Imagine Ginger in this scene...oh wait, you can't. Why

>Actually having an abbreviation

You are some kind of creepo.

>>87383249
>he hasn't heard of ENF (Embarrassed Nude Female)

Newfag much?

>>87383322
he kind of has a point. acronyms never improve anything, or N.I.A.

You need to watch some French animation.

>>87383590
This. And French comics.

>>87383204
Why is /co/ so obsessed with underage nudity?

>>87383703
gosh, why would people be obsessed with something neutral-to-good, with the potential to be abused, but draconically and inexplicably forbidden from not only depiction but even talking about?

>>87383846
Speak ye any English?

>>87383664
oh please, do tell more about the comics

>>87383869
i pared that down as hard as I could, anon.
suffice it to say, the way the subject is treated, it's inevitable it would attract obsession. If people treated MATH the way they treat underage nudity, we'd all be einstein.

>>87383878
Le Pyrenne

>>87383869
> I'm a pedophile

I just translated for you

Pedophile pretension?

New one on me.

>>87383846
>>87383921
Shit, I jerk off to loli and shota and you sound more like a pedophile than me.

>>87383963
you mean Pyrénée? or are there two similarly-titled french comics full of cute nakeds

>>87384019
start having-a-problem-with-fucked-up-attitudes-and-censorship, please. it's the reason there are actual molesters.
and for god's sake stop acting like things are somehow worse if kids are involved, as if an equivalent crime against an adult hasnt already maxed out the offense levels.

>>87384064
>you mean Pyrénée?
Yes.

>>87384120
>censorship is the reason for child molesters
My fucking sides. That is some quality level shift blaming.

>>87384179
it's also scientifically proven. and that's coming from someone who rolls eyes anytime anything is claimed to be scientifically proven

>>87384266
>scientifically proven
This is how you know they're just speaking bullshit.

>>87384266
Yes, I remember when schools banned Catcher in the Rye and teenagers everywhere were caught having sex with their copies of the book.

>>87384315
would you or anyone have read it if it hadn't been banned? would you even know the name?
it wasn't banned from fucking it, it was banned from reading. jesus christ, try to keep up

>>87383204
naked dudes = hilarious
naked girls = sexy paedo bait

>>87384378
>Murkans can't separate nudity from sex
Colour me shocked.

>>87384120
Sexual crimes are worse against children because children's brains are less developed and thus they have less ability to cope.

>>87384367
>would you or anyone have read it if it hadn't been banned?
I didn't give a shit about it even when I knew it was a banned book. Just like how I don't give a shit about child nudity because it's censored.

>it wasn't banned from fucking it
No shit, sherlock. Just like how not seeing children nude doesn't suddenly make you want to fuck one. Get the point?

>>87384430
last i checked, the many, many things that happen to children as a vital part of growing up hurt them a lot less because they don't understand them. for example literally everything that happens for the first few years.
coping with shit makes it a lot worse, especially when you have people screaming in your ear nonstop about how you were damaged and you should feel worse about it. like theyre doing with rape victims and soldiers now

>>87384446
not being allowed to see them makes you want to see them, when you otherwise shouldn't care.
being treated like you're automatically a molester for being an adult male, for showing any kind of friendliness towards women or children, THAT makes you want to molest.
treating people like criminals for being black makes them criminals. are you not seeing that pattern?

>>87384469
>let's molest children! they don't understand it so it must be a vital part of growing up!

File: 2434324324243.gif (1MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 500x281px

>>87384469
>coping with shit makes it a lot worse
How can there be a living human being with no brain.

The fact that you have an acronym for it is a pretty telling reason anon

>>87384508
>not being allowed to see them makes you want to see them, when you otherwise shouldn't care.
Not with me. Sounds like a you problem.

>being treated like you're automatically a molester for being an adult male, for showing any kind of friendliness towards women or children,
>THAT makes you want to molest.

No it doesn't. Being treated like a molester doesn't make you want to be a molester. What kind of retarded logic is that?

>>87384508
>being treated like you're automatically a molester for being an adult male, for showing any kind of friendliness towards women or children,
>THAT makes you want to molest.
Is it time to contact the fbi yet?

>>87384526
He has a brain. He's just using all of it to justify wanting to see children's penises and vaginas.

Is there something you'd like to confess OP?

>this thread
My brain is full of billions and billions of fuck.

>>87383204
>Why are cartoons so afraid of UFN? (underage female nudity)

Why are you so fixated on it?

Dig the dancing queen
She was just seventeen
Having the time of her life

File: 1354738681973.gif (996KB, 150x148px) Image search: [Google]

996KB, 150x148px

ITT: We spot the pedophile.

It's OP, there, I just saved you the effort

>40 posts
>only 14 posters

>>87385558
It's almost as if people make more than one post. As if they're having a conversation with each other.

>>87385586
Or there's a lot of samefagging going on, specifically:

>>87383249
>>87383703
>>87383967
>>87383991
>>87384378
>>87384430
>>87384510
>>87384633
>>87384852
>>87385303
>>87385522

>>87383322
Oh, fuck you, don't associate us with you UFN people

>>87385672
>everyone that disagrees with me is samefag
Ok buddy.

>>87385672
>Making multiple posts makes you a samefag
First day on 4chan?

>>87383703
It's just kind of fucked that you can show males but god forbid a female is shown.

So much for that equality.

>>87385861
Nah, just Murriburger cartoons.

>>87385672
11 different people know now, what a fucking dickwad you are.

>>87383204
Not only with underage.

Take Bob's Burgers for example. They hand no problem showing Bob's asscrack whenever nudity was a prominent theme.
But Linda who was always nude along with Bob so far, got her parts censored. Not just her vajay, also her teetees and asscrack.

And this goes far beyond that. Basically both Belcher boys are confirmed bi. It's not the same for Belcher girls though (though given how every female looks disgusting on the outside and is a varying degree of bitch on the inside, this is actually not surprising, to be honest)

man i just clicked cuz i saw the as told by ginger pic and i immediately clicked thinking it was a thread about as told by ginger but its a pedo board :^(