>Dipshit critics who spent the better part of the year tr

>>88931523
>caring about what dipshit critics think

>>88931523
People trashed the Flintstones comic?

>>88931535
This, who freaking care about their OPINIONS.

>>88931541
Most of the major comics sites gave it pretty middling reviews at first for being "NOT MUH FLINTSTONES"

Guys like KC Green said roughly the same.

>>88931535
>>88931556
Low-selling comic books often live or die on word of mouth and a book that consistently gets bad reviews likely doesn't last long. This was very much a case of the audience getting it, but critics sabotaging it.

Lucky me, I got on here to ask you guys about when the next Flinstones story time is.

Last one I read ended with them killing the Tree People and Barney adopting BamBam after finding him left out in the battlefield

>>88931560
KC Green hasn't done anything good or been relevant in like six years anyway

>>88931523
None of these HB comics were any good.

The reviews in the start were so fucking infuriating, they basically summed down "not to muh liking" and offered no actual criticism. Look at the IGN or some other reviews of earlier issues, they criticize the writing and art for being literally "not muh." Then there was also that one dipshit critic for newsarama who gave an issue low rating because a joke he didn't understand triggered him. So fucking infuriating and retarded.

>>88932459
What joke?

>>88931657
There was one the other day.
Approached organized religion and the concept of buying forgiveness for your sins.

This just goes to show how much salt these "critics" are worth
Fuck these faggots

>>88931657
The newest one should still be in the archive
Be careful though because the thread went into a debate really fast

>>88932506
The fact that Joe, a veteran buddy of Fred and Barney, was suicidal and treated with negligence at best.
Took the bullet for Pebbles and st the end of the comic, a monkey got a statue.

>>88931523
It's neither as good as libcucks think it is nor as bad as critics do. It's firmly average. Why are you guys acting like it's an instant classic?

>>88932506
The issue that had military vet trying to commit suicide. He didn't get that issue was trying to be a satire about how people put more value in futile things than real people and thought that it was trying to make some edgy jokes about retired war veterans.

>>88931523
OHHHH NOBODY GIVES A SHIT

>critics apparently didn't like it
>/co/ loved it from the start
>now critics love it
But I thought /co/ and 4chan in general were bad at recommendations.

>>88932628
>>88932617
How the fuck do you not get that joke? I love the Flintstones comic, but it's about as subtle as a brick to the face.

>>88932625
Why do you think it's average? Aside from triggering your autism by being anti extremist piece of fiction.

>>88932672
His reading comprehension was shit probably.

>>88932672
You are still surprised how dense most people are when it comes to basic reading comprehension?

>>88932672

critics are generally not people with things like "comprehension above a fourth grade learning level."

>>88932016
>As critics warm to it, contrarians turn on it.

>>88932459
I don't understand how you could read the book and see it only at surface level.

>>88932830
At least movie critics are usually people educated in films and with enough intelligence to get hired by a newspaper. I feel like 99% of comic critics are just some college drop out with a blog.

>>88931523
"The whole point of civilisation is to get someone else to do your killing for you"

Yeah, GJ cavemen, you figured it out, now, wanna work for a PMC?

>>88931657
"WE PARTICIPATED IN A GENOCIDE BARNEY"
"Whoa, what's this 'we' shit, I just watched. And masturbated. And stole one of the surviving children."

>>88931541
Newsarama completely missed the point of issue 3 with the veteran dying and not getting respect and thought they killed off a character just for a joke. They are really thick.

>>88932595
>This just goes to show how much salt these "critics" are worth

It kind of is telling when all these outspoken people don't get material that isn't blockbuster, easy to consume messages. It's like the people who argue that Winter Soldier is a "political thriller"

>>88932625
I think it's hitting notes that a lot of other comic writers are too dumb to get. I mean, how many other comics in the big two of late tackle the subject of soldier PTSD

>>88932902
>At least movie critics are usually people educated
No.

>>88932672
Keep in mind, Newsarama gave "Worst X-Man Ever #1" a low score because "The main character complains about not having a girlfriend, yet he judges girls on their looks. Wow, what a likable protagonist" That was their argument. We're stuck with people who think that heroes HAVE to be likable and right from the get go.

