Honest question. If pic related were made into a TV show, would

It could, yeah. With the right people involved.

Do you pair it with Incorruptible, though?

i just started reading this a couple of days ago, on issue 13 right now.

is there a reading order jumping back and forth between irredeemable and incorruptible or are they 100% stand alone titles?

>>87899372
One crossover issue.

>>87899372
There's 1 arc they interact. I just read Irredeemable up to before that arc, then switched to Incorruptible so I had read both for the arc.

>>87899162
>Insectoid invasion!
>Space Jail!
>Gay robots!

Second half was trash.

>>87899442
what arc? do you know the issue number? or will i tell by reading?

As far as adaptations go, I think Preacher has a chance to be genuinely great.

>>87899449
It did loose a lot momentum. It was obvious he planned it to be much shorter, but extended while it was selling.

Incorruptible suffered similarly.

>>87899561
I feel like it made it clear on the covers, but I might be misremembering.

>>87899561
Incorruptible 21-23 should be it.

It was mostly limited to Incorruptible, if I recall correctly.

>>87899770
>>87899832
Thanks

File: 5 The Boys Homelander by Garth Ennis.jpg (38KB, 438x477px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 438x477px

>>87899738
The same thing happened to The Boys. It's inevitably what happens when you milk your creation for the cash alone, the Simpsons being only the most egregious example. Would still rather see a Boys TV series though.