If "Suicide Squad" is succesful, will David Ayer take over the DCEU from Zack Snyder like the Russos took over from Joss Whedon?
>>84977196
Really depends how JL plays out.
>>84977196
if JL fails, maybe.
>>84977301
It'll never fail, but I doubt it'll win over the critics.
>>84977196
No, but he would sure will get a sequel and probably another anti-hero or villian related movie
WB is probably going to try to get either Affleck or even try to rope Nolan back to take over for Snyder.
>>84977391
Then no.
>>84977196
Lemme call up my uncle who works for WB and ask
Which tattoos would he give to the Justice League members?
>>84977700
not before I ask my dad who works at WB first.
I hope not because I don't like Snyder nor BvS, but the Squad footage I've seen so far is horrible.
>>84977196
I'd prefer it if Patty Jenkins did. She seems to understand the heroism part of these characters that Snyder is lacking in. Ayer seems like a cool dude, just give him villain movies to direct. Secret Six would be pretty neat.
It's just so goddamn bullshit that arguably the best person for the job -- Chris Nolan -- pretty much can't do it because he still wants to direct his own stuff.
>inb4 Nolan isn't the best
More than anything, Nolan sort of instinctively understood the balance between making a "movie about a superhero" and just making a movie that happened to feature a superhero.
The choices that people have listed so far skew too heavily towards one or the other -- Snyder, of course, leans too heavily on "movie that just so happens to feature superheros", whereas Ayer and Jenkins (from what we've seen, which isn't much to go on) seem to go more towards making films directly about superheroes.
Nolan's balance was perfect. He wasn't always amazing (TDKR for instance), but even with his misfires, he was still controversial in a positive manner, in all the ways that Snyder wishes MoS/BvS were controversial.
>>84978633
He torched the Nolanverse and ran, why would he go back to DC films?
>>84977196