>>88932895
We're in a world where Squirrel Girl gets good reviews and Mockingbird gets perfect scores for a cover.

a friend of mine tried to pitch this to me on its comedy which, from what he showed me, seemed quite lame.

/co/ pitches this to me on its social relevance but, from what i have seem, it all seems embarrassingly unsubtle and shallow. is this only "good" when compared to the average capeshit drek coming out?

i'm bothered by it being Flintstones(TM) not because i have nostalgia for the flitnstones or "not muh" but simply because we already have too damn many remakes, reboots, remakes, grim-dark reimaginings, sequels, etc. if you've got a legitimate point to make or story to tell, why attach it to a previously existing IP?

>>88932923
When Ferreyra did those fill ins for Suicide Squad I read a 3/10 review there where the dumb fuck said the art is too bright and not a good fit for such a dark and gritty comic. Yes, it's the same year Ferreyra did the third Colder mini.

>>88932997
The ones worth listening to. Sadly sites like RT have legitimized blogger critics who think that Summer blockbusters are high art.

File: 80 Shrug.jpg (21KB, 599x448px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 599x448px

>>88933036
How about you try out the comic for yourself?

>>88932459
>Critics attack DC because NOT MUH without actual regard for the material.
Sounds right.

>>88933036
>we already have too damn many grim-dark reimaginings
No

You're kind of like those broken record capeshitters that kept crying about "enough with the car and gritty, time for some light and fun superheroes" when light and fun outnumber the dark by triple the amount, or maybe even more.

>>88933053
i'm a busy man, anon. and my back-log is enormous. but you're right in that that's what i should do.

>>88933036
>if you've got a legitimate point to make or story to tell, why attach it to a previously existing IP?
Why are you reading any Marvel or DC if you hold this opinion?

The H-B comics were launched under the direction of Dan Didio and I assume people pitched for them like with any comic. Mark Russell who had written the Prez revival got the Flintstones, and honestly I've never read anything with this exact note of criticizing and commenting on society as we know it from the perspective of an emerging society, one in which non-civilization is in living memory. And it sends up the fake modern life of the original Flintstones too, and uses the show for some of its gags.

It definitely gains from being a Flintstones thing IMO, but I suppose you can only try and see for yourself.

>>88933044
>The ones worth listening to
So... nobody?

>>88933088
Move it up your back log then?
I mean, how much do you trust /co/'s opinion?

>>88933040
I think what kills me about most comic critics is that they seem to just like what other people like. They go with what the Internet is making a fuss about and poo poo anything that won't be buzzworthy

>>88932902
*Some movie critics anon. Although yes they're actually somewhat educated in their field. Average comic reviewer can't even criticize bookcon technical level beyond "art wasn't good" or "pacing felt off." Like seriously these fuckers never actually bothered to read how to comic 101 or some other basic books about this medium.

>>88932902
>At least movie critics are usually people educated in films and with enough intelligence to get hired by a newspaper.
LOL

>>88932665
/co/ is the only reliable source of comic recommendations on the internet

>>88933119
>I mean, how much do you trust /co/'s opinion
Seriously. How can you people ask
>is this good
And then value a stranger's opinion so much that a yes or no makes or breaks it for you?

>>88933127
This is definitely the case.

>>88932702
It's a ham-fisted take on issues that are way more complicated than they make them out to be. The art is good but that's about it.

You people think it's good because you have a child-like view of the world, especially you in particular. It's the "natives good others bad" mentality only fit for teenagers like you. Not for thinking adults like me.

>>88933166
/co/ still sucks at recommending cartoons and cartoon episodes though, right?

>>88933097
Mark Kermode is good.

>>88933217
>Not for thinking adults like me.
kek

>>88932990
It's hitting notes tons of others hit by oversimplifying the issue.

Also:
>PTSD not being explored in other comics
You must be VERY new to comics.

>>88933235
I doubt it.

>>88933239
Sorry I was mirroring your baby language. I guess you didn't follow that.
>>88933223
Yes.

>>88933217
>thinking adults like me
>he said while posting on a taiwanese porn image board
Here's a (You) for your effort.

>>88933269
>merely pretending

>>88933280
18+ kiddo.

>>88933036
Yo, check some archive, all the issues were storytimed here.

