[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Oh boy, a new animated Grinch, sweet. Thank god it's not

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 191
Thread images: 33

File: IMG_9517.jpg (41KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_9517.jpg
41KB, 640x640px
Oh boy, a new animated Grinch, sweet. Thank god it's not being made by--

>Illumination Entertainment
GOD
F U C K I N G

DAMN IT
>>
The live action movie was an abomination that Jim Carrey managed to salvage to some extent if only for when the Grinch was on screen.
>>
Is there ANY reason to make a new Grinch? The original cartoon fall off the Earth or something?
>>
>>88859460

Illumination can do it what's the problem?

Or are you going to pretend the only thing they made was Minions and SING?
>>
>>88860404
>implying the live action movie wasn't a fucking masterpiece

Everyone secretly loves that movie.
>>
>>88860617
They also made The Lorax, which was a shit fest. Watch them put a character in this movie that acts like a minion, again
>>
>>88860617
These people are literal fucking whos in the animation industry it was only until minions blew up in "ironic" popularity ala Shrek did they start to be more known

Dont doubt normalfags will stop calling them Pixar though
>>
>>88859460

Horton hears a who was a good movie
>>
>>88860834
Illumination didn't make that movie
>>
>>88860450
Its not full-length, so rereleasing it to theaters is less profitable.
>>
>>88859460
Illumination has literally never made a bad movie.
>>
>>88860404

The live action film was fine. Not perfect, but fine.

Everythung Illumination shits out is a horror.
>>
>>88860806

Oh boy, I wonder what product placement they'll use this time!
>>
>>88860811
Despicable Me was their first movie. So obviously they did pretty damn well with the whole Minions thing.
>>
>>88860806
Seeing how The Grinch is about the Materialization of Christmas. I can't wait for Illumination to put their hypocrisy on full display by selling out big time just like what they did with The Lorax.

Remember this shit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAoiBCCb6cE
>>
>>88860697
Watching that movie is the only Christmas tradition my family gives a shit about. It's fantastic.
>>
>>88859460
But is Jim Carrey voicing The Grinch?
This is important.
>>
>>88859460
So is it Grinch Stole Christmas or Grinch Night?
>>
>>88860404
The life action is so bad, it's good.
>>
>>88860404
>Jim Carrey managed to salvage to some extent

Jim Carrey was a massive part of the fucking problem. His whole schtick is completely the wrong fit for who and what the Grinch fucking is.
>>
>>88861588
I loved Carrey's Grinch. Just think of him as a NEET basement-dweller.
>>
>>88861588
I thought he was funny as fuck.

>If you utter so much as one syllable I'LL HUNT YOU DOWN AND GUT YOU LIKE A FISH...if you'd like to fax me, press the star key!
>>
So is their a Dr. Suess animated cinematic universe I dont know about?
>>
File: Hop.jpg (243KB, 1012x1500px) Image search: [Google]
Hop.jpg
243KB, 1012x1500px
>>88860901
>Illumination has literally never made a bad movie.
>>
>>88862088
__ _____ __ ____ ___ _____
>>
>>88859460
>lorax 2.0 is coming
G R E A T
O
O
D
>>
>>88859460
O, boy, can't wait for another bland kiddie-shit cartoon!
>>
>>88859460
At least they can't completely fuck up the message of this one. Can they?
>>
>>88862341

Depends. The biggest problem with the Carrey-Grinch was that they fleshed him too much as a character by making his hatred clear. The whole point of the Grinch is that his hatred ranged from silly grievances to maybe something more personal. Nope, he got laughed at and decided to hate the holiday when it really didn't anything to him directly.

