[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

The new Littlest Pet Shop cartoon will be made by Boulder Me

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 56
Thread images: 14

File: boulder media.jpg (153KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]
boulder media.jpg
153KB, 1200x675px
The new Littlest Pet Shop cartoon will be made by Boulder Media, the same guys who worked on the Danger Mouse reboot, Foster's and the first season of Gumball.

http://www.bouldermedia.tv/2017/03/23/boulder-media-significantly-expands-dublin-animation-studio-with-additional-crew-and-new-space/

What do you think, /co/?
>>
It's been so long I've forgotten what the name of the waifu in the last one was.
>>
>>91030942
Sunni? Sunil?, something like that.
>>
>>91030942
Is it the purple dog?
>>
>>91030847
Didn't Hasbro buy Boulder a while back?
>>
>>91031236
Yes, they did.
>>
>>91030942
The dog? Zoe Trent or something.
>>
File: would co fap to this.jpg (111KB, 400x600px) Image search: [Google]
would co fap to this.jpg
111KB, 400x600px
bump
>>
>>91030847
>What do you think, /co/?
I mean...it's a show for young girls. I'd be interested if I were ten years younger. I know this is the board that created bronies but that was once and it will hopefully never happen again.
>>
File: 1260411803127.png (13KB, 291x311px) Image search: [Google]
1260411803127.png
13KB, 291x311px
>>91030847
>hasbro owns boulder media

When the hell did that happen?
>>
>>91030847
>No humans
Pass
>>
File: biskitslaughing.jpg (28KB, 500x370px) Image search: [Google]
biskitslaughing.jpg
28KB, 500x370px
>>91033053
>2017
>still being ageist and sexist about toons
Ok gramps
>>
>>91033143
Last July

http://newsroom.hasbro.com/mediakit/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=979460
http://variety.com/2016/tv/news/hasbro-boulder-media-dublin-acquired-1201813589/
http://www.cartoonbrew.com/business/hasbro-gets-serious-animation-acquisition-irelands-boulder-media-141605.html
>>
File: 1420913609977.png (91KB, 330x334px) Image search: [Google]
1420913609977.png
91KB, 330x334px
>>91030847
>no clumsy but well-meaning gecko
>no nervous magic mongoose with glorious hips
>no funny skunk with an addictive laugh
No thanks
>>
>>91033413
Surely something in this show will be sexy
>>
>>91030847
I definitely wasn't digging the weird stringy art style of the first show. This looks truer to the original toys. I think I'll enjoy it. I thought bringing humans to the franchise was a mistake.
>>
>>91033144
Strange, the fact that it wastes screen time on humans is usually my biggest problem with shit like this and Transformers.
>>
another bump
>>
>>91033053
Id be interested if it was still 2010
>>
Tell me it's gonna be on Discovery and not CN or some shit where it will be stuck at unwatchable hours with cripples promotion
>>
someone post the webm of the beach photos
>>
Is there anywhere to download all the seasons?
>>
>goat
may give this one a shot
>>
>>91030847
>Littlest petshop
>Not in a petshop

Rly makes u think
>>
>>91045270
It will most likely be a pet shop that has a portal to this world of Pawtucket.
>>
>>91030942
Twilight I Think.
>>
>>91034671
>>91030847
I wanna fuggu the kuroneko.
>>
File: 1431051609394.png (369KB, 289x460px) Image search: [Google]
1431051609394.png
369KB, 289x460px
>>91048401
>this world of Pawtucket.
>>
File: IntoTheTrashItGoesRoy.png (398KB, 688x408px) Image search: [Google]
IntoTheTrashItGoesRoy.png
398KB, 688x408px
>>91030847

>No more Semen Demon Twins
>fanart will all be 100% furfaggotry instead of 95% like it was for the old cartoon.
>>
>>91048603
FURRIES
>>
>>91030847
>no Vancouver Voice Actors
>no Daniel Ingram songs

Not off to a good start.
>>
>>91054197
>>no Daniel Ingram songs
Says who
>>
Is Potatoland slowly form a niche in the Animation industry now?
>>
File: 810.png (198KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]
810.png
198KB, 500x667px
>>91030847
Having a new show so soon after the last one seems like trouble, but apparently people liked the Danger Mouse reboot, so this could be good.
>>
>>91054424
He's the composer for DHX. If they're not being done by DHX they'll probably have someone else doing them.
>>
File: Yeah, take it off.png (214KB, 504x615px) Image search: [Google]
Yeah, take it off.png
214KB, 504x615px
Do you think he was offended that Blythe told Youngmee about her ability before him?
>>
>>91054444
There has always been a fairly vibrant animation scene in Ireland.
>>
What happened to those MEGA links for 1080p episodes?
Did anyone keep them?
>>
>>91030847
on various hands:

