>YFW the "experimental age" of Disney movies that were more deep like this, Lilo and Stitch, and Treasure Planet (And even though you had shit like Home on The Range and Chicken Little, we got Meet The Robinsons which fits the mold of the others.) is gone.
Sure you can say what you will about them, but they still had their ideas in the right place.
>>89087067
You did kinda have Zootopia though. That movie did try to be more "deep" then other recent Disney movies.
>>89087092
how it was going to be "deep" ?
>>89087067
>hamfisted environmentalism
>deep
You trolling, right?
>>89087488
It originally was a dystopian story with carnivores being second class citizens who had to wear electroshock collars.
>>89087653
that was the OPPOSITE of deep. it simply painted the goverment as the bad guys and the predators as the persecuted minorities.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHURiOqMVTI
>>89087697
As opposed to what, prince saves princess?
>>89087815
social commentary on biases/stereotypes
I like the setting and music, but every time I even consider watching this I remember that it has an annoying kid character in it.
And it has the two moose in it that were in the commercial.
And I know I just can't deal with that, not anymore.
>>89087902
but every kid loves that bear cub with his funny animal voice!
>>89087902
>consider watching this
Don't. It's about as entertaining as an actual walk in the woods, and I'm not talking nature park woods, I'm talking off the side of the road woods.
>>89088020
I've literally not gone a single day without one of those in the past 2 years
So I've never seen "Brother Bear 2", but does this chick fuck the bear or what?
>>89088343she gets turned into a bear
>>89088572
But is there any pre-transformation boning? That's what matters.
>>89088624
It's a direct to DVD Disney sequel so no just annoyance and disappointment
>>89087067
The only film in the "experimental age" that was good was Lilo and Stitch anyway.