https://skillet.lifehacker.com/will -it-sous-vide-the-head-o

>>9285627
Pig ears are fairly good, never tried snout or the rest but giving it a sous vide seems kinda dumb. Roast that shit like a real man.

File: Screenshot_20170502-102951.jpg (588KB, 1094x1024px) Image search: [Google]

588KB, 1094x1024px

anyone feel like all the stuff you sous vide has no soul? i did 36 hours short ribs and they were extremely tender and sound amazing on paper but they didn't impress me much. Maybe because the texture is too uniform?

I still like steaks sous vide, probably because I sear them after which gives them some character.

>>9285642
It's pretty widely known that smoked pork is far better than sous vide.

>>9285674
they were beef, that was just one example though

>>9285642
why would you sous vide short ribs?

You can't argue with the results, but holy fuck who would bother spending all that time cooking something?

>>9285799
curiosity? it's a popular sous vide recipe

>>9285847
seems pointless. just braise or boil it. it's a fatty and strong tasting cut and the bones have a lot of flavor (boneless is an abomination), so sous vide just seems like a waste. I know it's popular but everything is with sous vide. I really can't think of any particular reason to sous vide short ribs when traditional methods already produce good results. Even he said it wasn't impressive

>>9286132
yeah that's me

many traditional methods of cooking anything already produce good results in comparison to sous vide. end result was different, someone may prefer it over braised. you never try a different method for anything at least once?

>>9285642
How did u finish? It's all in the finish.

>>9286169
Every cook experiments, but I'm not going to sous vide an entire pig head like OP.

>>9286169
yeah, I never meant to say don't try it, but I just was wondering if there is any real reason to bother, other than curiosity.