Hey, /co/. I'm trying to get caught up on the exploits of

it sure as hell is not

Uncanny Avengers wasnt good

get Axis and the current Uncanny X-Men by Cullen Bunn

>>81677981
Thanks for the blunt assessment.

>>81678033
I can get it cheap, so I thought, why not. Its his debut on a hero team.

I'm trying to get the back issues of the latest Uncanny X-men too.

Thanks, guys.

>>81678033
>Uncanny Avengers wasnt good
The new volume? Yes I agree. But both volumes by Remender are great.

>>81677913
Man I wanted all of those titles to be good.

>>81678769
Eh, the first volume, right after AvX isn't that great. Maybe I'm just burned out on "high concept" stories, though. Remender is big on throwing every idea and the kitchen sink into a story and they become a muddled mess of themes of motifs with unconvincing characterization.

>>81677913
wolverines is about people pretending to be wolverine after he dies

File: wolverines.png (464KB, 506x714px) Image search: [Google]

464KB, 506x714px

>>81681483

>>81678769
that story about Wanda, Pietro and the high evolutionary sucked, and it is the only one with good sabretooth, so I guess op means that one.

He plays a minor role in Rage of Ultron.
Nothing big, and it doesn't add anything to him as a character, but still something to consider if you want more of him.

>>81677913

Uncanny Avengers V2 isnt worth buying, i got the floppies as it came out and its just a bunch of retconny bullcrap about wanda and pietro with high evolutionary providing the ample stereotypical exposition dumps