It's kinda bad
because bright colors are for fags. only mature viewers like dark, muted colors. are you new to DCU?
Man, if Affleck could muscle up for his role, why do they never get a female actress to build some muscle?
Is that so much to ask? A little muscle tone? Or is WW's part doomed to be played by a walking toothpick no matter what?
HEY GAIS WHAT'S GOING ON IN THIS THREAD?!
What dissapoints me most about this costume is there was some (leaked?) concept art with a small figure of Wonder Woman and the costume looked pretty ok in that drawing with the dress looking unique and nice but to call this cosplay tier would be an insult to cosplay. I am fucking baffled, I legitimately dont even thing Smallville would be this bad had Wonder Woman been on there. Holy shit.
Megan Gale herself looks fine on the right and dead on the left.
Pumped Batman, skinny stripper Wondy and Cavilman as the DC trinity.
This is going to be sooo good
Are you sure he did it for the role? Maybe his marriage broke down because he's just having a mid-life crisis. Lots of assholes hit the gym at his age.
I honestly never noticed the tiara before, but it does imply that she's not going to be expected to emote in-costume, doesn't it?
This is technically also concept art, since they never made the thing. The problem you're having is assuming they wouldn't do hundreds of turnarounds, some of them quite minor variations, to find the ones they like. They could probably release one a week for a year and not run out, and it wouldn't necessarily be the case that any of them were more favored than the others.
>They have the same figure here
No they don't. Gal actually put on muscle. And looks good in the costume. Gale still looks like a model in a cheap costume.
For the scenes that matter at the very least.
Cavill was basically starving/dry/pumped up for his shirtless scene and it was the last filmed scene of the movie to maximise his size. But for the rest of the movie he's smaller but you don't notice due to costumes and less empasis.
So yeah if they want a scene that really accentuates her muscles they will probably have her on a pump for that particular filming sequence.
What is the obsession with casting twigs as wonder woman? I know there is the whole hollywood is afraid of strong women leads thing, but the chicks they pick are fucking stick figures and unattractive.
>What is the obsession with casting twigs as wonder woman?
Marvel has cast every brunette they can find who could potentially be Wonder Woman.
Marvel in fact cast Elodie Yung as Elektra after she lost the Wonder Woman role, and Gina Carano is in Deadpool as a mutant brawler.
I assume Olga Kurylenko will get cast by Marvel any day now.
Sure thing, buddy
>bumb boob armor
Fuck you, that is the way it is in the comics, do you want her to look like a fucking man you prude shit stain.
>ugly thigh high hooker boots
Fuck you they are fucking bad ass other than the heels.
>belts that do nothing
Fuck you, She has a sword holster on her back
ITT: a version that never happened wasn't good, this means Gogogot version great
They probably told her to lose weight
Dear God, what the fuck is with this woman's face?
Did Erica Henderson design this woman?
Was her father a shovel?
Did she get 3rd degree burns on her head so they had to graft a foot on her fucking face?
Was there some tragic accident involving a tabletop vice grip that I'm not aware of?
How the fuck do you get famous looking like that?
>How the fuck do you get famous looking like that?
Batman looks like he has no idea what to do with his hands.
>"Should I put them on my hips? No I'll look like I'm being sassy or something... I could cross my arms... Mmm nah then I'll cover up my logo... Maybe I can just put my hands in my pockets. My Bat-Pockets... No that'll look worse, people will probably think I'm touching my Bat-Dick or something..."
>if you're talented you can be ugly as Hell and still get famous
Then again that would explain Maggie Gyllenhaal and that one girl from Game of Thrones who looks like a 14 year old girl with Downs. However you did say "talent" so I guess Gyllenhaal just got lucky.
Not that anon but Gal has bigger tri's. She also fills in her uniform better around the chest. Hard to tell with the thighs because gal has less of hers covered.
If you can't see that you really need to get the semen out of your eyes.
>Gal has more of the muscle that is not possible to see in the picture
>they have the same figure
Nigga wat? Gal may not be full on "female MMA fighter", but she's no longer a hungry skeleton, unlike OP's bitch
>bright colors are for fags
>being this far in denial
>belts that do nothing
You guys aren't even trying anymore
It's not going to make that big of a difference. The actual losses in muscle volume minute to minute are down to circulation of blood - so to maintain larger volume your muscles have to be in a constant state of work, or near work. Your circulatory system reassigns blood to other areas when your muscles don't need it (this is good, or you wouldn't be able to digest food, for example, or get sexually aroused regardless of gender).
The problem for an actor on-set is that if the scene isn't particularly long - and the scene might be, but if it's broken down into a hundred shots across just a few cameras, that's where the problem lies - then they don't get the chance to stay warm, so their circulation isn't maximised through the musculature.
In any case it's a negligible difference unless you're so enormous you already gave yourself heart disease.
Are you telling me that getting pumped up after a work-out doesn't make a significant difference to your appearance? That's straight-up bullshit. I don't want to be the douchebag to imply that you need to lift... but come on, if you've ever lifted you'd know full well that's there's a huge difference pre and post workout.
