Which do you think are funnier? Old Golden Age Looney Tunes or modern day Mickey Mouse?
>Why not compare the old Mickey Mouse with new?
Because those are agreed by /co/ to be very boring. And so is Wabbit.
Bugs was a bigger asshole back then than Mickey ever dared so I prefer him from Mickey
Althought as whole I would Say they're pretty much on-par
>>88522527
Bugs >>>> Mickey any day of the week. He's just such a smug cunt and the way he goes about marinating his enemies in a thick layer of slowly built up butthurt is amazing.
Despite new Mickey cartoons being great it doesn't come close to the quality of old Looney Tunes.
>>88522527
Looney tunes and Disney Shorts were always miles apart in the first place why would you even compare them.
Looney tunes was way better when viewing them now but as a kid i liked them all.. not sure why theres this need to make everything into a competition.
>>88522527
Classic Mickey isn't boring. He's just not Bugs-level insane. Disney has always been a much more relaxed form of comedy, and probably slightly more geared towards the kids.
>>88522527
looney tunes was never funny
>>88525797
Well it's less to say Mickey is laid back and more he's more reactionary. Mickey is usually trying to do a thing and is met with comical hindrance
Buggs once provoked is a far more aggressive character
Woody woodpecker
>>88525570
This.
Daffy was the best part of any wb cartoon past or present
>>88527633
Of course you realise...This means WAR.