Do you ever have the concern that /co/ content creators actually

>>84846633
Concern? No. I hope for it.

>>84846633
>le 4chan is the most depraved place
You never learn, do you?

>>84846633
Do any non-fa/tg/uys even get this image? I didn't think the meme had spread.

>>84847589
If there are two things /co/ knows, it's webcomics and disgusting fetishes.

Trust me, everyone on this damn board knows about the pee wizard.

>>84847589

Its a KC green strip, it was without a doubt seen here before than in /tg/

And i dont have any concern about it, i KNOW a ton of "industry people" including creators do market research or steal ideas from here. It's never even been a secret.

>>84846633
They do. All the time.

Also depraved? This shit is tame compared to what used to go on.

/co/ seems to have a lot of confirmed cases of creators coming here

>>84850363
Well if they're here now someone tell one of them from Marvel to go read the recommendations made on the Galacta thread.
That poor character needs a comeback and we worked it all out, damnit!

>>84850395
Any screenshots?

I feel like Sucrose is behind the gay threads

>>84850501
"Phrasing."

>>84850453
I remember some soda cans in a Sonic comic having /co/ on the side.

>>84850501
Sucrose likes men?

>>84850453
It's not our job to screencap every single creator that bothers to put on a trip, but to answer your question, Ian Flynn and Steve Lieber for a start.

It must feel awful to look up to /co/ to discuss your stuff of all places

>Oh boy I wonder if /co/ likes the elements introduced in the last update
>"I wanna fuck that" waifu image dump while calling the artist a faggot for no reason