>proceeds to post picture where she looks the same
Fucking faggadots, I swear
Both Gale and Gadot look too thin to play the daughter of Zeus and the queen of a tribe of warrior women that bred by raping sailors. Neither of them have the shoulders or thighs for it, and I've seen smaller women with more arm muscle.
They look the same. Only difference is one has a better photoshop job.
Still calling bullshit on that. There has to be more than 5 fucking women who can act, project a muscular/fighter build, and be a team player.
These people they're picking are missing all 3 marks AND the furious fap bait quota.
>this entire thread
I swear we need a flag or something next to the Anonymous that will show if someone posts in /pol/ as well as here.
You guys are better off waiting for the movie to come out before talking about Wonder Woman unless you want every single thread to turn in to jew bashing and body shaming.
>literally bumping a dead thread just so you can shitpost some more
Not in the New 52. I accurately stated the current origin story. The Amazons would rape soldiers to have children and give the boy babies to Hephaestus, although Diana was the product of Zeus's infidelity.
>Are you sure he did it for the role
Yes. He did a great job.
Not everyone in this thread that is critiquing Gadot/Gale for not having enough muscle mass is body shaming but vocalizing a real concern. Most fans would like to see a Wonder Woman that actually looks buff like in the comics. However, Hollywood perpetuates sexism and will not hold actresses to the same standard as actors; men are forced to look just like the source material but women frequently look much leaner.
The top part of the costume is not so bad in big resolution
Oh hey. It's just Wonder Woman with aids.
The amount of muscles in this pic and most I have been able to find is around the same amount we have seen Gal built up in recent photos.
Don't be thick. Even the source material doesn't have as much muscles as /co/ seems to be screaming for and the fact that we have had numerous threads about how the wonder woman porn did a better job than DC did just goes to prove the only issue people seem to have about the casting is that she isn't the perfect masturbatory fantasy.
Inb4 bait.jpg. I don't remember hearing a single objection when Scarlet's soft body was cast as SHIELDs most capable assassin.
Black widow is a normal woman who's supposed to look like a hot super spy/assassin fantasy.
WW is supposed to be some swole dyke super warrior from warrior lesbian manhate island.
Her origin of being jackoff material for a kek/submissive and his dominatrix wife is no longer on the table.
All that matters is her being swole super warrior bitch. Basically a more gay version of xena played 100% straight
>they do it for free
That cover strikes me as odd because as well drawn as it is, she looks way smaller than average depictions of Wonder Woman.
Look at those shoulders. It is was an Amazon warrior should look like.
I can't help but wonder if they based that cover art on the recent casting.
Look at her compared to Superman. Clearly you are the one who is thick, or rather I should say it is Wonder Woman who is thick in the other sense of the word. Not that Hollywood would ever give us a realistic Rhonda Rousey-looking Diana.
Even though I do not like this poster's tone, anon is on point about Black Widow being normal looking (albeit she should be muscular in her own right as an assassin). Scarlet can pull of the source material.
>put on muscle
Can't you picked someone else, Zack?
Hey, she might be thin and all that, and I agree that nothing in her appearance screams "Wonder Woman". Or even quietly whispers it. But if you think she's ugly, you're downright delusional.
Hey, I think Emma Stone is ugly as sin. But I also have a brain that can analyze lots of data and conclude that in that particular instance - I'm wrong. If you personally don't find someone attractive, but see that pretty much everyone else on the planet does - then you calling he person ugly just makes you look like a dumbass.
Argumentum ad populum is a thing you know. Outliers are a thing as well.
There are very few things that are believed without doubt by every single person on Earth, and just because a large number of people believe something doesn't necessarily mean it's objectively true. Doesn't mean it's wrong either. Just subjective.
I can post just as many versions that aren't buff gentlemen, and I would be just as correct as you are. There is no "right" way to draw such a long standing character. It's a question of what looks good, and what doesn't.
So you would look like a dumbass by your own example?
>I'm wrong. If you personally don't find someone attractive, but see that pretty much everyone else on the planet does
One helluva stretch considering you're only sampling social media and magazine covers.
What looks good is having women share in the same sense of realism as men in movies since that is what film is going for these days. Buff does not mean unattractive, as long as neither sex is completely roided out because that looks gross on everyone. But something like this right here is not too much to ask. Stand someone like Rousey next to Gadot and the latter looks just like a hot cosplayer with a nice costume and not a believable portrayal of the character herself.
Look, Snyder is from the same waif-fu school as Joss Whedon where his action girls all weigh 90 pounds and high school gymnastics is the world's deadliest martial art. The only difference between the two of them is that Whedon will throw in a bunch of foot focus shots because that's his fetish.
We knew going into this that Wonder Woman was going to be cast by the director of Sucker Punch. If you couldn't see Gadot or someone like her as a result of that, then that was on you.
First, he's a Scabbard. Second, Being on the back is lame because on the hip not only breaks up the costume more, it's also practical and avoids needing to do cut aways every fucking time she draws it.
>Source: Prop Designer.
>Sword is sharp all the way down
>Instead of a scabbard it's held by tiny bits of Leather.
They could have literally paid me 50 bucks and I would have made a better sword and a better setup.