Actually here, found a link
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/87182970/#87207386

i do think it's a little bit overrated desu, but it's enjoyable

>>88933217
>>88933249
The whole thrust of Flintstones as a whole is on consumerism and the erosion of human values through consumerism. Can you give me 5 other comics ongoing right now that deal with that?

I feel like your "libcucks" gives away that you're just bothered particularly by the parts of the comic that trigger you, like an issue with references to colonialism. So you see that and zoom in on it and don't really consider a deep reading of the thing in any way. You thinking adult, you.

>>88932625
It has conservative stances too, moron.

>>88933262
Listen to him shit on Transformers or Sex and The City or Pirates of Caribbean. You might not agree with his taste but his rants are hilarious.

>>88933296
All popular comics are overrated though. All of them.

>>88933249
I said of late from the big two.

>>88933301
You're just letting your delusions color what you think of me. It's massively over-liberal. Also the "give me X" logical fallacy. Good work. I see you don't do much debating. There are dozens of comics that handled PTSD and Colonialism better, not the least of which being different versions of the Punisher including MAX at times.
>>88933306
Yeah, ones it makes fun of. It's like you didn't even read it. So don't talk about it.

>>88933321
Yes, because what I want to do is read rants about garbage that doesn't even deserve the attention in the first place.

>>88933019

To be fair, people say stuff like that all the time here. This thinking is wide spread.

>>88933343
You're the one that said:
>It's hitting notes tons of others hit by oversimplifying the issue.

>>88933369
But it's irrelevant if someone is doing it at this point in time because other comics did it at some point. Comics I still read and supposedly you do as well. Even Transmetropolitan handles the very issues you mentioned better.

If you're just comparing it to the current SJW garbage from both companies, then, ha, you're right it's the best comic ever. Amazing.

>>88933343
The only time Punisher MAX touches on PTSD is the last page of The Slavers

>>88933362
You shouldn't have high standards for neckbeards on an anonymous board for taiwanese cartoons. But paid critics? Come on...

>>88931523

I'm not reading that crap.

Any review that values something based on (the current shitty idea of) social relevancy should go straight in the trash.

>>88933406
There isn't any inner mental struggle or anything, at any point, or flashbacks. Or any thoughts related to it ever. Or his reaction when gunning down all those criminals with that heavy machinegun.

Do you people want to read into things or not?

>>88933360
Nah, you should instead get triggered when someone suggests you something. Also the fact that you've never heard about Mark Kermode tells me you've never actually bothered to read or listen to any critic but you still have very strong opinions about them. Did they trample one of your favorite Capekinos anon? :^)

>>88931523
Isn't this just another review?

>>88933468
I don't like "capekino" but nice projecting. I don't like "blockbusterkino" in general, James Bond is for the plebeians. Is that person related to you or what? I don't memorize the names if fucking shit critics anon, come on... I'd rather memorize the names of bad actors or bad directors.

>>88933405
Oh man, really? Transmetropolitan isn't half as good as the Flintstones when it takes its shots. You're arguing the existence of stuff that supposedly shoots better means X isn't worth shit, and you mention Transmetropolitan which is basically the weak piss of Hunter S. Thompson and whose high points are always its high concept single issues. Each issue of the Flintstones is like one of the best issues of Transmet.

I didn't ask you for PTSD or colonialism either. The Flintstones is the most relentless (fictional) comic I have read in its criticism of consumerism; I haven't personally read anything like it. The angle of dialing back to the supposed cradle of human civilization and looking at our civilization from there also appeals to me. And all of this gets rooted in a very tight, loving, foundational family relationship. What else is there like that out there? Transmet doesn't do that. The Punisher doesn't so that. You said there were tons of others. What are they? You've thrown out the current question, but even on that latter point there is almost nothing current doing that.

>>88932016
well yeah I mean at the end of the day it's still a DC comic

>>88933550
It's alright anon, I understand you like to have strong opinions about things you're uninformed about. No need to be so defensive.

>>88933624
Well said my little Disneyfriend.

>>88933643
Damn you salty.

>>88933552
>Each issue of the Flintstones is like one of the best issues of Transmet.

I have no empirical points on this one. You're clearly delusional and that's that, there is no more point in arguing with someone as uninformed and just, well, flat-out wrong as you are. You're taking lies as facts.

