So how do they get the chocolate on these things anyhow without

>>9295710
wizards n shiet

>>9295710
As they are quite light they use an air current which allows them to float and also dries the chocolate at the same time.

>>9295710
How do Whoppers compare to Maltesers?

Watch this, retard

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nD7ZCEMPIXw

they make the little crunchy balls first, then they lightly cover them in chocolate while they tumble down a ramp in a chiller, then they roll in a drum with a little bit of wax on it

they are literally wax coated, but most people dont notice. anything like that, where its super smooth chocolate all the way around, is wax coated. many of your favourite candies actually have wax and you've never noticed!

File: sweets.png (379KB, 644x482px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 644x482px

>>9295826
Thanks, cocksmoker

Still blows my mind we spend so much time and energy making things which are essentially useless. And then you can still make a profit selling them to kids with pocket money...

File: 1502488895617.jpg (23KB, 402x431px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 402x431px

>>9295877
Really makes you think, huh kid?

>>9295877
Nigga, what the fuck are you talking about
"essentially useless"? Just because it's candy doesn't mean that it can't be a work of art and science. And I'm pretty sure that plenty of adults like candy too.

>>9295910
Mass produced gumballs are not a work of art of science

>>9295912
Imagine how genuinely unintelligent you have to be to make a post like this

>>9295918
You sound like the type of guy to defend pickle rick

>>9295912
Well I'm not the imagine ___ guy, I'm the guy to whom you're responding. I would at the very least consider them a work of science. I'm just saying, your remark about them being "useless" is weird in the first place. What is useful food? Are you really about to go down that path?