Why didn't he just take out his phone and record the

Because the frog wouldn't have moved like when people were around
stupid bait post
try harder next time

>>84905394

Because they didn't have smartphones in 1955.

someone probably tried it in the current Looney Tunes ongoing already and I guarantee >>84905436 should be the result

>>84905790
Newfag

o, shit, waddup!

>He records the frog dancing.
>Tries to show others.
>The video is just 30 seconds of a frog sitting there.

>>84905394
I know you're joking but kids today would probably actually ask that question. That makes me sad.

>>84905394
If he would just have sex with it when no one's around it would start singing and dancing just to get away from him.

File: vlcsnap-2016-04-20-09h01m01s231.jpg (12KB, 300x220px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 300x220px

>>84908214
Why?
Years ago, people would ask "why not film it", years more, "why not take a photo".
Years to come, people will ask different questions, all still answerable by "the frog will still screw him over in the end".

>>84908177
That's more of a total mindfuck than a punchline.

Because thats a normal frog, moron. Frogs can't dance.

Dancing frogs...you're crazy, man.

>>84908177
I like the way you think.

The frog can outrun the flash. What chance does a phone have?

>>84913718
Ah, that would explain >>84908177

If the frog is fast enough, it could return to its sitting position each frame of the recording.