File: ignore Disney shills.jpg (13KB, 212x308px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 212x308px

>>88933624
*tips

>>88933700
>I have to reassure myself you're wrong because of ~reasons~ rather than answer your questions
OK dude. Have a nice life.

>>88933700
Ellisfags, ladies and gentlemen.

>>88933661
>>88933709
Top 20 of the year is dominated by Marvel. #1 is Marvel. Marvel also keeps winning in terms of sales. Time to deal with it, friends.

>>88933700
This isn't even interesting anymore, at least give us bunch of superficial reasons with one or two libcucks thrown in the mix you lazy fucking faggot.

>>88932625
It has beefy men AND thick chicks.

It's literally a perfect read for everyone.

>>88933770
>Marvel is selling more, that means you're not allowed to read anything else
3/10 bait at best, friend.

File: rebbit.jpg (50KB, 557x711px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 557x711px

>>88933217
Jesus Christ, dude.

>>88933984
>ignoring the rest
Nice try.

>>88934012
>meme of an overweight atheist.
The cry of the small child.

>>88933801
You're the one throwing out statements with no support other than "Muh opinions". So here is my response to that; your taste and lack of brain cells are both shit.

>>88933908
Why not just look at porn? There isn't a shortage of that. And yeah, the art style is very good. It's part of what makes it average instead of complete shit.

>>88933036
If it were a grimdark reimagining, Dino would be chained to a tree in the backyard and beaten with a stick, not joining in the family portrait.

>>88933700
Transmet and Ellis's work in general isn't very good anon

>>88934087
>lack of brain cells are both shit
Sure my triggered ESL friend. Now back to /pol/.

>>88933984
More like Marvel's giving away more

>>88934163
I have no idea what to say to you about that other than you're flat-out wrong. From sales numbers (for indie comics I'll admit), critics, and even down to individual fans this is just a lie. To be fair though, I expected this. /co/ from the very start never had any taste in comics. And I've been here from the start.

>>88934170
>not being far-left is being pol
lol

>>88934206
Make an actual argument as opposed "it's good because it's good."

CBR had the same reaction to Spurrier's X-Men Legacy. They were some of its harshest critics early on, only to reel around and do a retrospective praising it when it ended and had a good buzz about it

>>88934232
You first. All your statements on the Flintstones comic being great were invalidated and you chose to ignore that completely. You first.

>>88934206
>muh sales
>critics in a thread about how critics are shit

>>88934163
I think some issues of Transmet are brilliant: the unfreezing issue, the child prostitution issue, the reservations issue. But the whole final arc of the comic is weak and I don't think it's as consistently good as even the 7 issues of Flintstones we've had so far. Transmet is best and most original when it has an idea to really dig into, and each issue of the Flintstones has that kind of unpicking of the idea. I thought Russell's revival of Prez was in some ways better than Transmet too. A lot more heart to it.

>>88934206
ESL-kun stop getting so defensive.

>>88934247
You're talking to more than one person.

>>88934232
Oh also, God forbid I think the Flintstones re-imagining is average instead of amazing. How terrible. Here is another one for you: It's about as great as Irredeemable to Superman.

>>88934283
At least I'm not samefagging like some of you.

>>88932459
Wasn't there a writer saying that whenever they made a comic like Hanna-Barbera titles following the cartoon's styles no one gave a shit and that's why they're writing in this way now?

>>88934285
>that spoiler
I can tell you are a well-read very intelligent and classy gent ;^)

>>88931577
> people arent entitled to their own opinions

>>88932459
Actual criticism with factual reasoning is mocked and ignored. IE this thread. You guys get what you deserve.

>>88934312
Damn you got me. BTFO

File: CuMC9HkWgAAvAQU.jpg (69KB, 953x778px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 953x778px

>>88933700

>getting disgruntled because someone said that the Flinstones comic is better than Transmet

>>88934247
I haven't posted in this thread before that post. I just see you posting shit over and over again without backing any of it up.

>>88932923
I also recall some CBR goon giving that issue a bad review because the character that died was black

File: cuckrussell.jpg (34KB, 633x326px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 633x326px

I really like this writer. Any other anti-Drumpf works by him I can read?

>>88934380
I backed it up at the start. People said there wasn't any backup. That doesn't mean there wasn't, it just means you're too stupid to understand it.

