a youtuber isn't.

>>91220339
And that's the same precedent by which all that porn on paheal stays up.

File: 7941473298.png (166KB, 448x473px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 448x473px

>Shadman is a fantastic artist

yyyyyyyeah, I'm gonna have to ask you to leave.

>>91220361

You sound like a pretty big pedophile anon. I'm sorry you're frustrated to the point of thinking people telling you you're creepy counts as debating.

>>91220190
>t. virgin fapping to women being sexually abused

What happened? Anyone got the story.

>>91220367
>only applies to public figures

Like youtubers?

>>91220394
Not an argument.

>>91220407
Yeah, but not their children.

>>91220361
degenerate

>>91218390

Thats it? I expected a copyright lawsuit or some shit. This is normal for most drawn porn sites out there, eventually they all settled down to russian/eastern european service providers who don't really give a shit about whatever content you produce.

>>91220429
Or Jerry Falwell's mother?

>I don't like it so it should be illegal even though it doesn't harm anyone
Thanks tumblr and/or /pol/! Great argument.

>>91219467
>>91219513
He sure did.
>>91219571
Wew laddie, better check that artist's description.
http://www.newgrounds.com/art/view/theshadling/mother

>Shadman will never draw Moon Girl
;__;

>>91218390
But loli and shota should not be illegal, this is fucking stupid. So I know there's a completely different reason for what's happening.

>>91220453
Well unless they used her likeness. I mean Shad posted pics of the girl he used as the model in the comments.

Whether you hate him or love him you have to admit besides the edgy shock value, his art is pretty mediocre.

File: 1490889173285.jpg (77KB, 750x729px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 750x729px

I liked his incredibles stuff

>>91220521
It certainly doesn't deserve the popularity it has.

>>91220451
Apparently it was for the content though, not a copyright issue.

For all the talk of law here everybody's missing the big picture.

Falsely reporting somebody for CP is illegal. If anybody's got a legal case for slander/libel, it's Shadman.

>>91220521
>his art is pretty mediocre
Indeed.I'm fucking unknown, but my art skills are far superior

>>91220566
It deserves a trashcan.

>>91220517
>implying whichever hosting service shadman uses gives a shit

It isn't like they're going to consult a lawyer if they're told that someone is hosting illegal shit. They'll just take a look, and if it's plausible that it MIGHT be illegal, they'll shut it down, because doing anything else is more trouble than it's worth.

>>91220566
Well, that's the thing anon, if it panders to a certain audience (in this case 12-21-year-old boys still in that edgy phase) it does not matter how bad or boring your art is as long as it's consistent.

>>91220521
I've seen some of his recent SFW loli stuff posted here and I'd say it was good enough.

>>91220587
>my art skills are far superior
Okay, let's see them.

>>91220668
>SFW
>loli
Pick one.

>>91220668
Of course, you say that

File: death of strohiem.png (660KB, 637x900px) Image search: [Google]

660KB, 637x900px

I mean seriously, a random drawfag from /a/ has more skill that that edgelord has ever had.

>>91220682
No, I don't want to be responsible for blowing your mind. Sorry anon.

>>91220693

One can draw a little girl without her being naked.

>>91220693
Oh, come on, guys! I'm still here!

File: 1402691645630.jpg (333KB, 1112x1200px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 1112x1200px

>>91220693
Oh look SFW loli
Are you a fucking idiot?

>>91220727
>>91220728
>>91220739
Tell that to the judge.

>>91220575
it's not in the court yet. The company hosting is just exercising their right to check what some users reported.
But they'll get nothing from it, except maybe kicking shadbase out of their servers for being bad press. it's ironic, but his art is too bad to pass as "attempt at real CP". It's just bad taste, which isn't illegal.

>>91219257

The line is drawn at when it stops being about drawn lines you fucking retard.

Otherwise you're basically saying that when a person puts a pen to a piece of paper, there are certain movements you can make with that pen that would constitute as a criminal offence. Its fucking stupid.

>>91220754
How is that an argument? Any lawyer he can pay will just say that and close the case before it's even opened.

>>91220719
>I have the new game but my mom doesn't want me to show you!
hello "that kid", enjoy not being relevant in the adult world.

>>91220815
It's too good for you. Sorry.

