Now that the dust has settled, can't we all agree that this

>>87127570

Is this a parody cover or a callback cover? I'm certain I've seen it before without Batman

>>87127570
It's a terrible run, but the movie was surprisingly great. It might be one of the few instances where the movie adaptation was better than the comic.

>>87127617
It's a parody of good comics, if that's what you meant.

File: 1386648279532.png (279KB, 371x349px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 371x349px

>>87127570
No because Judd Winick is the result of locking an infinite amount of Scott Lobdells in a room with an infinite amount type writers. He really only managed to get lucky with the movie. Hell, every subsequent time he's wrote Jason it manged to be worse than the previous time.

>>87127570
Post some of the interior art. I love Mahnke, but sometimes he is utterly sabotaged by mediocre coloring.

>>87128022

>the movie was surprisingly great

How are people able to believe this? It was the cringiest, least well written Batman movie of all time.

>I'm gonna need some guys... not these guys because well they're kind of dead HAHAHAHAHA

MOMS GONNA FREAK

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HziQVWw0Kg

>>87128947

In contrast, this is what a quality Batman movie with patrician Mark Hamill Joker looks like:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVy9DFwT-4o

>>87128947
That's not Killing Joke

>>87128947
>Believe
>HURR MY OPINION IS FACT

I liked it, fight me irl.

>>87129173

Killing Joke was surprisingly bad, but still not Under the Red Hood bad.