This is why people don't take animation seriously. Beca

>>89477412

Will the whole movie be vertical? Jesus. I though we had addressed this since Gloves and Boots made their PSA

File: 1483264280664.gif (438KB, 294x342px) Image search: [Google]

438KB, 294x342px

>our FIRST movie

File: lcmd.jpg (72KB, 437x356px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 437x356px

>>89477412
>>89477633
>our first movie
>tfw there will be a sequel no matter what the final tally for this first film is at the box office

File: 1485126637688.jpg (237KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1920x1080px

>there is someone out there in the world who would say "One ticket for the Emoji movie please!"

>>89477802

watch this movie win oscar 2017 because "my kids liked it"

>>89477870

What competition will this movie have outside of Pixar? Despicable Me 3?

>>89477890
smurfs, lego batman

>>89477699
Isn't the studio going to go bankrupt if this fails hard enough?

>>89477633
>>89477802
Doug (big-nosed vest Doug, not angry bald reviewer Doug) said the same thing about his movie, and they only made one. It's possible they won't make another movie if it bombs hard enough.

But I definitely see them at least making a series of shorts, a short film, maybe even a cartoon series, ala Angry Birds.

>>89477932
angry birds at least some kind of logical universe and plot

this does not.

>>89478012
Of course. I never said that they'd have any good material to work with, just that they'd market the shit out of the Emojis and make a dozen cartoons off of them.

File: 1484107734698.png (39KB, 147x181px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 147x181px

tfw you're living in the "Patrick Stewart voices a literal piece of shit" timeline

>>89477525
There's a widescreen version of the teaser too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uV9LYMAEnRA

>>89477890
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animated_feature_films_of_2017
Pixar's Coco will win.

>>89477412
why is "meh" a depressive? it should just be casually indifferent.