The only people who dislike TLK3 are millennials who are butthurt

>>91180521
Wait theres a lion king 3? Wasnt it 1/2

>>91180521
I dislike it because the original is mediocre and Timon and Pumba are not funny enough to carry a movie on their own

File: 1391880980690.png (122KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 625x626px

>>91180521

this was released to a millenial audience. the last i checked, it was loved.

if anything it's the gen x'ers that are butthurt.

keep trying.

File: 1411535848376.jpg (29KB, 230x318px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 230x318px

>>91180521
>Lion King 3
>Not Lion King 1 1/2

>>91180521
I guess that describes me, then because I found it boring as fuck.
The Tunnel Digging song is great, though.

>>91180521
Now, anon, see, this would only really work if anyone ever actually watched this.

I... think... I might have... but I don't remember.

>>91180521


1 and 1/2 was in every way superior sequel to 2. LK2 sucked balls, garbage Sonichu bait shit cartoon with shit quality animation.

>>91180821

Yes but TLK2 had My Lullaby.

>>91182113
It's actually a very shit song. The VA did not bring her A-game. One of Us is much better.

File: 1490680052365.jpg (60KB, 706x706px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 706x706px

>>91180521

>takes place during lion king 1
>name it lion king 3

>>91182278
It's based off Rosencrantz and Guildenstern which is a midquel of Hamlet you fucking retard.
I know this is /co/ but holy shit do people really not know that Lion King is based off of Hamlet?

>>91182427
What does that have to do with the post you quoted?

File: CjLZiFf.png (146KB, 554x439px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 554x439px

>>91180521
It came out when I was a kid, must've been about 7 I think (2004, right?), and like all kids I didn't give a shit that it was direct-to-DVD trash and enjoyed it, my older siblings who were in their late teens-early 20s at the time however acted like it was a crime against humanity. So I'm going to say it's more of a Gen X-er/80s/early 90s kid thing than a millennial thing, these terms are getting really confusing and arbitrary at this point. So yeah, kids like it and that's all that really matters.

>>91182521
Remember when every older kid got mad as hell about the DTV sequels, and we just liked them because they were cheap but reasonably well-made?

>>91180521
I don't think you know what age range is millenials part of.

>>91180521
>millennials
Leave this place and never come back.

>>91182521
Everyone born in the 90s is a millenial dude.,

Didn't the film have a sort of MST3K format where Timon and Pumba were watching their own movie?

File: bueno.jpg (72KB, 600x607px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 600x607px

>>91182538
>had about 6 Beethoven movies on DVD I'd just kept from Blockbuster
>had at least 4 Air Buds movies
>Rugrats in Paris, Thornberries/Rugrats crossover and All Dogs Go To Heaven 2 were two of my favorite movies ever as a kid
>seen almost every DTV sequel, especially loved Return of Jafar, Tarzan 2, The Fox and the Hound 2 and Stitch Has a Glitch
>all those delicious 90s kid tears from my siblings raining down on me for it
>thoroughly convinced at the time they were just jelly about not getting sequels to all these movies when they were kids

>>91182605
I know that. '82-'99. OP clearly doesn't though and probably thinks millennial = born in 2000 or after so I'm just going along with his definition of the term to avoid having to explain shit to him.

>>91180521
>>91182278
>Lion King 3
Was it not called Lion King 1 ½? At least I think so when I owned this on DVD

>>91182427

That's a super simplistic view of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, but it's not surprising to hear from an anon trying to sound intellectual.

>>91182700
>>91182658

>"The Lion King 1½ (known as The Lion King 3: Hakuna Matata outside of North America) is a 2004 Americananimated film produced by DisneyToon Studios and released by Walt Disney Pictures and Buena Vista Distribution."

just fucking use google, dude

>>91182727
It was called 1 1/2 in latinamerica though.
But who gives a fuck.

>>91182727
thanks anyways anon

>>91182427

It was based off of Kimba the white lion.Hamlet was a cover up.

>>91183261
There's literally nothing similar with Kimba there.

>>91180521
>millinials
>lion king 3
>not lion king 1/2

Well you deserved to be raped in the ass until you shit blood you little cuck

>>91183953

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/6272316

"literally" my ass.

File: 610.jpg (73KB, 460x459px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 460x459px

>>91180521
I know the reason why these films are hated. It's mainly muh corporate Disney and milking franchise schlock. And yeah, there's definitely a couple DTV sequels which suck hard (Beauty and the Beast sequels say hi), but I think some get unnecessarily criticized for what they're worth. The Lion King, Aladdin, and Lilo & Stitch sequels are especially good in my opinion, and LK1½ has some genuinely hilarious moments imo.

>>91180704
1 and a 1/2 if memory hasn't failed yet

>>91180765
i found this one from the credits better as a kid. Kinda makes me nostalgic now

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWYBsfVvzak

>>91182521
my baby sister unironically loves LK2 more than the original.

I hope she realises the incest subtext when she gets older, kek

>>91180821
The only thing good about 2 is the not one of us song

>>91182521
>/80s/early 90s kid than a millenial
80's, 90's kids are THE millenials you dumb twat.

File: headline7240.jpg (10KB, 224x170px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 224x170px

>>91180753
I remember when "Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa" was called "Madagascar: The Crate Escape"

they should really put ("Title Pending)" for that kind of shit

>people giving a shit about direct-to-video Disney movies

Name 3 direct-to-video Disney movies that can qualify as good or "kino."

You have 10 seconds

>>91180521
I've still never seen this.

It's not even that I think it would somehow retroactively ruin Lion King or even that I expect it to be shit. I just don't give enough of a fuck about Timon or Pumbaa to watch them for ~90 minutes.