Remember, it's not wrong if it's official. Gather

I show my wad in the Wakfu thread so I have a bit of a mess on my hands.

File: almost.gif (2MB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 200x200px

>>71891860

>>71891860
This makes me uncomfortable uncomfortably erect

File: REEEEEEE.png (487KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

487KB, 900x900px

>>71891860

GET AWAY FROM MY DAUGHTERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

>>71892427
Muh dick!!

>>71892492
would people actually jack off to a girl in full chain mail armour eating a cookie?

File: f1f62459c6d8d2667cd4d623d447f14c.png (100KB, 198x233px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 198x233px

>>71892532
/k/ jacks off to guns, you clearly dont understand where you are.

>>71892532
Why are you asking? I certainly would.

>>71892427
Fappers aside, what it is from?

File: ohgodwhydididothis.gif (1MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 500x281px

>>71892597
a cookie commercial in some country i cant remember. France i think?

File: sample_48b84af25d8092cd47b246cba2ce8528.jpg (91KB, 850x786px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 850x786px

IS this what lewd threads have to be now?

Fuck it

>sample

>>71892655
just looked it up,it from a set of commercials for prince de lu cookies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOKjgCn99bM

her...his? name is joe.

>>71892659
Normally I'd call you gwen fags pedos but I'm absolutely okay with this.

>>71892631
>sees perfect CGI girls in commercial
>not sure if France
Of course it's France.
>>71892874
She's secretly in love with the much older Prince Rick.
A lot of rule34 needs to be done here.

>>71893273
i mostly just find it hilarious a cookie company can make higher quality animated shorts then some movies ive seen.

>>71893471
That's because A) that company is huge and B) these shorts are, well, short.
But I wouldn't mind them making an entire porn movie with these characters.

>>71892659

This is supposed to be a CANON lewd thread, dipshit.

>>71892659
she's underage in that pic too, you fucking pedo.

>>71896735
meant for this son of a bitch>>71893261

>>71894895
What about if lewdness is the rule, rather than the exception? 'Cause there's a bunch of .co. created stuff that's rather lewd.

File: ass-aulted.jpg (109KB, 630x441px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 630x441px

Does this count?

File: shanti1.webm (864KB, 1264x720px)

864KB, 1264x720px

Classic official lewd.

>>71897576
Didn't Walt Disney say something like "That is a well-drawn, sexy child, Steve." to the animator?

File: anime girl pepe.jpg (29KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 499x499px

>>71897628
I think that was a /co/ rumor

but even if true, was he wrong?

File: shanti2.webm (618KB, 1264x720px)

618KB, 1264x720px

>>71897628
"That's a pretty sexy little girl, Ollie" is what he said.
And he was talking about this close-up right here where she wrinkles her nose.