>>91219257
>>91219257
this

File: PicsArt_04-02-01.47.14.jpg (76KB, 552x321px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 552x321px

>>91218701
Okay, now I'm convinced you fags are overreacting. It looks like shit sure (the chromatic shit is hurting my eyes), but it isn't bad by any means. It surely isn't grounds to call someone a pedophile, and subsequently ruin his live over. Its pretty obviously a edgy tounge-in-cheek parody.

And most important of all ITS A DRAWING. i can tell no actual children were used for this drawing, and i like to refer to cali when these things occur; "if no child was involved, then it's not child porn. "

>>91218629
>He was drawing YouTubers and YouTubers children
>drawing
>real kids
?

>>91220717
Lots of people on 4chan are better, and there are a lot worse.

Oh come on, Shadman is a multimillionaire and can solve the problems with money.

>>91220935
This doesn't even classify as pornography.
Your thirst for blood is getting completely grounded in fantasy and religious fanaticism

>>91220935
It's a drawing.
You can find it creepy and not like it but if you try to make it out as being immoral or that it should be illegal simply because you do not like it, you're an SJW

>>91220856
Are you stupid or a Shadman fan? This is a little girl based on a real little girl.

>>91220954
What thirst for blood? For calling him a creep? I think you are projecting

>>91220848
>I'm totally not ok BUT
>baseless lies
>"this" ing yourself
you can stop that shit, little warrior, you aren't recruiting anybody in this crusade today.

with the law on CP are strong and strange, loli is illegal is most usa states, and if it depicts a rendering of a real child, or based on a real child it is CP under the law look it up.

>>91220856
Can I ask you a hypothetical question?

If you were to have a daughter, and she was known to make videos on an online platform, and some grown man drew porn of her, how would you feel?

File: IMG_3577.png (176KB, 500x700px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 500x700px

>>91218390
>My plan is to let them go through everything and make them see for themselves

>>91220982
>Are you stupid or a Shadman fan? This is a little girl based on a real little girl.
If he's one he's probably both.

>>91219072
>Child pornography isn't celebrated in Islam

how can one person be so summer?

>>91220962
I find it immoral, but I don't think it accounts for jail time, stop being a whiny faggot and realize not everyone is as edgy as you.

>>91221013
>and if it depicts a rendering of a real child, or based on a real child it is CP under the law look it up.

Only if its traced

>>91221017
Depends on how on-model it is.

>>91220982
No matter who she is. It's not illegal. she's not even naked, so it's pure parody protection law there, not even the muddy grey areas of pornography handheld by normies.

>>91220935
I don't think you're a SJW, anon.

A scold, a prude, and a nazi.

But not a SJW.

>>91221031
Don't you dare insult my 9 year old wife like that infidel!

>>91221032
Then you're a fucking child who has a shallow and immature level of morality.
Nice buzzword though.

>>91221032
>I find it immoral
Don't let the degenerates hear you say that, they'll call you a moralfag and say meany words :(

>>91221006
Kill yourself pedofile.

I agreed with that anon because I think it's creepy when he's drawing an real child. I don't even care what happens to shad legally, I just think it crosses the line, and gets really creepy, when he draws a real person.

>>91220761
t. pedo

>>91221031
It's highly illegal, anon. They behead people for that shit.

>>91221051
All of the buzzwords, nice

>I-if you dislike my god-king's art y-your just a fucking SJW HAHAH! Got you!

The LtCorbis photo would be ruled illegal in any state that's strict on loli/shota. It doesn't matter if she's partially clothed or that it's a microphone; the image is still drawn in a voyeuristic, sexually explicit fashion of an actual child.

>>91221080
>I-if you don't like it then you're edgy!

File: common filth.jpg (18KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 512x512px

>>91221063
OH SHIT! Your right if it makes people feel GOOOD~ then I'm not allowed to judge them

>>91221085
Like those "models" websites that show little girls in skimpy clothes.

Okay everyone is saying Shad isn't in trouble over his art. THEN WHAT THE FUCK ELSE WOULD HE BE IN TROUBLE FOR? I mean he had to close his website for the time being. If it was a personal thing then it shouldn't have effected the site at all.

>>91221101
>I'm not the edgy one for showing off my degeneracy in public, you are for not being into it!

>>91221013
>based on a real child it is CP
no.

>Ever being offended by a drawing

lol

>>91218201
>How do we help him?
With a few million volts

>>91221031
I have no idea about CP in particular, but drawing people is forbidden.

>>91221137
And sending him packs of cigarettes.

>>91221136
>Ever being offended by someone not liking a drawing

top kek

>>91221129
Prove it. Find any law that explicitly backs up that claim.