But knowing these guys, they'll probably just make it that the Whos are just as out of touch with the meaning of the holiday as the Grinch, but on the opposite end of the misunderstanding spectrum and it'll be up to Cindy Lou Hoo (now probably a booksmart tween with a 30-odd year old woman's voice) to show both sides how they're wrong.
>>
>>88862712
>30-odd year old woman's voice
But isn't Tara Strong in her 40's?
>>
>>88862883
>He thinks Hollywood will hire actual voice actors.
It's going to be a comedian who's never done voiceover in her life.
>>
>>88862991

It could happen, but the odds of an all-celebrity cast are certainly higher than a few big names and the rest being VA staples.

Even then, Tara's talent wouldn't save a disastrous rewrite of the plot.
>>
File: 1481351459263.png (50KB, 423x485px) Image search: [Google]
1481351459263.png
50KB, 423x485px
How do we stop this madness?
>>
>>88862991
Amy Schumer.
>>
EEGS
>>
>>88862712
>>88862883
>>88862991
It'd probably be a fucking disaster, and it probably won't happen, but I could see them getting Kate Micucci to voice Cindy and it being adorable as fuck.

You know if they did though they'd also write her character to go around playing the ukulele for no reason, too, though.
>>
File: 1453558251066.png (85KB, 186x197px) Image search: [Google]
1453558251066.png
85KB, 186x197px
>>88861066
Apparently that car isn't even very enviro-friendly
>>
>>88861066

The Ron Howard one already kind of did that, though. They made the Whos act like materialistic cunts at times. Cindy's mom and that single chick are always trying to outdo each other, the mayor makes a fuss over the gifts, they really missed the point sometimes.

Worse this can do is overadvertising it, but probably not much else if they make the Whos more or less the same instead of the cheerful folk who just love the spirit of giving and togetherness.
>>
>>88859460

Hey, at least they're not making a Cat in the Hat movie too.

>They're making a Cat in the Hat movie too.

FUCKSTICKS.

>>88860617
They also made Hop. Remember Hop?

Of course you don't. More people remember a Sinbad genie movie from the 90s called Shazam than remember Hop without using a wikipedia page, and Sinbad never made that movie.

Most of them are confusing him for Shaq, who actually did make a genie movie in the 90s with a near-identical title, but all those people think they all came into our world from a parallel dimension now because fuck the most logical and straightforward explanation amirite

>>88860834

That was Blue Sky.

>>88860901
Well, shit, here's proof those people with the Sinbad movie might be onto something because fuck knows what dimension this Anon is from. Sure ain't this one

>>88862341
Wanna bet?
>>
But will it be Grinch focused or will we have another Cindy singing about puberty and a arc about commercialisation of the holidays thst seems to drift off.
>>
>>88864190
Hop that movie with Hoff and the guy that wanted to become the Easter Bunny.

Strange film. Pink Berets were hot though
>>
>>88864190

Plenty of people remember Hop because it had Russell Brand in it.

>>88864256

When did she sing about puberty? She just sang a weird song about Christmas was some kind of entity and not just a holiday.

Odds are it'll be a 50/50 split with the Grinch being there, but getting Cindy as a tagalong AGAIN because god forbid these movies star only the title character.
>>
>>88862712
>But knowing these guys, they'll probably just make it that the Whos are just as out of touch with the meaning of the holiday as the Grinch, but on the opposite end of the misunderstanding spectrum and it'll be up to Cindy Lou Hoo (now probably a booksmart tween with a 30-odd year old woman's voice) to show both sides how they're wrong.

So Carrey Grinch again.
>>
>>88864587

Cindy was actually played by a kid in that. And she didn't really do much beyond be additional motivation for the Grinch to save the presents. Also, not all of the Whos were out of touch with the holiday's real meaning in the Howard-Carrey film, the movie just didn't care to flesh them out beyond "They really love Christmas, lol!"
>>
i trust that cumberbatch will do his best to bring a little dignity to the character
and by that i mean play him like the grumpy scrooge that he is in the story, not the schizoid clow that carrey portrayed him as
>>
>>88864823