>>88934285
I don't even understand what you're saying with that spoiler

And regardless of what comparison you're trying to draw, comparing a limited run with a defined ending to an 80 year old character written by hundreds of people is building a house on sand

>>88934163
Ellis is fat, has a beard and unironically wears fedoras. The man thinks that having the main character say "Suck my big cock" makes his stuff
1) mature (he said cock)
2) funny (hehe he said cock)
3) makes the character cool(he has a big cock because he said so and guys with big cocks are cool)

>>88934378
Wasn't, just amazed at how delusional you people are. I'm not even upset. That seems to be projection from you kids. Can't say I'm sorry that I rustled you though.

>>88934397
Prez

>>88934419
It just went over your head. Sucks.

>>88934299
They do two Scooby titles currently aside from apocalypse which are very much in tone with cartoons (and actually quite brilliant) and nobody buys them. So when people lost shit about Apocalypse, writers and editors pointed out that those things that everybody wants and nobody actually buys also exist. I'm pretty sure Jeff Parker was one of them.
On a semi related note, Scooby Doo Team Up and Batman 66 are actually really good if anybody here reads them. Allred actually drew some of Batman 66 issues too.

>>88934436
What did? I'm talking about Ellis in general, you illiterate monkey.

>>88934427
Yeh. I really liked it. Just like /co/mblr said I would! #NotMyPresident

>>88934448
Apocalypse is really bad though. As someone who read it. Formulaic and it rips off dozens of better stories.

>>88934461
Ironic shitposting is still shitposting

>>88934460
Judging someone's work on how they look is something 10-year-olds do.

>>88934485
Not that guy, but he's still right. Most of you post that you love X comic because it promotes your tumblr ideas.

>>88934461
>>88934523
Samefag

>>88934502
I didn't judge his works on how he looks, my illiterate friend. Read my post again because the first part does not mention the quality if his works. It is an accurate statement. And if you like to reply to posts on 4chan with lefedoraman.jpg(and let's be honest here, you do) then you should seriously stop since your god is also a fedoraman.

>>88934523
I liked it because I found it funny and the art was good

>>88934545
Actually incorrect. But you would see that if you knew how to count IPs. Or you know, use any of the 4chan tools.

And in case you're wondering, yes half the posts pissing people off are mine. But there are at least two other people here pissing you off as well.

>guy ranting about how the flintstones is bad turns out to be autistic trump supporter
what a surprise

you won, get over it

So what they're saying is the Flinstones comic is #Woke?

>>88934608
I love how triggered you all are that you don't even read my posts. I didn't even say it was bad. Just that it was average. You see one statement for liberals. The other anons trolling in this thread are right, /co/ is tumblr now. Thanks for clearing that up for me.

>>88934579
>if you knew how to count IPs.
I can mobilepost as well ESL-kun.
Also

Stop

Posting

Like

A

Retarded

Redditor.

>>88934630
yeh it's anti-Drumpf so naturally

anti-white male hegemony

praise PoC

>>88934645
/co/ is Tumblr because /pol/ and /pol-lite/ invaded and 4chan is inherently contrarian

>>88934608
He is a fucking ESL so I don't even know why he's so happy and spouting out /pol/ memes.

desu it was pretty weird seeing all the initial hate given that progressives usually love nothing more than other progressives co-opting works created by non-progs.

>>88934658
Only I didn't. You just can't accept the fact that this isn't just one person samefagging in the thread.
As for posting like a redditor:
You
Literally
Did
That
As
You
Told
Me
Not
To.

Putting words down like that is pure Reddit, Redditfriend. You're either a bad troll or have no self awareness whatsoever.

>>88934630
Mark Waid btfo

>>88934677
Only that's bullshit. /co/ was always heavily tumblr and SJW from the start. It just got worse recently.

>>88934698
>being so bad at English that you think someone with a greater mastery of the language is ESL
lol

File: 1483198678796.gif (679KB, 334x200px) Image search: [Google]

679KB, 334x200px

>>88934677
/co/ is filled with fanfic-writing literal homosexuals

that's not an anti-/pol/ thing

it's just that latent fanfic-writing homosexuals found /co/ to be the most normie board they could colonise so we end up having to deal with all this gay shit

>>88931523
Doesn't matter, the damage has been done.

