>Gee Sam, according to the studio memo wrapped around this

haha women are so stupid right :P

>>87464331

More like the way women are written is so stupid. Writers are of all genders.

I love getting mad at things that didn't actually happen.

File: tumblr_nsrbloVQoo1r8h99uo1_500.png (139KB, 500x354px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 500x354px

How about we just have a Sam & Max and/or Rule 63 thread?

>>87464438
OK.

http://pastebin.com/s7acB0MD

I'm reading this in the TV show's voices.

It's amusing to think they'd retain the same voices.

>>87464299
>>87464438
It would be funnier if Max looked exactly the same as a girl.

>>87464299
>>87464438
>Max with tits
>Not just being regular Max with a bow
>No twist in the end were we learn Max's gender changes purely if he's wearing a bow or not
Dropped.

>>87464918

Truth

>>87464299
thicc

>>87464961
>implying the bow doesn't control whether Max has tits or not

>>87464918
That's what the TV studio wanted.

File: tmp_31636-female-symbol-2-clip-art-at-clker-com-vector-clip-art-online-xqLi0G-clipart-725647716.png (12KB, 348x592px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 348x592px

>>87464299
Don't forget to adorn yourself with this, so that people don't forget you're female.

File: 341324124132.png (160KB, 526x644px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 526x644px

>>87464918
>>87464974
On the one hand, yes.

On the other hand, hips.

>>87465379
Yes, hips.

File: samn&max_bigger.png (382KB, 1200x850px) Image search: [Google]

382KB, 1200x850px

>>87464438

Here, have a bigger version.

>>87465379
Praise be to hips!

inconspicuous bump

Post more rule63 sam&max

>>87465379
Hips, indeed

>>87464331
I agree.

>>87465379

Here here

Would you vote for Max?

>>87464299
>now that we're women, we have to replace half our gags with jokes about being female - and we're going to get some sort of mandatory fighting oppression and-or romance subplot during every case!
>Well, your habitual nudity is now a lot more objectionable to the censorship folks. Careful with that ribbon, buddy, it might be all that stands between us and shameful, body-selling destitution.
Congratulations, youve just described everything i fucking hate about genderbent iterations of characters and titles in one paragraph.

Part of me is confused by the existence of this, and the quantity of art for it. The other part of me remembers this is /co/, and that I shouldn't be shocked in the slightest.

>>87464299
Alright now wave at your crotch and say "muh vugiiiiinuh"

>>87469005
Sure, why not?

What are some female characters that don't deal with oppression and don't have
a romance plot/sub plot?

>>87464918
I always hate the "genderbend is sexier than normal version" garbage. If you're a dumpy guy you're gonna be a dumpy girl.

>>87472639
This assumes it's supposed to be directly equivalent. If these were supposed to be "genderflipped universe where Sam and Max were always girls" you'd be 100% correct, but considering this is an outside force transforming them then why can't said force pretty them up?

>>87469168
Women are funny get over it.

>>87464299

>Gee Sam, according to the studio memo wrapped around this brick, now that we're women, we have to replace half our gags with jokes about being female - and we're going to get some sort of mandatory fighting oppression and-or romance subplot during every case!
>Well of course, little buddy. If we didn't constantly draw attention to our femininity, people might come under the impression that being a girl is normal, or even inconsequential! We're never going to convince people that a person's gender is unimportant if we don't treat it like it's important.

Wait, is this a dig at old non-feminist writers doing female protagonists, or new feminist writers doing female protagonists?

>>87473663
Why not both?

>>87471756
the major from ghost in the shell

ITT: /pol/ thread disguised as a Sam and Max thread

File: 1346183937283.gif (134KB, 340x340px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 340x340px

>>87469168
>>87472765

>>87476142
This the best version. Makes me wanna take Sam and pet her ears.

>>87476184
If you say so. Sam and Max could easily be done genderswapped for an episode of a telltale game and they'd make jokes about their gender for sure.

However Steve Purcell is clever, witty, and funny when writing dialogue and /co/ is clearly not.

so should we post other Rule 63 stuff here or what?

also can we please keep any Avatar, Harry Potter, or DC/Marvel related R63 discussion/image dumping to a minimum, cause those concepts have been dominating most of our recent threads on this topic, making it hard to talk about anything else