>Whoville, I've come to bargain!
>>
>>88864009
Yeah, they argued over materialistic things UNTIL THEY REMEMBER THE TRUE SPIRIT OF THE HOLIDAYS and put that shit aside.
Did you only watch half the movie?
>>
>>88864941

I said not all of them, fucking read. It was made clear that not every Who was a materialistic asshat.
>>
>>88860697
Wrong!
>>
>>88863759
>but I could see them getting Kate Micucci to voice Cindy and it being adorable as fuck.

oh shit that'd be nice.

personally i'd get a child actress but Kate would be good for an adult VA. To be fair Cindy Lou in the original was voiced by June Foray so an adult isn't a stretch.
>>
>>88865162

Still better than the other Dr. Seuss adaptions made.
>>
>>88862330

If we're lucky, maybe we'll get another really good (albeit removed from the actual film) villain song.
>>
>>88862330
I can't wait for the next onceler
>>
>>88866009

>Grinch's family are the reason he hates Christmas, they hated all Holidays because of arbitrary reasons
>Cindy has to teach the Grinch that Christmas is fun and makes you feel nice
>>
>Grinch movie

f o r

w h a t

p u r p o s e

God, since when have animating studios gone so creatively bankrupt?

I mean, there's still some measly stand out movies, but jesus. The mere fact that a Emoji movie is going to come out just shows how thirsty they are for bloody material just to milk it further and beyond. Movies barely even try to break the mold.
>>
>>88866963

Because not everyone liked the Ron Howard movie and want something more faithful.

Problem is, this probably isn't going to be all that much more faithful beyond possibly having a Grinch who isn't acting like he escaped a mental ward while the people of Whoville are still forgetting what Christmas means for 90% of the plot.
>>
>>88866963
...Oh shit. Soon they'll be so devoid of ideas they might make a Reddit movie. Or god forbid, 9gag.

Or worse yet, US.

May god have mercy on us all.

Pretty sure someone has already made the /aco/ movie
>>
File: FUGKC.gif (799KB, 200x189px) Image search: [Google]
FUGKC.gif
799KB, 200x189px
>>88867138
>Coming Summer 2025
>The 4chan Movie!
>>
>>88859460
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2709692/
>Benedict Cumberbatch
why am i not surprised
>>
>>88867138
>the /aco/ movie

Which would be?...
>>
>>88864941
Yeah but that's changing a fairly major point of the original story and animated short. The Whos don't care when Grinch 'steals' Christmas because they've always known what the true spirit of Christmas is, which makes the Grinch reconsider his hate for the holiday.

In the movie, the Whos are materialistic and mean-spirited up until the ending, they've given Grinch a reason to hate them.
>>
>Dr. Seuss absolutely forbade his estate from letting Disney make any films of his work.
>Disney would treat his source material with ten times the respect every other studio has given it

Really stirs the ol' smart puddin.
>>
>>88867473

Most of them are materialistic, others just treat it as some kind of competition like Cindy's mother and the shoehorned love-interest for the Grinch who take the festive spirit too far with their war game shit. Still, they showed that plenty just enjoyed holiday for good reasons, like the poorly added and quickly dropped step-moms of the Grinch who don't even come back to rejoice at their adoptive son returning to the town.
>>
>>88867564

That's hard to say. Disney hasn't exactly been known for being 100% faithful to the source materials of their works (just look at all of the fairy tale-based films). Still, they probably wouldn't have deviated as much, but probably still had some things like poor musical choices, celebrity voices, and stretching out the plots beyond the necessary time limit.
>>
File: requests.jpg (313KB, 845x1013px) Image search: [Google]
requests.jpg
313KB, 845x1013px
>>88867138
This place has made comics and a characters out of something as obscure as board culture. Anything can be fitted into a narrative and given a character with enough will.
>>
>>88867673
There'd be celebrity voices, yeah, but Disney USUALLY casts celebrities because they can portray the character well. We're a bit beyond the days of the shoe-horned Genie analogue voiced by a B-List comedian.