>for being from a different studio it looks like the same fucking shit just with a different cast of characters/animals
>they could have just not fucking canceled the previous LPS and/or waited longer before starting a new one

but on a different hand:
>one of the main characters is a goat

god fucking dammit unless it turns out to be some of the worst trash possible i'm already sold.
>>
>>91055801
>toy sales are still shit
>teens still complain that it's not "old lps"
>Hasbro are too stupid to realise the toys are just shit and always will be
>cancel this series too

The sad thing is, with it being owned by a toy company, a reboot of the 2012 series in the future is impossible
>>
>>91030847
Even if it's good, I still can't imagine getting into it. I liked the 2012 series and only liked that series. I never even took notice of the franchise before then (and honestly those 'old LPS' the kids keep crying about look ugly as hell).
It was the same for me with Digimon when I was a kid. I watched Adventure, 02 and Tamers. After that I stopped caring.
>>
Looks flanderized as shit, not even one character stands out.

creativity is dead
>>
>>91057216
>>91057133

You might as well consider "old LPS" as "the 2005 LPS" because the franchise dates all the way back to the 90's.

The designs from 1992 to 1997 looked a lot more realistic, honestly.
>>
>>91030847
Looks like shit, the previous cast was a lot better.
>>
File: littlest90s.jpg (32KB, 250x450px) Image search: [Google]
littlest90s.jpg
32KB, 250x450px
>>91057257
That isn't what anybody was ever talking about though toy wise, and cartoon wise there was nothing other than this obscure POS that had no fans whatsoever
>>
>>91057478
There have been vintage toy collectors that were collecting 90's LPS.
>>
This show is going to have SO MUCH PORN
>>
File: penny.jpg (18KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
penny.jpg
18KB, 500x500px
I get the feeling Sunil, Penny, Zoe and the other will still appear as toys, even after the new series starts airing.
Pic related is the most recent toy of Penny and she's even called Penny Ling on the box. They just changed her to match the recent look.
>>
>>91057240
Really? Because I could see that the goat is going to be the nervous one, the hamster will be the troublemaker, the cat could be snarky and/or laidback, and the dog will be the one who would be happy as fuck most of the time.
>>
>>91058213
"flanderized" is just another word overused and not understood on here just like "egdy" and "mary sue"
>>
>>91058213
The hamster will be the friend that no one likes but hang out with anyway.
>>
File: LPS_Show-title.png (549KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
LPS_Show-title.png
549KB, 1280x720px
goat is Sunil reincarnated
cat is Zoe reincarnated

I'll wait for a trailer if not the first two episodes before dismissing it by a picture alone but, it looks too cutesy so far. And too much samey- ness. Sorry for using baby talk type words.

But look at pic related. I know we can't rewind and unsee the 2012 series so yeah there's some bias to my opinion that comes from seeing the show and knowing the characters personalities but, just try to pretend you're seeing this picture for the first time and you've never watched the 2012 series before.. doesn't that main cast at least look more varied in their designs & personalities than the main cast in OP's picture?
>>
>>91055141
Did you actually watch the show? He's the chillest motherfucker and always knew.
>>
>>91058690
Well, I wasn't being serious to being with.
But please, I'm the biggest Roger fag. I know he's chill.
>>
>>91058664
1. They have to look cute, of course. Otherwise, we would have hoards of little girls screaming they want the "old" (read: 2005) toys back.

2. I could see that the new characters each have different blending shades in their designs. They are not uniform in color. The 2012 characters weren't as well, but the new ones look unique when they have the colors blend with each other like gradients.

3. I could tell that four of the six new characters have a distinct personality, especially by their expressions. Comparably, the characters from those webisodes may look cute, but they lack a unique personality that I could tell apart.
>>
The first thing I remember seeing of the 2012 series was pictures of Zoe and only Zoe when one guy insisted on making threads focusing on her. (I didn't even know there was a human at first)
We got Zoe's introducing everyone song, which was catchy as hell, and I was interested right away. Mainly because there hadn't been an LPS series in a long time and since I watched the other Hasbro show, I figured LPS would be good too.

The reason I'm not interested in this new one is because of why it even exists. Dumb kids complaining because the franchise isn't EXACTLY how it was when they were young. And Hasbro thought the best way to fix this was to cancel a cartoon which was actually doing well ratings wise (considering what channel it aired on where ratings are fucking low as hell for everything) and replace it without a second thought. If toy sales were shit before, they're going to stay shit. Those kids will never be happy with LPS because it can never be how it was before. Things change.
If they had aired it on a channel you don't have to pay for, maybe things could have been better. And replacing the HUB was the stupidest thing they could have done. Discovery Family puts very little effort in advertising their shows.
Thread posts: 56
Thread images: 14


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.