How different do you think the Lion King would have been if Walt

Lots of nightmare fuel.

File: 123423445345.png (760KB, 1000x500px) Image search: [Google]

760KB, 1000x500px

>>90969494
>A fuckton more racist, like JIM the CROW (stereotypes of a 'coon'; because they are literally anthropomorphic black birds); more thoughtful racist jakes in layers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzhDbAiWRRs


Lets not forget that the Lion King is in Africa...

>>90969494
I don't think Walt would want a murderer to voice the main character.
Also tezuka was a friend, I don't think he would sic the lawyers on his estate

>>90969494
you mean if he was in his 90s?

im sure there would be a scene of simba's mom dying too

File: marijuana-propaganda-beware.jpg (87KB, 600x471px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 600x471px

>>90970302
They even gave one of the crows redeyes, implying he is on marihuana which was considered to be a primarily black drug (which is arguably still the case).


If you really want to get deep into it, considering the time, it was actually known that marijuana caused black and hispanic men to lose their minds and actively 'hunt' white women to rape. Affectively, it was seen as cocaine laced with bathsalt at the time, but for minority men; despite actually being much safer than alcohol.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXPOw2unxy0
Thus it is possibly implying that he perhaps 'might' have raped 'white doves'.

>>90970302
The film would be a thinly veiled right-wing criticism against egalitarianism, a villainous demagogue who rallies the starving underclass with promises of food thwarted by a heroic monarchist who puts them back in their place. A society where the wealthy upper classes are literally allowed to eat the poor lower classes, and it's portrayed as a GOOD thing. And the hyenas would just be black and hispanic stereotypes, one of them might just be retarded for laughs.

Yes, a very different film indeed.

File: bugs.jpg (15KB, 500x481px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 500x481px

>>90971186

>>90970302
In case anyone was wonder who where the uncle-toms that sold their souls for this movie: the crows were all played by white men cackling in a sound booth about black racial stereotypes, for a children's film of all projects.

>>90969494
>>90969494
He probably wouldn't green light the Lion King because Bambi had a similar premise and did it better. But he would probably be way too old by the 90s and would probably be more focused on other dreams, such as running the EPCOT city he envisioned.

>>90971233
No one assumed Walt Disney would actually hire niggers to do voices for one of his pictures.

>>90971094
>marijuana caused black and hispanic men to lose their minds and actively 'hunt' white women to rape
Luckily we live in the modern age where we understand that marijuana is a pretty safe drug and blacks/mexicans are just natural rapists, even while sober.

>>90971186
>He said "A fuckton more racist", not racist or more rightwing.
>hyenas mainly used the sassy women trope while the other had a Mexican accent; not really races in and of itself
If anything, the hyenas were the closest thing to being arguably racist, and they were much more tamed than Dumbo for example.

>>90971371
>and men of all races in general
Mainly a tiny minority of the population which are mainly based on accusations, not proven facts; pretty much feminist '1/5' statistical logic, but actually much less reliable and vague.

File: 1450848920984.png (147KB, 233x268px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 233x268px

>>90971472
>Mainly a tiny minority of the population which are mainly based on accusations, not proven facts; pretty much feminist '1/5' statistical logic, but actually much less reliable and vague.


It's funny, because these same people who vilify entire minority demographics as rapists then go an try to denounce the feminist 1/5 women being raped or sexually harassed in college campuses, workspaces, outside, or in their own homes by their partners by your same logic.

So basically, when it males in general or especially white men, it is disingenuous and not representative of them. But bring in minority men, and the whole logic flips on its head almost instantaneously.

File: 3639300267_bf79c7d8ec.jpg (84KB, 424x330px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 424x330px

>>90971472
>>90971689
That is because only white women tell the truth when being raped by a nonwhite. It's always bullshit when it was claimed to be done by white men, because only niggers and spics rape.


I'm sure the black man you caught her on your bed with was rapping her for weeks while you were at work.

File: That+s+a+step+too+far+_ff56945bb739c92b9f2f7b1079720057.jpg (49KB, 476x377px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 476x377px

>>90971186
It would not be 'criticism', according to your own description; just pro fascist capitalism
It also had little to nothing to do with 'egalitarianism', but more so against individualism.

File: dancing-with-dwarfs-snow-white-27822174-300-225.gif (1MB, 300x225px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 300x225px

>>90969494
It would probably be more "hunky dory" and "cuter". Somewhat similar to the earlier years of Disney.

but also with visually darker toned scenes when things got scary or very serious

>>90971689
>rapists then go an try to denounce the feminist 1/5 women being raped or sexually harassed in college campuses, workspaces, outside, or in their own homes by their partners by your same logic.

Or by the fact that the studies that produce those statistics are utter horse shit?

>It's funny, because these same people who vilify entire minority demographics as rapists then go an try to denounce the feminist 1/5 women being raped or sexually harassed in college campuses, workspaces, outside, or in their own homes by their partners by your same logic.

Comparing two different strawman arguments by asserting that the other person probably holds those two beliefs and is hence probably contradictory is a truly horrendous argumentative tactic.

File: f26.png (192KB, 468x347px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 468x347px

>>90972969
>Or by the fact that the studies that produce those statistics are utter horse shit?
Yes, but just as unreliable and unofficial, which is the point; irony being this is actually more reliable in comparison.

>Comparing two different strawman arguments by asserting that the other person probably holds those two beliefs and is hence probably contradictory is a truly horrendous argumentative tactic
Well, do you believe in a witch-trial or 'guilty until proven innocent'? Most would rightfully say "no".
Or defend witch-trials when it suits you/them/whomever, but appose it when it does not fit you fancy; despite being just as fallacious, vague, and based on accusations rather than actual proven facts...
Sounds more like it really translates to: "Do not point or call out the hypocrisy."