So, I keep seeing Marvel use this Rotten Tomatoes "Certified

File: John Wick.jpg (82KB, 630x753px)

82KB, 630x753px

It' a common practice, actually.

Case in point.

>>87541068
Because some people are still tricked into the "Rotten Tomatoes says its good so it must be good" meme

>>87541068
>I can't remember seeing something like this before.

I remember at a certain point The Paranormal Activity movies and other shitty horror movies used tweets in the commercials because they didn't have quotes to pull from reviews

They've been doing this with a bunch of movies lately. They're trying to catch-up to the internet era.

>>87542339

I've seen where the pull the word "good" or "riveting" out of context from reviews even if the review said something like "this movie is not good"

that's pretty common anon

>>87541068
I have a very distinct memory of First Class making a point of it being "Certified Fresh" in a couple ads.

>>87541068
Remember when WB used fake tweets to promote BvS?

Why do you think they did this?

>>87541068
>I can't remember seeing something like this before.
I think I can. Zootopia definitely had one TV spot that mentioned it. It kind of sounds like you're trying to push the narrative that there's some unusual association between RT and Marvel, when there's nothing there to go on besides that their movies are well reviewed.

>>87542493

as long as they put the "..." before the word good to show that its part of a longer quote, they're legally ok.

morally fucked though.

>>87542890
They were using real tweets from an alternate dimension where people who use twitter actually have good taste and can recognize kino for what it is.

File: really_anon__really.png (15KB, 198x247px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 198x247px

>>87541068
Stop being a NEET and go outside, OP.
If you go to any store that has DVDs, you'll see that it's now common for them to have a Rotten Tomatoes seal.