>supposed to be a "dangerous pedophile" >too

>>87473192
Wasn't that the joke?

>>87473192
So a capable pedophile that harms children would be a good character?

>>87473436
It would be if the children always managed to escape from him at the last second

>>87473589
Well he wouldn't be a dangerous pedophile then, now would he?

File: Behind-You-Penny-inspector-gadget-26749982-480-360.png (185KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 480x360px

>>87473589
This reminds me of something but I don't know what. Was there a cartoon like this?

>>87473589

I'm sure Seth would rather avoid the weekly FBI visits.

File: Source is Geiger Counter.png (298KB, 828x658px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 828x658px

>>87473192
>>87473436
Yeah, if we don't see the pedophile succeed every once in a while, where's the suspense?

Herbert is one of the few Family Guy characters I like.

>>87473697
Nothing like that.

More like a guy stalking a child then accidentally steps on a rake and trips and falls into a police car

File: 4955966-1383574997-47986.jpg (10KB, 300x225px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 300x225px

>>87473865
So you want the Wet Bandits?

>>87473192

Was he supposed to be portyed as dangerous?
He alsways more seemed to me like the comic kind. The kind that tries out ridiculous situations in order to make the boy take off his shirt and then goes OHHH YEAH and that's about it.
Of course I haven't watched FG in many years, was he portrayed in episodes as actually planning to kidnap/abduct/entrap boys who would enter his home?

>>87474090
this.
he always seeme like the garden variety pervert that likes to watch kids running around and then wank off to the memory of it in the comfort and privacy of his own home. like the ones Mark from Peep Show describes as the "good pedos", like his gym teacher.

He never seemed like the lecherous sociopath that actually tries to rape kids.

The REAL question should be why can't Seth McFarlane come up with a good cartoon!