File: ohno.png (17KB, 580x479px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 580x479px

>>91220935
Nice projection faggot, but not once did i accuse anyone mad of being a ESS-JAY-DOUBLE-U. I said you all are overreacting, which you are.

You put yourself online in youtube format and you are no longer a private entity, but a public figure. You want the pros of the public figure label, but none of the cons? you cant, thats not how life, or the internet, works.

And most important of all, its a mere collection of edgy lines. Does pic related make me a pedophile?
>>91220982
Dont even like shadman
>>91221017
You shouldn't be putting your kid on the internet in the first place

>>91221085
>any state that's strict on loli/shota

So no states.

>>91221078

That's because it's pornography, not because it's child pornography. There's abig difference. Their culture despises most thigns from the internet.

t. upcoming history major.

>>91221159
Who said I was?

File: 1415522430145.png (96KB, 420x248px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 420x248px

>>91218201
I think Shadmang is a pretty mediocre artist, multiple body parts in his drawings are often unsightly, but some of the other artists he features can be fun and his meme drawings can be dank.

>>91220935
That... looks incredibly creepy. Why is the mike jizzing? Can the guy who posted get in trouble for putting it on a blueboard?

>>91221103
>
You can judge them if they're pedophiles. It's ok, noone loves them.

>>91221164
>You shouldn't be putting your kid on the internet in the first place.

I agree 110% but I think she started doing it on her own, and the parents just didn't give a fuck.

>>91221186
No

>>91221043
If you're so sure of that go take pictures of a child jerking off a microphone, flashing her panties, and covering herself in cum while giving lewd and licentious subtitles.

If you somehow aren't getting raped and hanged in prison, then you can talk. Fucking shadposter.

>>91221071
>I just think it crosses the line
So you care. You are just a spineless, double faced retard, all you do is contruct fallacies based on "I claim I not, BUT I am". rinse, repeat. You did it twice already.

>>91221164
Holy shit boy you just got me for that WRONG THINK how dare I find something gross and degenerate. I mean it's literally 2017 what I'm I thinking.

>>91221164
>you are no longer a private entity, but a public figure
Hi Vlad.

>>91221119
See
>>91218390
You fucking idiot. It is his art he's in trouble for.

>>91221172
All porn is outlawed in fundamentalist muslim nations like Pakistan.

It's true that they don't make an exception for Child Pornography.

It's all pornographic, so it's all illegal.

Which is why the guy who wanted to ban porn, not because it was CP, was mocked as supporting Sharia law.

>>91221078
>>91219072
>>91221031
child fiddling then, How do you say pedophiles get stoned? people would love Muslims if that was the case

>>91221169
There are numerous cases of artists and sellers of art getting obscenity charges across the country. Just saying it's art and thinking you are automatically protected doesn't make it so. I can post some of them if you want.

>>91221186
I guess when you spit into the mic so many times it ferments or some shit like that.

>>91218201
>ITT "THERE SHOULD BE A LAW!"
There is no denying that Shad is creepy but it's a bit much demand that someone be killed/put in jail for what is essentially a thought crime.

>>91221241
>people would love muslims

The people who hate muslims, anon, are low IQ retards who don't know anything about them.

>>91221265
uhhh but it like
makes me uncomfortable
so it should be illegal

>>91221208
But it's the current year anon, if you don't support your local pedophile and his "fetish" he might rape your kids which is not his fault in anyway IT'S SOCIETY

>>91221005
read
>>91221137

>>91221117

None of those model websites have images of children meant to simulate sexual acts or with sexually explicit captions.

>>91221265
I agree, people in this thread are mistaking social consequences with lawful ones.

File: rolf.jpg (118KB, 900x885px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 900x885px

>>91221271

File: 1491032725881.gif (1MB, 327x505px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 327x505px

>>91221221
Not an argument

You can hate him all you want, its not pedophilia (even if it's based on someone real). If i make porn of someone based off Amy Winehouse is it necrophilia?

>>91221271
I'm sure you're itching to move to the middle east

>>91221217
>go take pictures
It's really hard to debate when the other side is literally this retarded, everyone, it's really hard. Bring people who actually know what they are talking about please, your dumb animals aren't funny anymore.