We'd still get a lame pop number somewhere, but it probably wouldn't be as intrusive as all the characters singing an REO Speedwagon song.
>>
>>88867721

>Meme Wars
>Not too subtle jab at Star Wars that turns every Meme-spewing site into warring worlds
>4chan is treated like the Galactic empire, making the bias obvious about which site is despised the most
>Throw in a ton of tough, one-note female characters to pander to tumblr's SJWs crowd
>Sprinkle it with the latest tween singer sensation and other chart-topper bands
>Hype it like it'll have a sequel

Breaks even, but the sequel talks are on hiatus.
>>
>>88859460
>The Grinch is a bad guy
>He's bad because something bad happened to him. Awww........;_;
>does something nice, now he's good yaaaay #i luv the grinch
>>
>>88860404
>>88860697
I have no fucking clue why I like this movie so much
>Over complicated plot
>Bizarre Sexuality
>Ugly Character designs
And yet I really like it, look forward to watching it every year. Must have some charm beyond just nostalgia.
>>
File: Goose.jpg (17KB, 333x347px) Image search: [Google]
Goose.jpg
17KB, 333x347px
>>88861066
>They literally show stuff like this in the villain song of their movie
>>
>>88867776
>as all the characters singing an REO Speedwagon song.

Where did this happen?

And I don't know, sometimes you can get a decent celeb portrayal, but others just are just "Oh, it's X playing X in a Y costume". More often, they get the big names because it helps to sell the film for adults while the kids won't give two fucks if an accordion filled with jizz was providing the voice for someone.

Really though, it all boils down to who directs it, and if Disney step in to grab the reigns more than what is necessary.
>>
>>88867887
>Where did this happen?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rZNGiXDWsE
>>
>>88859460
Re watching Chuck Jones original short really reminded me how strong it was as a feature. Narration, story and animation were excellent and it managed to say more in its 20 minutes than the live action version did in an hour and a half.
The story of how it got made is even heartwarming. Dr. Seuss basically only let Chuck do it because they were old army buddies.
>>
>>88867858

Never seemed that complicated, though it was certainly full of plot holes.

>Narrator states that nobody knew where the Grinch was from or why he hates Christmas
>We see him as a fucking baby and how he had a bad Christmas once as a kid

Can't deny that the sexual nature was awkward as hell sometimes. Much as I can appreciate a boob or ass joke, the whole love interest bit was just weak, and things like the dog's ass getting kissed was an insult to Tambor's career.

Grinch was pretty good design-wise, and some of the Whos looked alright enough. Then you had others who looked like the mutating hags from The Witches before they turned into rats.
>>
>>88867966

Huh, never did see that one. Didn't they throw in some Bully-type villain as well?
>>
>>88868098
They basically expanded the three antagonists in the book (Kangaroo, Wickersham, and Vlad Vladikoff) and gave the mayor a doubting city council.
>>
>>88868045
I really don't think it needs much more of a plot than "See those Who's who like Christmas so much? Well fuck'em" As Dr. Doof taught us petty evil is the best evil.
>>
>>88868045
>Can't deny that the sexual nature was awkward as hell sometimes
What is up with these Seuss adaptations having odd sexual jokes? It offends in some way.
>>
>>88861948
Grinch vs Cat in the hat on the Butter Battle Book when?
>>
>>88868187
Me*
>>
>>88868140

Eh, you can have a complicated reason for the villain, the problem was that the movie practically made the Grinch justified in a lot of ways. Nearly all of the Whos were just in it for the gifts and nothing else, alternatively some just for the festive displays, and making it that some hated the Grinch before he became a grouch because he looked different.
>>
>>88868187

Kids can't laugh at clean humor. God forbid they're shown not every joke has to be butts and farts.
>>
>>88867564
He would be rolling in his fucking grave. The only reason he forbade Disney was because he didn't want his stories to be butchered by some big company in order to sell merchandise and mindless products. And look at it now.
>>
>>88860806

Money's on Max the dog.
>>
>>88868437

Could be since the Howard film made him more of an unwilling pawn.

