>Person says a shows animation is bad >They are actually

File: 1476910548151.jpg (372KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

372KB, 1920x1080px

>>88764058
They are very, very, very dumb. Unlike you, you genius, you.

It's kind of autistic to separate the two when you're discussing with people who aren't actual animation snobs.

It's a masochistic hobby after all.

>>88764098
fair enough

>>88764058
Because if the art is bad seeing it in motion is horrible so its bad animation.

>>88764098
Knowing what you're talking about is being a snob now?

Do you know the difference between sound mixing and sound editing?
Would you care if other people tried to explain it to you?
That's how they feel

Doesn't matter america doesn't love animation anymore

>>88764497
If it were knowledge, there would be no dispute. There isn't even a worthy amount of discourse.

>>88764517
difference is, we don't talk about how bad sound mixing or sound editing is, we simply say the sound is bad, just like how okay it would be for someone to say "the art is bad" as "art" covers the entire spectrum.

>>88764058
How smoothly or convincing it moves doesn't matter if it's repulsing to look at.

>>88764058
Because those same people don't know the difference obviously.

Its like how normal people cant tell the difference between bad art and good art, but an artist actually can.
I wouldn't dare call my art good,despite what anybody, that isnt an artfag, says.

nobody on this board knows anything about animation including the op

>>88764751
I ate shit

It had salt, so it wasn't as bad as shit without salt