Is it just impossible for them to write an interesting female

>>87489757
>Is it just impossible for them to write an interesting female love interest?
because they have no character besides
>IS a love intrest

File: Kat Dennings.jpg (115KB, 467x700px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 467x700px

Thor's Darcy had two very interesting features though

>>87489757
She was barely in the movie. Maybe if she was in most of the movie, I would have bitched about her character being nothing. But since she is barely in the movie and not a key focus, this doesn't bother me at all.

>>87489757
>surgeon with nail polish
Just fucking kill me.

>>87490564
Good thing they covered her up in a thick turtle neck and jacket in an futile effort to make portman look better.

>>87489757

she is no love interest, they were only friends

God damn man, you're complaining about the wrong one here

>>87490564
She wasn't the love interest, which is probably why she was tolerable.

File: HayleyAtwellPeg2.jpg (993KB, 2295x2740px) Image search: [Google]

993KB, 2295x2740px

>Implying Peggy isn't a Top 5 character of the MCU, even if you ignore the show.

>>87489757
They didn't really write her as a love interest. What they did was in the past and they are friends now.

Rachel McAdams is a 10/10

File: tvOnTV.webm (1MB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 960x720px

>>87490964
ONE OF US

>>87490799
>she is no love interest, they were only friends
Hahaha. Yeah that's what she decided.

>>87489757
>Maybe they should stop trying altogether.

But then what will women enjoy other than the shitty love plot and the shirtless scenes?

>>87489757

This: >>87489965

>>87490980

Holy shit who made that?

>>87491071

best board

I felt so bad for Rachel McAdams, at least she's getting some Marvel money

>>87489757
who is "them?"

>>87490927
This. best love interest in all of cbm's