Still, I'm betting on Cindy Lou being turned into some gung-ho spunky girl who takes the charge in changing the Grinch's attitude.

Probably is the laughing stock who happens to like a boy that joins in teasing her but will totally fall for her because she turned the big, bad Grinch into a softie
>>
>>88862088
DAMN, was this movie boring. Even Cammy-bunnies couldn't save it.
>>
>>88868098
They made the kangaroo hot. Good movie. Without her? Shit movie.
>>
>>88868045
Yeah, boy, some of those Who gals looked pretty fuckin hot. Muzzles and mouse noses do wonders for some women.
>>
>>88860903
I like the Despicable Me movies
>>
File: Sablewhy.jpg (7KB, 250x236px) Image search: [Google]
Sablewhy.jpg
7KB, 250x236px
>>88868198
When are we getting a butter battle movie? That's the one Suess book I'd actually like to be seen made into a movie and yet they're going back to shit they've already tried.
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (116KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault.jpg
116KB, 1920x1080px
>>88860404
>>88859460
You know, the live-action adaptation was far from perfect and it would still make Seuss roll in his grave. There's a layer of butter on top of the camera at all times, some of the jokes are crude and "family-unfriendly", the plot is needlessly complicated and does not align with the book at many parts...

But at least the message was there.

Illumination Entertainment's 'The Lorax' completely misses the mark. Sure, it's much child friendly and has overall cleaner and arguable netter visuals, but the message is completely subverted by the corporate interests for profit.

>>88866884
How lowly and blind are you when you put the protagonist of a story with an environmental message on a fucking car commercial. It's not even hybrid, much less electrical.
>>
>announce making a new Grinch
>JUST as Christmas ends
What the fuck
>>
>>88867167
>starring Michael Cera as Moot and Scarlett Johansson as Hiroyuki
>>
>>88868854

>Surprise, it's a Romeo and Juliet-esque affair about a boy and girl who are separated by the wall and just want to love each other while the adults squabble over the right way to butter toast
>Oh, and the whole allegory about arms races is just made into a silly misunderstanding between the people
>And the movie has a fakeout where the adults are about to start another conflict over something silly (like the way to face toilet paper) before cutting back to show them laugh off and rolling the credits to a wannabe They Might Be Giants song
>>
>>88868950
knowing illumination, they'll probably churn it out in time for christmas 2017
>>
File: 1427751667925.jpg (24KB, 284x253px) Image search: [Google]
1427751667925.jpg
24KB, 284x253px
>>88869062
>All of that

Let me dream it might be good, anon.
>>
>>88868942
>some of the jokes are crude and "family-unfriendly"
You're the same kind of person who posts a joke only adults would get and say "HOW DID THIS GET PAST THE CENSORS"?
>>
>>88869062
>>And the movie has a fakeout where the adults are about to start another conflict over something silly (like the way to face toilet paper) before cutting back to show them laugh off and rolling the credits to a wannabe They Might Be Giants song
yes, because we can all agree on the correct way to face toilet paper
...right, /co/??
>>
>>88869279
No, I'm just questioning why would a man kissing a dog's anus be necessary in a Dr. Seuss movie about the meaning of Christmas.

Oh.

That's the true meaning of Christmas, isn't it?
I've been doing this wrong the whole time.
>>
>>88869301

Facing away from the wall, yes.
>>
>>88869266

>Green Eggs & Ham movie
>John Goodman and Shia Labeouf as the unnamed man and Sam-I-Am respectively
>They're brother-in-laws, with Sam's sister having just married Goodman's
>They're on a roadtrip/honeymoon
>Sam-I-Am tries to get Goodman's character to eat green eggs and ham every truck stop they come to
>There's a subplot about a diamond theft
>>
File: Worsethanbirth.png (177KB, 312x230px) Image search: [Google]
Worsethanbirth.png
177KB, 312x230px
>>88869560
All things considered, I'm quite surprised they haven't tried doing a Green Eggs movie considering how popular it is.