>>91221220
>So you care. You are just a spineless, double faced retard, all you do is contruct fallacies based on "I claim I not, BUT I am". rinse, repeat. You did it twice already.
top kek, you're really trying to put me in my place here pedofile. I think it crosses the line = I do not approve of shads work, I don't care if he gets screwed by some lawsuit or not.
That said, I think loli is creepy, and anyone who is into it I automatically think is a creep, but I'm not actively going out of my way to ruin their lives, they can do what they want as long as they don't harm anyone.

File: IMG_3805.jpg (49KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 600x600px

>>91218201
>Fantastic artist
>My favorite

>>91221306
But they're for pedos to fap too.

>>91221271
Or people who live with that trash daily instead of following some millionaires twitters.
The fact you used "IQ" to describe inteligence really shows how deep in the hole of stupidity you are. Literally a fucking retard.

>>91221322
What are we even arguing about? I think Shad's a big faggot and you are getting mad about that for some reason.

Did I hurt your poor fee-fees or something?

>>91221222
But its true. She wants to be a internet celeb? People draw porn of internet celebs, go ask JaidenAnimations

>>91221282
Pretty sure if you give a pedo money he's gonna blow it on candy to grab himself some fresh victims. Send him loli art instead, it's been proven to get pedos to stop hurting real kids.

>>91221216
How can you NOT get in trouble for that? I've gotten posts deleted here for less than that!

>>91221324
On the contrary, anon, I enjoy my free speech and my porn, and I detest religious fundamentalists who would take it away, whether it's Mullah Omar or Mullah Pence.

>>91221359
Cause you're a stupid namefag

>>91221282
Only European sjws are that insane. Or am I wrong? I can't keep up anymore -- are some people really this crazy?

File: IMG_0696.gif (2MB, 500x374px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x374px

>He got away with drawing Loli Hillary, X-23, his own mom, Idubbz with a Loli version of Mongou, and Keemstar's Daughter

>Non-sexual Roblox art got his ass

It's poetry

File: 1490375617049.gif (855KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

855KB, 500x333px

>>91221271
#NOTEVERYMUSLIM

>>91221359
>Don't get him to see a therapist to help with his drug addiction, give him more so he won't hurt anyone for them

Love this logic

>>91221355
Science has proven that bigots have low IQs, anon.

Get over it.

>>91221349

You can't rule a picture of a child in a bikini as child pornography if there is nothing in the or related to the image suggesting sexual activity or portrayal of the child in a sexual matter.

>>91221331
But what's the problem? If it's not pornographic in drawings, how could it possibly be pornographic in photography? If it's pornographic in photography why wouldn't it be when drawn? Would you look at that at work?

So am i the only one who doesn't like the way he draws ass? Too spherical.

>>91221370
>European sjws
You mean Swede? they are the laughing stock of the whole Union.

It's kind of weird how everyone dislikes Shadman for being overly edgy and tryhard, but the moment something bad happens to him, they get equally edgy and tryhard with the whole "hang him I hope he fucking dies in prison he's absolute scum" etc.

I mean I'm not a fan of his art either but y'all motherfuckers need to chill. I just want him to beat this so it won't eventually happen to artists that I actually like.

>>91221370
Just a lot of articles and YouTubers talking about how if you are mean to pedos, that's somehow just as bad as raping children.

Personally, as a non-violent psycopath, I would NEVER hurt anyone, I just have the desire to cut up my family. But don't treat me any differently because of my mental state, that's offensive.

>>91221392
>If it's not pornographic in drawings, how could it possibly be pornographic in photography?
just quoting before you realize the stupidity of the post and delete it.

>this whole retarded thread
>drawing lolicon right now
>zero fucks given

>>91221357
You accused him of being a pedo and i accused you of overreacting. Then you buzzworded me that not thinking he was a pedo is some /pol/ shit hating SJWs and i said it had nothing to do with that, but rather the implications of calling clear parody a crime; explaining further the overreaction. Then you called me a SJW, which is ironic becausw you're the one practicing thought-policing. I said thats not an argument, and here we are.

>>91221403
That's a small minority anon, and most people love seeing people get shit on, not just edgy faggots like Shad.

Stop getting offended whenever your hero Shad gets made fun of.

>>91221383
Are you stupid? Read >>91218390

>>91221385
Last I checked, most drug addiction treatments(that don't included locking the patient up, and many that do), include some sort of substitute, like nicotine patches for smokers. Yeah, some people manage to quit without pharmacological help, but many don't.

>>91219247
He made a very detailed image of the Charging Bull of Wall Street having it on with Fearless Girl.

