>Marvel is for girls DC is for boys
>Marvel is for kids DC is for adults
How true are these statements?
Very
>>86719909
Nah, chicks love DC desu. Check your local social media.
>>86719909
Pretty true on the kids vs adults. Not true at all for the kids vs boys.
>>86719909
>Batman beating Spider-Man
DROPPED
>>86719909
100% true.
>>86719909
Girls love DC
probably something to do with how Marvel has no female heroes that they actually want to promote (because they gave away the movie rights to all the good ones)
>>86719909
>comics for girls
Doesn't happen
>comics for adults
Pathetic
>>86719909
Superhero Girls prove you wrong though
A
>cape comics
>for adults
>>86720063
No Marvel hero could ever defeat a DC one.
>>86719909
DC has Harley Quinn
Bitches love Harley Quinn
>>86719909
100% true
>>86720309
>kids
>reading comics
>it's a company wars thread
I, for one, am glad that Hiro is going to shut down 4chan.
Both are for kids
>>86719909
>>86720309
Have you ever seen a kid in current year buy and read a comic that isn't manga in the library?
Comics are for grown up nostalgiafags.
>>86720440
Then why the fuck are you here in the first place?
>>86719909
The truest.
>>86720340
>>86720548
Cyclops sucks though
>>86720524
Girls like gore for no reason, makes them feel "alternative"
>>86720488
the targeted market for capes were for kids. But yeah, I meant adult in the sense of the medium as a genre. Like compare Captain Underpants to 1984.
>>86719909
>batman beating spidey
>wolverine beating supes
>cap taking on diana
TRIGGERED
>>86720340
Spider-Man could rip most DC heroes in half. Literally.
Marvel isn't for kids really because they're more "edgy" I guess is the word
DC exists in a weird niche (speaking of rebirth) where it'sfunand light hearted enough for kids, but also hitting the nostalgic buttons for adults too
>>86724913
I think you got that backwards
>>86719909
Marvel is for whoever controls the market at that time.
>>86719909
everything is for everyone, nothing matters and there is no pleasure nor pain in life but that which we make ourselves
>>86720548
Sauce
>>86720340
Bait
>>86719909
Very true
Like Harry Potter was for kids and girls
While lord of the rings was for boys and adults
>>86720309
comics are so boring. i don't know of any kid that reads them. only adults who can handle reading through terrible writing to reminisce over their favorite superhero
>>86725899
Reeee i am over 30 and love comics fuck your mouth also checked nice digits
Praise kek
>>86723245
Lolno he most definitely could not.
>>86719909
>Batman beating Spider-man
>Wolverine beating Superman
>Cyclops beating Aquaman
These are all bullshit.
>>86726747
Seems believable to me
Of course I believe the opposite can happen as well it being comics and all
But I can definitely see these outcomes
>>86724913
>>86725561
They both have edgy shit writers and decent fun-loving writers, it's not limited to just DC or Marvel.
>>86726747
I think aquaman v cyclops could be a fairly close fight auctualy.
>>86726701
He is one of the strongest beings on the planet.
He could tear apart a gorilla with his bare hands.
>>86726770
Batman has no way of really taking down Peter without preptime (which is already giving him an unfair advantage), and even preptime would require Spidey being an idiot because lol Spider sense.
Wolverine should never, ever, be able to defeat any Superman outside of maybe the original 1930's one. Super can literally just punt him into orbit.
Aquaman is simply too tanky for Cyclops to take down. Even a full power blast shouldn't be enough to down him. He's near Superman's level, after all.
>>86726798
I love Spiderman but you're kind of overrating him. He could definitely take Batman, yeah, but shit like Flash or Wonder Woman would shit all over him.
>>86719909
Marvel is for casuals who read a comic because a film was based on it
DC is the same except people actually try and look for the ones of quality regardless if they are known or not
Any other publisher is for people who don't want to deal with capeshit and actually want to read comics at their peak