I shudder to think of what the obligatory tie in IHOP breakfast would do to one's stomach.
>>
>>88870063

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Eggs_and_Ham_(TV_series)

I was just fucking joking about the road trip stuff on every instance. WHO FUCKING READ MY POSTS?
>>
File: 1480810723598.gif (2MB, 244x244px) Image search: [Google]
1480810723598.gif
2MB, 244x244px
>Illumination Studios

Gagh!! Why the fuck are these people in charge of animating Seuss's work??
>>
>>88859460
GREEN

EYES
>>
>>88871585

Ha, first you kill your own daughter and your replacement one explodes!
>>
>>88870063

Pretty sure there's food dyes that are safe to eat.

Probably wouldn't look that appetizing, though.
>>
>>88862330
LET IT DIE LET IT DIE
>>
>>88871627
THE GRINCH'S ARMS ARE NOT BLUE
>>
>>88868942
>the message was there.
I think that's what makes the live-action version tolerable. At heart, it's still the basic Grinch story. It's got an extended plot to pad the running length, sure, but it still hits the marks of the original story.

>>88869062
That's probably what would happen. The lead roles would be a black male and a white female, too.

>>88867983
When two men watch another man's head blown clean off by shrapnel, a life ended in the blink of an eye, you form a bond that is stronger than no other.
>>
>>88869301
Over top, away from the wall. That's common fucking sense.

Anyone doing it the other way is doing it for the sake of being contrarian.
>>
File: Untitled.jpg (30KB, 525x580px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.jpg
30KB, 525x580px
I sure cant wait for the moral to be "Christmas isn't about things, it's about family" only to see rampant tie-in holiday advertisement for toys
>>
File: 777.jpg (109KB, 720x405px) Image search: [Google]
777.jpg
109KB, 720x405px
>>88867858
the only good thing about grinch movie is watching taylor as a kid and thinking about how she was pure and innocent back then and now how she's a huge slut literally fucking her female fans on stage

Fucking love it every time I rewatch the movie
>>
>>88863753
EEEEEGGGS
>>
>>88873933
Wat
>>
>>88873816

Do the... people in the Butter Battle Book even have different skin colors?

Still, they could make the guy have a black teen voice and talk all cool, while the girl is probably nerdy and squees at shit.
>>
>>88868942
The optimist in me would like to believe that maybe Illumination will learn their lesson from Lorax's abysmal critical and audience reviews.

The pessimist in me thinks they'll look at the $350 million they raked in at the box office and say 'fuck it'.
>>
>>88873980
Not at all. The book about discrimination is "The Sneetches".

I wonder what message a "Sneetches" movie would put forth while completely forgetting about the book's original message.
>>
>>88873935

[Distorted music intensifies in Metroid likeness]
>>
I must fuck the tree fuck the tree fuck the tree fuck the tree fuck the tree fuck the tree fuck the tree
>>
File: black people.jpg (55KB, 720x702px) Image search: [Google]
black people.jpg
55KB, 720x702px
>>88873980
>Butter Battle Book movie starts with a dark-skin guy being mowed down by a light-skin guy in uniform
>>
>it's actually a sequel, many years later
>the Grinch is dismayed that the Whos are swept in commercialism and material goods
>makes it his mission to re-teach Whoville the meaning of Christmas
>oh and Cindy is an apathetic teenager because
>>
>>88860404
Carrey's performance in Grinch was fucking appalling. Every moment that manages to work in even the slightest bit of subtlety or depth is instantly interrupted by Carrey going full Ace Ventura at the drop of a fucking hat.
>>
>>88874033

wow
>>
>>88874021

It's just a highschool drama. The stars even tries to make references to Kill La Kill or something and just makes that "in school, everyone is equal"
>>
>>88874073
The child
>>
>>88874046

How does a fucking foot look like a knife?
>>
>>88859460

They needed to make another remake? Let's start a drinking game.