>>91221391
There you go again.

I hate Shadman but this is stupid. It'd be like declaring drawn porn of an adult is slander/defamation.

>>91221162
I don't think you understand how the law works in America. It's innocent until proven guilty, you need to reference a law explicitly making this illegal for it to be illegal.

So you're either a liberal or a Europoor or even worse, an Aussie. Either way stop talking about things you don't understand.

>>91221412
>as a non-violent psychopath
Edgy.

>>91221419
Yes, I am, so what's the problem? He like's to draw children getting fucked so I came to a logical conclusion?

How is it "thought-policing" by mocking someone or even pointing out the obvious?

Don't get your panties in a twist, it's just banter.

>>91221403
Both Shadman and his critics seem to be pretty big attention whores.

>>91221366
Why even have the name function if you're not supposed to use it? Why even put it there?

>>91218201
IT'S WITH THE WEBSITE.
STOP SAYING IT'S CAUSE OF KIDDY PORN

>>91221450
No shit anon, I'm talking about the people who think it's offensive that pedos (who have not done anything yet) should go to therapy.

>>91221013
>loli is illegal is most usa states
False.
>if it depicts a rendering of a real child, or based on a real child it is CP under the law
Also false.

>>91221478
If you learned what an analogy is anon, that was the point.

>>91221495
You use it if you're worth it.
Like if you're creating content or doing something that you need to be recognized in a single thread.
Not just to use as if this was some forum.
Seriously dude, kill yourself.

>>91221497
And what does the website do?

>>91221417
>drawing lolicon right now
>saying so in an FBI-watched board

>>91221492
>Shadman is the anon swearing that pedos don't exist

>>91221497
STOP YELLING

>>91218390

How about you just upload the images somewhere else until you make a new site

>>91221495
If you have to ask, you need to either lurk more or fuck off.

>>91221499
Truth be told, even if they haven't acted on their urges they probably should seek some sort of mental health help. I mean I can't imagine the stress that comes from living like that.

File: 1490661568114.gif (879KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

879KB, 500x281px

>>91221482
Then we agree.

Its just banter. Its has every right to exist, just like your shitposts have every right to exist, yes?

>>91221417
Don't draw past your curfew, mom might get mad!

>>91221414
If a drawing of a house is not pornographic, how could a photo of a house be pornographic? It's not my fault you can't grasp the transitive property.

>>91220935
Pedos should be castrated

>>91221497
See
>>91218390
Why don't people here read? IT's not hard.

File: 1450132492219.png (2MB, 1498x1200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1498x1200px

There's literally nothing better than watching pedos get BTFO. I know it's bad enough that you guys sit at home alone all day jacking off to pictures of children, but seeing you sick fucks get exposed for what you are and punished is great.

File: 114234234.jpg (8KB, 183x262px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 183x262px

>>91218201
He dresses like a autist plus pedo.
Hope he will go bankrupt and commit suicide.
Also, sued by fucking Roblox

>>91221546
Yes we do, I called Shad a pedo fag, and you got all butthurt about it.

It's funny how that works how the so-called "edgy" people get the most offended.

>>91221499
Fair enough. But the barrier for seeking mental treatment(especially on a subject like that) is very high for most people.

>>91221581
>He dresses like a autist
True. What kind of faggot wears sunglasses indoors? What the hell.

>>91221597
Because they keep being babied like they dindu nuffin, because it's natural to masturbate to children now apparently.

>>91221575
I mean, I get that some people pick it up after ebing desensitized from the glut of porn content available, but I also figure some folks got it from traumatic experiences, or were just born wired wrong. I''d rather they jack it to shit they want rather than abducting kids off the street.

>degenerates make loli art abloo bloo bloo


greetings redditors from 2012

>>91221460
Well there are laws explicitly stating that it is illegal in multiple states, they are called obscenity laws and they decide what art is and isn't covered by the first amendment and there are artists and sellers of art that have served time because of these laws. And none of them have a loli clause saying it's okay because it's a drawing.
Please educate yourself on these issues

>>91221570
>>91221392
Pictures = Real; Tangible; Can find walking on the street
Drawings =/= Real; Tangible; Can find walking on the street

>>91221609
He's missing the samurai sword and fedora to be an "internet badass"

>>91218569
for the money, it's a publicity stunt

>>91221623
Sup, degen.

>>91221623
Hey tumblr.

>>91218617
Cool. If I fugg a kid I won't get in trouble?