>>88934707
>Only I didn't.
Cmon, it doesn't even take that long to screencap or Photoshop unless you're a filthy mobileposter.
>You're either a bad troll or have no self awareness whatsoever.
Hey, at least I'm not samefagging with two line breaks in each post.

>>88933173
You sounded like a prick when you asked that question

>>88934698
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

>>88934759
>lol
How new?

>>88934707
>YLDTAYTMNT
That's not very catchy

>>88934790
Shut up /co/mblr.

>>88934782
I'm not samefagging though. I'm not sure why you're so obsessed with it. That or you don't understand what samefagging is.

Also >TFW someone is so inept at writing that they can't copy another style.

File: 130810_01_zps197a0ff5.png (284KB, 350x467px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 350x467px

>>88934448
Kinda related, but it's funny because there's tons of fanworks about AUs and reimaginations, especially Scooby Doo, and most of them are really praised.
Unsurprinsingly, there's a lot of grtty and edgy stuff and impossibly handsome supermodel designs.

>>88931523
I missed when Flintstones threads were about how good the comic was and not wall-to-wall shitposting

>>88934848
This thread is just autists going at each other, sadly they will also flock to any new thread.

>>88934812
Your English is terrible by the way. The phrase is "How new are you to the English language?" which is also incorrect. What you mean to say is "How long have you been learning English?". We'll get your ESL classes done in no time lil' buddy.

>>88934837
>can't even green text properly
You have to go back.

>>88934820
I could see yeoldtaylorswiftteenagemutantninjaturtles catching on

>>88934848
Well next time the autists like you should be able to handle an opinion that the comic is not perfect. It's good but not great or amazing. Then your thread will go better.

>>88934864
>doesn't know 4chan meme
>doesn't know the meaning of ESL
How new?

>>88934899
It's pretty great, you just have shit taste

>>88934899
No. There must be an echo chamber in every thread.

>>88934919
Nope, that's you.

>>88934848
Report the ESL autist samefagging then.

>>88934826
Really? that's best insult you can come up with?

>>88934914
The other meaning doesn't apply. I'm not alt right. I've been here since this board didn't exist btw. You're the newfags
.>>88934934
/co/ in a nutshell. If you don't think SU, etc are perfect you are an alt-right troll

>>88934947
I've told you I'm not samefagging. You would have to ban four people at least to stop what you call shitposting. The mod can see that even if you can't.

>>88934942
>literally no u
ha ha oh wow

>>88932672
They thought it was disrespectfully shitting on a character for no reason not realizing that the disrespect is part of the joke and that gallows humor is a thing.

>>88934987
The intellectual dissonance you people have. I'm both an oldfag using tired memes and completely new. Come on.

>>88933019
God I wish Bemis was the one writing Generation X.

File: 1481881114219.jpg (57KB, 810x422px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 810x422px

>>88932902
>At least movie critics are usually people educated in films and with enough intelligence to get hired by a newspaper.

yeh

>>88935017
No u is timeless, newfag

>>88935049
It was old and busted eight years ago. You'd know that if you weren't new.

>>88935023
I feel like the person they've gone it is definitely better than Bendis, Hopeless, etc? Unless I'm misremembering.

>>88935023
That Crossed issue was garbage and I don't want him touching my waifu.

>>88933683
Considering you went apeshit after someone recommended you a critic, I feel you're far saltier.

>>88932595
Search "flinstones" because the idiot who storytimed it couldn't spell.

>>88931523
I will never understand why /co/ has been absolutely gushing over this series. I find it mildly entertaining but the whole "OMG, this Flintstones comic is so deep!" shit needs to stop. It's baby's first existentialism haphazardly sprinkled around the so called "biting social commentary" bullshit. Some of the jokes made me smirk, but any of the "deep" stuff is just a bore to read through.

>>88935270
Indeed. It's average. It's a fun read. It's not terrible. It's not great.

In b4 someone claims samefag here. Do I have four cellphones and one PC guys? And I'm using them all? Come on.

>>88933036
You lost when you started complaining about a reimaginings.

>>88933040
That review didn't even know who was writing that arc.

>>88935144
I didn't go apeshit, you're the one who lost his shit when I said that I didn't give a shit about some guy's autistic rants on bad movies.