Chase scene? Drink!

10 second unnecessary dancing scene using disco music? Drink!

Farts? Drink twice!

>>88862298

GROOD.

>>88862330

I... actually love this movie.
>>
>>88874303
That drinking game sounds lethal.
>>
File: sneetches.jpg (167KB, 422x471px) Image search: [Google]
sneetches.jpg
167KB, 422x471px
>>88874021
Some Sneetches, it's said, have bellies with stars.
And some, I've been told, have none upon thars.
But neither is better, and neither is worse.
What's really important is to open your purse.
Spend money on backpacks, on hats, and on bags
On binders, and notebooks, and Sneetch-Approvedâ„¢ swag
Tired of your loafers? Need some new shoes?
Why not splurge on a new pair of Sneetchersâ„¢ (or two!)
Spend big! Spend hard! Spend online and at stores!
Spend till your last cent is safe in our drawers!
And if you feel cheated, by our cheap corporate shit
Just remember that nobody forced you to buy it.
>>
>>88874456
This is beautiful and I could kiss you.
>>
>>88860901
wrong
>>
>>88874456
Bravo. Read aloud.
>>
>>88873933

who
>>
>>88874456
Nice
>>
>>88867138
I would watch a dramady about moot having to deal with all the years of bullshit legal drama the site drummed up.
>>
>>88862330
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpgUQYARIsw
>you will never see this version of the movie
>you will never even read its screenplay
>>
File: 1277834430632.jpg (202KB, 404x605px) Image search: [Google]
1277834430632.jpg
202KB, 404x605px
>>88869010
>and Scarlett Johansson as Hiroyuki

KEK
>>
File: stubhub you dorks.jpg (219KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]
stubhub you dorks.jpg
219KB, 2048x1365px
>>88867138
>>88867167
>>
>>88862088
Haven't seen this movie but that rabbit looks way more realistic and less cartoony than their usual style. I guess it was an experiment before they hit the goldmine.
>>
>>88870063
>I shudder to think of what the obligatory tie in IHOP breakfast would do to one's stomach.
I remember one restaurant that did their own spin on green eggs and ham that was just dill in the eggs and jalapeno jelly on the ham.
>>
>>88864888
Welp, let it be so!
>>
>>88873933
I need more pictures like the one you posted.
>>
>>88873935
>>88874022
STINKY JEWS
>>
>>88867138
It would be about the hacker called 4chan
>>
>The live-action Grinch
>not the greatest Christmass film of all time
:'(
>>
>>88876035
oh yeah rewatched it, it was really good, and I want to fuck that big titted whos butthole.
>>
>>88876035
don't be sad, cute anon. there there. tomorrow is another day.
>>
>>88876079
>and I want to fuck that big titted whos butthole

don't we all
>>
>>88859460
>Open image
>Right eye's pupil moves from one direction to another
>>
File: 1.png (416KB, 501x1401px) Image search: [Google]
1.png
416KB, 501x1401px
>>88874021
>>
Oh boy, another shitty version they'll play on TV instead of the classic.
>>
File: 2.png (357KB, 501x1247px) Image search: [Google]
2.png
357KB, 501x1247px
>>88876421
>>
File: 3.png (600KB, 501x2714px) Image search: [Google]
3.png
600KB, 501x2714px
>>88876434
>>
File: 4.png (291KB, 501x2866px) Image search: [Google]
4.png
291KB, 501x2866px
>>88876516
>>
File: 5.png (337KB, 501x2697px) Image search: [Google]
5.png
337KB, 501x2697px
>>88876545
>>
File: tears.jpg (14KB, 236x206px) Image search: [Google]
tears.jpg
14KB, 236x206px
>>88876545
>Drake Bell

