Why does every Post Disney Renaissance movie feel like it's

Wider audience = More butts in seats

Not just with ages. They keep using the male/female duo and gender-neutral titles because they can sell it to boys and girls.

>>89342283
They finally realized adults are the ones who buy the movie tickets and subsequent DVD/Blu Ray releases.

>>89342315
Which boy is going to want to see a musical with a female protagonist?

>>89342283
>Big Hero Six
>Made for anyone but children

Whut

yeah like the hunchback of notre dame right...

>>89342416
pretty much, yeah. I don't see how a kid is gonna understand the politics of the Medieval Clergy.

File: 1473603614494 etrigan.jpg (486KB, 3000x4000px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 3000x4000px

>>89342283
Walt Disney said that "THE DAY THAT WE START MAKING THINGS JUST FOR CHILDREN TO ENJOY, IS THE DAY THAT THE COMPANY WENT TO SHIT".

It was obviously not with these words, but you get the message.

He never wanted for the movies to be "kiddy movies".

Pic not related.

>>89342283
Because it is.

I liked Moana.

>>89342283

Disney's movies have always been for a general audiences. "Safe for kids" does not mean "made for only kids".

File: f7FdEdG.jpg (10KB, 260x194px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 260x194px

>>89342750
Disney movies have rarely, if ever, been aimed exclusively at kids. There's a lot of aspects to them that only adults would recognize.

>>89342750
Middle Ground usually just means lackluster for every type of audience.

>>89342840

It's not a middleground. There's a difference between something made for kids (shit like blues clues) and something made so that kids can watch it without parents getting angry or children getting scared (like disney movies).

>>89342373
The same ones that saw Frozen and Tangled - And for whom those movies were renamed.