>>88934771
Honestly, I'm a literal faggot and even I'm baffled by /co/.
Like the gay threads for example, they literally just post the same old images over and over again and talk about gay fanfiction.
I don't know how they keep doing it, because to me that just seems boring as shit, and would lose any charm by the third thread.
Is this normal on here?
Is it just a homo version of waifu threads?

>>88935376
>Is it just a homo version of waifu threads?
Is that even a real question

>>88935291
Exactly. Hell, I even find a lot of the jokes funny. I just don't get why shit like that marriage speech from Fred is the type of shit that gets reposted the most.

>critics start to like thing
>4chan turns against it
classic

>>88935497
>Claiming something is not the best comic ever even though you still like it is rabidly hating it.

Okay bud.

>>88932625
Trumptards confirmed for having absolutely deplorable taste in comic books.

>>88935636
The thread is dead troll. Those were some nice posts you did to stir things up on the other side though.

>>88931523
I am not supportive of printed comics attempting to reveal the paradoxical nature of civilized societies, especially how uncivilized it really is beneath the veneer of being moral, just, and supportive of human rights. When in reality, many countries that claim to be the leaders of the free world, such the US or the members of the EU, are the ones partially responsible for bringing so much violence into this world, and in many cases actually lower the quality of life of those they were claiming to protect.

>>88931560
What did kc green say?

>>88935031
>Rebels
>Democrats claim to be the Rebels
Nigga, both the Democrats and Republicans are for the bombing of civilians in the Middle East. If anything, both parties are part of the Sith Order, fighting each other out due to the Rule of Two. There are no Jedi stop to them.

>>88934206
>/co/ from the very start never had any taste in comics.
>And I've been here from the start.
What did he mean by this?

>>88931560
>NOT MUH FLINTSTONES
But MUH FLINTSTONES were absolute shit..

>>88936262
Yes, prog, we know your kind have an aversion to traditional values like a vampire to sunlight, garlic, or running water.

File: 1474165855739.jpg (132KB, 938x456px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 938x456px

>>88931523
>tfw never liked the Flintstones growing up
>tfw don't care about the current Flintstones comic
Shill it to me people, why is it good and why should I give it money when I don't like any of the characters presented?

File: Low Quality Bait.jpg (16KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 600x600px

>88936408
Because you are obviously a giant wanker who needs a new toy to shove up your urethra?

>>88936408
It's funny and pretty much nothing like the original series outside of the premise of a modern Stone Age family

>>88936408
I enjoy it for the dark humor and occasionally clever puns.

File: 1371016640828.png (416KB, 623x527px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 623x527px

>>88935031

>We rebels fight the Empire of Trump

Oh yeah, what's this pampered shit head going to do? Post mean things on the internet?

>>88936165

Have you not noticed how Childish the electoral races have become? Everybody sees it as "good vs evil" no matter what side they're on now. it's disturbing

File: 1409703640787.jpg (27KB, 290x324px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 290x324px

>>88931523
>caring about what paid shills write one way or the other

>>88935270
Agreed. Just go look at some of the story times for it, and all the embarrassing "Damn, so deep!" replies very basic observations on life get. Sometimes I forget this website is mostly pimply faced teens and manchildren with the same mental maturity. Still, a very solid comedy series that usually makes me chuckle a couple of times throughout a single issue.

File: 1376843999554.jpg (59KB, 256x231px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 256x231px

>>88933036
>grim-dark
That word has lost all it's meaning.

File: mothsfnstn.jpg (495KB, 1398x464px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1398x464px

>>88936408
It's simply an amusing take on an old cartoon.

>>88931560
I'm usually a pretty NOT MUH kinda guy, but Flintstones actually is MUH. It's just been updated to make them once again be a modern stone age family. It's like when people complained about Flintstones on the Rocks, when it was probably the most true to original thing they had did since the early seasons of the show.

Now that Scooby Apocalypse, that's definitely NOT MUH.

I'm consistently surprised that /co/ likes this book as much as they do. It's leftist as fuck and Mark Russel is probably the most lefty writer in mainstream comics.

Not that I'm complaining of course.

>>88940536
>surprised that /co/mblr would like a /co/mblr book
It's not a cape book, so /col/ doesn't care all that much.

>>88931523
>most-socially-relevant
A low selling book most people haven't heard of is the definition of irrelevant.