You got me

Honestly it's impressive but also painful how accurate it is
>>
File: 6.png (261KB, 501x2331px) Image search: [Google]
6.png
261KB, 501x2331px
>>88876596
>>
File: 7.png (153KB, 501x1743px) Image search: [Google]
7.png
153KB, 501x1743px
>>88876645
>>
>>88868014
>>
>>88875124
The Social Network but called The Anon Network.
>>
>>88873933
Literally, who?
>>
>>88860404
>Jim Carrey managed to salvage
By doing what, devouring the scenery until nothing was left?
>>
>>88876723

the anti-social network
>>
File: you_are_wrong.jpg (37KB, 600x480px) Image search: [Google]
you_are_wrong.jpg
37KB, 600x480px
>>88860901
In fact, the opposite is true.
>>
File: 1415248601986.jpg (24KB, 172x478px) Image search: [Google]
1415248601986.jpg
24KB, 172x478px
>>88862883
>>
>>88876684
This is awesome.
>>
>>88869301
As much we can agree on the proper term for a [spolier]bounce house.
>>
>>88877787
Auto correct hast forsaken me.
>>
>>88874068
I'd watch it maybe enjoy it on some level.
>>
>>88864487
Her song was about growing older and beginning to see their extremely capitalist Christmas for what it was.
>>
>>88870063
...where is this from, I need to know for scientific research.
>>
>>88867167
Brad Pitt as /co/
Helena Bonham Carter as /x/
Mackenzie Aladjem as [s4s]
Kira Buckland as /mlp/
Beyonce as /int/
BRENDAN FUCKING FRASER as /pol/

4chan: The Movie
>>
Can't wait to hear the song get butchered
...again.
>>
>>88860404
the live action fillm is fucking perfect
>>
>>88878693
>Pablo Francisco is the movie announcer.

>'IN A WORLD'
>>
>>88867118
>>88866963
the thing with Dr. Seuss books is that they're short and dont actually offer much material for a feature length film
>>
>>88876684
>>88876645
>>88876596
>>88876545
>>88876516
>>88876434
>>88876421
fucking lol
>>
>>88867138
>>88867167

it could be interesting to see a "social network" style movie of the making of 4chan and the behind the scenes of it all.

it probably wouldn't though
>>
>>88859460
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OK_RHFSly2E
i admire Seuss work a lot, and it's so sad to see it transformed into another product of the industry. Why is illumination of all people doing a Seuss cinematic universe? It's irony in it's purest form.

A Dr.Seuss movie should be independent, where it wouldn't be limited by toys or pop songs, and it could be 2d animated or stop motion. Where people could put passion without worrying about what sells, for the most part.
>>
File: TCyeods.jpg (95KB, 312x400px) Image search: [Google]
TCyeods.jpg
95KB, 312x400px
>>88874456
>>
File: 10.gif (2MB, 384x216px) Image search: [Google]
10.gif
2MB, 384x216px
>>88874456
>>
>>88873816
>When two men watch another man's head blown clean off by shrapnel, a life ended in the blink of an eye, you form a bond that is stronger than no other.

You do realize Dr. Seuss was a playwright for the Army, right?
>>
>>88861455
No. It's Cumberbatch.
>>
>>88879859
Whoville, I've come to bargain.
>>
>>88875279

This is quite 80s. I like it.
>>
>>88867983
Jones did Horton Hears a Who and The Cat in the Hat, too, and Fritz Freleng did half a dozen others.

The Lorax, Sneetches, and Hoober-Bloob Highway are all good.
>>
>>88868854
1989.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MNNl-oOI7I
>>
>>88874252
Media.
>>
>>88860404
That movie is a holiday classic and you know it!
Thread posts: 191
Thread images: 33


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.