3 movie Spider-men and Tobey is the only Peter who actually was

>>91086121
why are you trying to defend pieces of crap? every Spidey movie released thus far has been shit.

and yeah, I know people like Spidey 1 and 2 because of nostaligia, but c'mon guys, power ranger "finish it" Gobby and "muh wife" Ock were terrible. Spidey 3 was terrible. They were all terrible. You're trying to say a sprinkle coated turd is better than a sprinkeless turd.

Spider-man should have both organic and mechanical webs which should bring about how hes half dude half spider or something

The organic part is how his body is constantly producing webs through his wrists, but the webs are soft and stringy and he is not able to 'shoot' them, instead he is able to wrap around people (similar to pic related), swing on buildings by throwing the webs like lassos instead of directly shooting them

The mechanical part then showcases Peter's intellect in that he was able to create a way for him to shoot his webs out similar to how he is doing it now, it would also give him a weakness that if his mechanical shooters fail, he is forced to use a more primitive spider martial arts by wrapping people up

>>91086202
Spider-man 3, the "bad movie" of the saga, is still miles ahead to most of the MCU and DCEU.

Not even joking. Raimi is a film director who understands film language. Even with all the shit the studio forced him to do in 3, his job as director still elevates the movie way higher than anything Sony, WB or Marvel did later.

Spider-man trilogy is a trilogy of films who happen to star a superhero. They are not capeshit flicks.

>>91086269
Spider Man 3 could have been avoided if Sony in all their fuckery would have just let Raimi make his vulture movie

File: 1460809388842.jpg (32KB, 550x633px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 550x633px

>>91086269
Spidey 3 could've been decent at the very least if Sony hadn't forced Raimi to put Venom in it.

Even still, it would've felt like they had dragged Harry's story into it and it would've taken away from focusing on Sandman.

>>91086202
Anon, there's bait, and then there's looking desperate. Come on, you can do better than this.

>>91086399
yeah, you're right, anon, my bad

>>91086121
>Not realizing from the trailers and interviews that Peter is going to be tired of Tonys shit by the end of Homecoming.

>>91086121
>it's another let's pretend the actors write the script thread

>>91086121
You don't think that was done on purpose?

Dumbing the character down? Making this "superman" more relatable to the "everyman?"

And in turn, dumbing down the everyman. That's what it's all about, my son. Crippling the competition. And who's the competition? You are.

They're making you dumber, making everybody dumber, and rubbing our faces in it as they do it to grease the skids that much more.

Don't you think about fighting back?

Does it make anybody else angry? Would anybody like to do something about it?

>>91086269
100% correct. He actually made that piece of shit watchable, and when you look at the script, that's fucking hard to believe.

It's amazing what a difference it makes when a film is directed by one guy trying to communicate his singular artistic vision through the medium of his beloved craft . . . as opposed to what MCU and DCU are doing, which is directing by a committee of hand-picked dorkwads who are specifically picked for their lack of balls and their willingness to take notes from the even less talented producers upstairs.

Basically to use a Jim Cornette reference, they got a couple of studios full of Vince Russos cranking out capeshit flicks for like 200 million a pop.

And the retards are dumb enough to go see the shit, so what the fuck? Hats off to them, it's a hell of a scam.