I actually had some hope for this. Granted there have only

File: not_impressed.png (50KB, 281x213px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 281x213px

>Sony does it again

>>91136537
oh dear

the trailer looked decent and it kind of resembled an episode of the cartoon writing wise.

>>91137042
Maybe it'll be an underrated gem. It just doesn't strike me as being terrible.

>>91137099
>It just doesn't strike me as being terrible.
>Sony Pictures.

>>91137134
Still better than Illumination.

>>91137181
That's like saying rotten fruit is better than shit.

>>91136537

The trailers look well animated but the plot looks like unvarnished GURL POWAH

I'll probably watch it when it hits netflix

>expecting anything involving the Smurfs to be good
It was doomed from the start.

>>91136537
>Granted there have only been 8 reviews.
I'm glad you acknowledged that. Usually people who start RT threads go apeshit over single digit amounts of reviews.

>>91138228
it was less girl power and more an answer to where are all the female smurfs aside from the ones created by Gargamel?

the art was amazing, how couln't they score at least a mediocre score

>>91137181
>muh god Sony
>b.b.but illumination!
The pattern of all Sonyfans no matter the media

>>91137181
Not at making money.

>>91138495
Well, the most recent trailers paint the female Smurf tribe as being "badass warriors", and even have a line with Papa Smurf saying "I'm the leader of the Smurfs" and getting told "No, *I'm* the leader of the Smurfs", with a shit-eating grin.

It's just dumb and unnecessary, considering the Gargamel plot.

>>91138972
>It's just dumb and unnecessary, considering the Gargamel plot.

Not really. There was never any explanation for where the village came from aside from the nebulous idea of a stork. This addresses that imo.

>>91137299

Rotting fruit might contain alcohol.

>>91139085
Storks are real how do you think we got here dumbfuck?

File: 1466055403518.png (80KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 256x256px

>>91136537
>having hope for a Smurf movie

>>91137042
Looking at the trailers, it did have a lot of child pandering humor.

>>91138495
>an answer to where are all the female smurfs
why would smurfs even need females? It was a non issue from the start.

>>91137181
As much as I despise the minions Illumination is honestly doing better than Dreamworks lately.

>>91139350
where did the other smurfs in the village come from then other than the stork for baby (and he is portrayed as special in the cartoon)?