This is something I've always been puzzled with. Why is

>Elderly people aren't allowed to befriend children

>>87744784
idk, i girl crush on an older boy happens all the time irl so i don't see anything wrong with it as long as it doesn't go past a simple crush

>>87744784
I think cartoons focus way too much on relationships.

Grown men can't be having relationships with young children of either gender, because the amount of child rape of both young boys and young girls is staggeringly one sided to men, and not women

>>87744821
That's not what I meant, I admire friendship across age gaps, but my criticism is of platonic and romantic relationship between two incompatible age groups.

Card Captor Sakura

>>87744887
Because of attitudes like this, basically.

The morality brigade thinks any relationship an older man has unless they're utterly desexualized involves wanting to fuck someone. They even made a movie about it, Ruby and Max. Good flick.

In related news they just caught another female teacher fucking two of her kid students near where I live.

>>87744784
Pretty sure I've seen it happen but can't come up with examples.

>>87745320
Adult cartoon or children cartoon?

>>87745262
Middle School?

File: 1444092200151.jpg (61KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 640x480px

>>87744915
The manga was way more explicit with the child-teacher relationship, but in both anime and book her mom was specifically mentioned to be 16 years old when she fell for a 30?40? teacher.

shameless bump

They need to start putting more sex in children's cartoons.

>>87744784
Dot in The Animaniacs was all over older guys.

Girls are protected from they are born until they are too old/ugly to give birth.
Boys are protected until they're roughly 5, then told to get their shit together.

A boy lusting for an older woman is seen as a lil' man knowing what he wants, but he likely won't get it (but sometimes he does).
A girl lusting for an older man is seen as a funny puppy-love crush that obviously won't last, and the man is required to turn her down.

An adult man lusting for a little girl is illegal and the man will probably get killed should he ever be punished for doing so, even if it's just thought-crimes.
An adult woman lusting for a little boy is totally fine and most judges will chuckle and let it pass because women are the ones in power in this society and can get away with literally anything, even murder, these days.

File: 1479379853359.jpg (275KB, 851x576px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 851x576px

>>87745262
>The morality brigade


People here see any character related to any other as them fucking, and create justifications and imply that there is actual subtext there.

File: 1478469834600.png (105KB, 500x412px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 500x412px

>>87744887

That's actually bullshit. As in, your statement has nothing to do with reality kind of bullshit.

The sole reason why platonic relationships between men and younger girls are "taboo" is because of feminism and the hysteria that comes with it. The goal is to isolate men from having contact with children, because children who have contacts with older men end up normal. The girls don't become sluts, lesbians, get piercings and piss their lives away. They become healthy young women that do not fear or despise men. And this is anathema to feminism, to lesbianism and all the assorted illnesses of modernity.

As a whole this is why society has engineered a climate of fear - it is to produce more worthless blank slates which are easily controllable and will obey. For a child to grow up properly he or she must have both male and female influence in their lives - in other words adult or older friends of both genders. As mentioned liberalism demands and is fueled exclusively by damaged individuals, thus the perpetual effort of (((powers))) to remove men from their progeny and other kids/teens.

Naturally, we will fix this. God wills it.